On 23 January 2011 16:24, Jan Henrik Sylvester <m...@janh.de> wrote: > On 01/23/2011 11:42, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> Take a look at the new patch so far; I'm still working on Busybox at >> the moment, so I'm afraid I can't step too much more through it, but > > Just a question about what you did so far: Why the > "CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--prefix=${PREFIX}"? I have tested with a different PREFIX > before and it was successful -- that is what the second part of the > REINPLACE accomplished. What does your line improve? > > Or is it a first step, if I wanted to make the port DATADIR-safe? > >> it should give you a little more to work on. I've tidied the REINPLACE >> lines for you too. > > Thanks, that is better to read. > >> http://www.bayofrum.net/~chris/patches/xournal.diff >> >> DATADIR-safe appears unnecessary according to the conversation >> http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg08234.html >> , so I think that this port should be fine as is right now. Try >> submitting it, it should be fine. > > That is what I thought and since I would have to patch the source (at least > main.c) and the Mafile(s), I did not consider it to be worse it, since I do > not believe anyone will ever use a different DATADIR for this port. > > That leads to my second question: Is your proposal to replace the > "share/xournal" in pkg-plist by "%%DATADIR%%" correct although the port is > not DATADIR-safe? Currently, if DATADIR is set the port ends up to be > installed with wrong +CONTENTS, since the installation ignores DATADIR being > set, but +CONTENTS uses it. > > I believe that it is correct what portlint says: "If and only if your port > is DATADIR-safe (that is, a user can override DATADIR when building this > port and the port will still work correctly) consider using DATADIR macro; > if you are unsure if this port is DATADIR-safe, then ignore this warning". > Thus, there should not be DATADIR in my pkg-plist as long as the port is not > DATADIR-safe. >
Perhaps you should ignore the portlint warnings and leave it as share/xournal then. If you stick up a PR with it attached, it looked absolutely fine by me either way! Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"