vpnc connects, but does not work

I have installed vpnc to connect to an employer's Cisco VPN system, and it seems to make the connection, but after connecting I can't ping the gateway nor anything beyond it. The symptom seems to resemble what is described in the Routing section of http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~flemej/fbsd-cisco-vpn.pdf,

TeXLive

Hi! There have been numerous mails about adding ports for TeXLive to FreeBSD [1,2,3,4], unfortunately, nothing is available so far. Since I really think TeXLive can be a plus for FreeBSD, and because I use TeXLive on another system, I started another effort to bring it to the ports tree. In ord

Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/xmill Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/archivers/xmill/files patch-XMill+BZlib.cpp patch-makefile patch-src::Main.cpp patch-src::ZLib.cpp

Hi, The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on 7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly" and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the following vars set: NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_

Re: TeXLive

On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 02:10:12PM +0100, Romain Tartière wrote: > Hi! > > There have been numerous mails about adding ports for TeXLive to FreeBSD > [1,2,3,4], unfortunately, nothing is available so far. > > > Since I really think TeXLive can be a plus for FreeBSD, and because I > use TeXLive o

Re: TeXLive

On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 03:21:01PM +0100, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 02:10:12PM +0100, Romain Tartière wrote: > > 3. One port per Package, grouping related packages (e.g. foo, > > foo.source and foo.doc) (/[0-9]{4}/ ports) + meta-port for > > Collections (84 meta-ports

Re: TeXLive

Romain Tartière wrote in <20081224131012.ga8...@blogreen.org>: ro> Hi! ro> ro> There have been numerous mails about adding ports for TeXLive to FreeBSD ro> [1,2,3,4], unfortunately, nothing is available so far. ro> ro> ro> Since I really think TeXLive can be a plus for FreeBSD, and because I

Re: TeXLive

On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:32:46AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Romain Tartière wrote > in <20081224131012.ga8...@blogreen.org>: > > ro> There have been numerous mails about adding ports for TeXLive to FreeBSD > ro> [1,2,3,4], unfortunately, nothing is available so far. > > I am the one who we

Re: proposal: add --disable-tests to www/firefox3 port

* Eitan Adler (eitanadlerl...@gmail.com) wrote: I'd suggest -+.if defined(WITHOUT_DEBUG) ++.if !defined(WITH_DEBUG) DEBUG knob is assumed to defauly to false, this WITH_DEBUG is checked everywhere. See `grep -R _DEBUG /usr/ports/Mk` -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A

Re: TeXLive

Romain Tartière wrote: > Well, I don't think of importing TeXLive into the FreeBSD ports tree as > a replacement of teTeX (sorry if that was unclear by what I meant by > "drop-in replacement"). I was just thinking about having both in the > ports tree, leaving existing dependencies untouched so t

Re: TeXLive

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hello Romain, Thank you for the interesting analysis and for renewing the discussion about TeXLive on FreeBSD. On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:10:12 +0100 Romain Tartière wrote: [...] > 1. TeXLive should be very modular > > It is then possible

Re: TeXLive

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 00:32:46 +0900 (JST) Hiroki Sato wrote: > I have three sort of experimental ports of texlive now; the first is > a large one, the second is completely-modularized one, and the last > is a combination of modularized binari