per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and
internationalization is too long, why not go with "nls"?
I personally think that nls is equally as cryptic as i18n or l10n.
Anyone care for "intlzn"? It's short, should still tab-complete
from "in", and it may be a bit less cryptic than nls, i18n, or l10n.
If I may be so bold as to present a democratic outcome.
To help settle the matter please vote on this issue within 48 hours.
<http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/615850-178803>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
