On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 02:23:55AM -0500, Parv wrote:
> Ruby is CRUCIAL for things portupgrade but not portmanager. For the
right. mixed the two...
> > Good luck there are almost no dependencies for ruby itself:
>
> Indeed, unlike python or the pig that is gnome.
Yeah gnome. I think portupgrad
I get the following error each time i group reply to Scott's posts.
Is it just me, or doesn't cs.niu.edu like to receive mails in general?
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]: 550 5.7.1 <[EMAIL
I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's
not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well. My question is
what's the procedure in such a case? Should I submit them both as
part of the same pr? Obviously the one can't be committed without
the other.
--
Thanks,
Hello,
I'm the author of the FGA library and I accidentally found it packaged
for FreeBSD.
First of all I'd like to thank you, I' ve been a FreeBSD user and I'm
glad to see my work in the ports.
At the same time I inform you that version 1.0 is available, with some
performance optimizations con
Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's
> not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well. My question is
> what's the procedure in such a case? Should I submit them both as
> part of the same pr? Obviously the one can
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 10:53:03AM -0600, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's
> not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well. My question is
> what's the procedure in such a case? Should I submit them both as
> part of the same pr? O
Josh Paetzel schrieb:
I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's
not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well. My question is
what's the procedure in such a case? Should I submit them both as
part of the same pr? Obviously the one can't be committed without
th
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:53:03 -0600 Josh Paetzel wrote:
> I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's
> not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well. My question is
> what's the procedure in such a case? Should I submit them both as
> part of the same pr? Obvious
I have a question about QT4. I use some programs, which are depends on
QT4 toolkit.
E.g. one of the best bittorrent clients - qbittorrent-0.8.0. I want to
submit them to freebsd
ports tree but i see no QT4 support. What i need to do to push this
ports into the tree?
___
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 Parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>wrote Armin Arh thusly...
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:21:22PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> > The portmanager program wants to upgrade ruby18. Is is safe to
>> > let it? I made the mistake of try
Hi Karel,
while resurrecting textproc/xmlada, I've encountered one rather stupid
problem I can't find a reasonable solution for. In the last phase of
building libxmlada_unicode.so.2.0.1, I end up with the following error:
[root@ /usr/ports/textproc/xmlada/work/xmlada-gpl-2.0.1]#
gnatmake -Punicod
> GNAT/GPL and GNAT/GCC are two different products. I made
> gnat-gcc* ports as an experimental alternative to the gnat
> port (GNAT 2005/GPL). They are not meant to be complete or
> supported neither they are expected to pass all the tests.
> These are actually not the problems of the porting proc
Petr Holub wrote:
Hi Karel,
while resurrecting textproc/xmlada, I've encountered one rather stupid
problem I can't find a reasonable solution for. In the last phase of
building libxmlada_unicode.so.2.0.1, I end up with the following error:
/usr/ports/textproc/xmlada/work/xmlada-gpl-2.0.1
On Sunday 24 December 2006 03:53, Alex Samorukov wrote:
> I have a question about QT4. I use some programs, which are depends on
> QT4 toolkit.
> E.g. one of the best bittorrent clients - qbittorrent-0.8.0. I want to
> submit them to freebsd
> ports tree but i see no QT4 support. What i need to do
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Scott Bennett thusly...
>
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 Parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> >portmanager OPTIONALLY needs ruby to convert
> >pkgtools.conf (portupgrade) to its configuration format (by way
> >of running pkgtools-to-portmanager.rb).
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Parv thusly...
> {PAGER:-less} "$src/programmer-notes.txt" # search 'pkgtools'
Curses, forgot a symbol! Above should be ...
${PAGER:-less} "$src/programmer-notes.txt" # search 'pkgtools'
- Parv
--
___
freeb
16 matches
Mail list logo
