Thanks for all your suggestions!
Cheers,
Jan Henrik
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
If prefix works without the CONFIGURE_ARGS then take it out. I put that line
in when experimenting with making it datadir safe.
The capitalization is my one-person campaign, so I fully expected it to be
ignored!
Chris
Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote, but K-9 can't yet
On 01/23/2011 17:35, Chris Rees wrote:
On 23 January 2011 16:24, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
On 01/23/2011 11:42, Chris Rees wrote:
Take a look at the new patch so far; I'm still working on Busybox at
the moment, so I'm afraid I can't step too much more through it, but
Just a question about
On 23 January 2011 16:24, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> On 01/23/2011 11:42, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> Take a look at the new patch so far; I'm still working on Busybox at
>> the moment, so I'm afraid I can't step too much more through it, but
>
> Just a question about what you did so far: Why the
>
On 01/23/2011 11:42, Chris Rees wrote:
Take a look at the new patch so far; I'm still working on Busybox at
the moment, so I'm afraid I can't step too much more through it, but
Just a question about what you did so far: Why the
"CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--prefix=${PREFIX}"? I have tested with a differe
On 22 January 2011 16:28, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 22 January 2011 15:13, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
The DATADIR whines are addressed in this patch, have a look:
http://www.bayofrum.net/~chris/patches/xournal-pkg-plist.diff
>>
>> Thanks, but since the port does not honor DATADIR, it
On 22 January 2011 15:13, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
>>> The DATADIR whines are addressed in this patch, have a look:
>>>
>>> http://www.bayofrum.net/~chris/patches/xournal-pkg-plist.diff
>
> Thanks, but since the port does not honor DATADIR, it should not be there --
> or the DATADIR case must b
On 01/22/2011 14:04, Chris Rees wrote:
On 22 January 2011 12:53, Chris Rees wrote:
On 21 January 2011 21:46, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Finally, I found an application worse having that is not in ports and looked
simple enough to try: Xournal is my first attempt to create a new port.
I foll
On 22 January 2011 12:53, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 21 January 2011 21:46, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
>> Finally, I found an application worse having that is not in ports and looked
>> simple enough to try: Xournal is my first attempt to create a new port.
>>
>> I followed the handbook and did the
On 21 January 2011 21:46, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> Finally, I found an application worse having that is not in ports and looked
> simple enough to try: Xournal is my first attempt to create a new port.
>
> I followed the handbook and did the basic testing with porttools: There are
> warnings
Finally, I found an application worse having that is not in ports and
looked simple enough to try: Xournal is my first attempt to create a new
port.
I followed the handbook and did the basic testing with porttools: There
are warnings about considering to use DATADIR if the port was
DATADIR-sa
11 matches
Mail list logo
