FreeBSD Free_BSD_13 13.0-STABLE FreeBSD 13.0-STABLE #20
stable/13-n245022-7d588615865: Tue Mar 23 14:01:24 EDT 2021
root@Free_BSD_13:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 1300500
portupgrade recently broke due to ruby update
Traceback (most recent call last):
13: from /usr
Hello,
I am working on creating a new port for aws-codedeploy-agent
(https://github.com/aws/aws-codedeploy-agent). I am able to get it
build and run successfully on my end manually, I have also verified that
deployments triggered via AWS codedeploy work with this agent on EC2
instances runnin
ifying: wrong number of arguments
(given 2, expected 1) (ArgumentError) in
/var/ports/distfiles/rubygem/asciidoctor-2.0.10.gem
*** Error code 1
I saw a similar problem with gitlab-ce in the upgrade to 13.6.0.
The cause of this error for gitlab was, that is requires ruby 2.7 and
does not work a
From: KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko
Subject: devel/ruby-gems strange ?
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:09:58 +0900
> Hi all,
>
> devel/ruby-gems can't install because of rack of stuffs:
>
(snip)
>
> Is this ruby-gems corrupted ?
Yes, currently devel/ruby-gems is broken with lang/ruby30.
Hi all,
devel/ruby-gems can't install because of rack of stuffs:
--
RubyGems installed the following executables:
/var/ports/work/usr/ports/devel/ruby-gems/work/stage/usr/local/bin/gem30
/bin/ln -sf gem30
Le 16/10/2019 à 09:02, David Demelier a écrit :
Le 15/10/2019 à 18:41, Steve Wills a écrit :
I disagree with the idea that we can have simply one version of Ruby
in ports. Look at all the work it takes to move an app like GitLab to
a new version of Ruby:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab
Le 15/10/2019 à 18:41, Steve Wills a écrit :
I disagree with the idea that we can have simply one version of Ruby in
ports. Look at all the work it takes to move an app like GitLab to a new
version of Ruby:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/41825
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org
Le 14/10/2019 à 18:37, Koichiro Iwao a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 07:34:27AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
Hi,
On 9/17/19 2:40 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have
a big impact on build time and ressources required for building
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 07:34:27AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/17/19 2:40 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> >
> > What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have
> > a big impact on build time and ressources required for building.
>
Le 17/09/2019 à 08:40, Mathieu Arnold a écrit :
What we are all trying to say is that adding flavors for ruby will have
a big impact on build time and ressources required for building.
If all you want is to have ruby flavors for the kicks of it, then I am
glad to tell you that no, it will not
of us contorting our
> systems with different versions of the "same" software
>
> I suppose if the ruby developers make such a substantial change to the
> language that applications break, then adding flavors to ruby might be
> worthwhile. As stated, there is substantial eff
verly
impacted during the upgrade transition where some fraction of their
applications would fail. Flavours, though I didn't appreciate it at the
time, was/is a really smart move and has saved most of us contorting our
systems with different versions of the "same" software
I suppose if
d when people utilize the paradigm incorrectly. It’s a
> > > > bitter pill, but it’s accepted because the use-case for multiple
> > > > concurrent python versions is essential.
> > > >
> > > > As Antoine said, inconsistency isn’t a strong enough use c
d because the use-case for multiple
> > > concurrent python versions is essential.
> > >
> > > As Antoine said, inconsistency isn’t a strong enough use case. Which
> > > brings us back to the original question: is there a specific use-case for
> > > concurre
Antoine said, inconsistency isn’t a strong enough use case. Which brings
> > us back to the original question: is there a specific use-case for
> > concurrent ruby that makes the substantial increase in cognitive load,
> > complexity, and monitoring worth it?
>
> PHP also
iginal question: is there a specific use-case for concurrent
> ruby that makes the substantial increase in cognitive load, complexity, and
> monitoring worth it?
PHP also have FLAVORS. What about PHP? Multiple concurrent PHP versions
is essential?
--
meta
and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby?
> >
> > I know the importance of Python 2. Even if it is EoL-ed, it will be
> > required over the next a few years because not a few applications don't
> > migrate to Python 3. So that's true and reasonab
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:14:01AM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
> We provide multiple versions of Ruby, it would make sense to provide gems
> for each version. In fact, I worked on this but never finished it:
>
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1
>
> Steve
That's nice. I
> On Sep 13, 2019, at 22:27, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>> Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7
>> and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby?
>
> I k
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 6:27 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7
> > and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby?
>
> I know the i
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7
> and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby?
I know the importance of Python 2. Even if it is EoL-ed, it will be
required over the next
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:06 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:45 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:45 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports.
> >
> > AFAIK multiple version of Ruby ports (lang/ruby??) can be ins
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:45 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports.
>
> AFAIK multiple version of Ruby ports (lang/ruby??) can be installed at
> the same time. One of these ruby ports will be *default* installed as
>
Hi,
I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports.
AFAIK multiple version of Ruby ports (lang/ruby??) can be installed at
the same time. One of these ruby ports will be *default* installed as
PREFIX/bin/ruby. In contrast of Ruby lang, rubygem ports cannot be
installed for multiple
Am 20.04.2019 um 13:56 schrieb Hajimu UMEMOTO:
> w.schwarzenfeld> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb
>
> w.schwarzenfeld> ===>>> This port is marked BROKEN
> w.schwarzenfeld> ===>>> does not build with Ruby 2.5
>
>
Thanks! Builds fine without DOCS=on.
With DOCS=on
/usr/bin/strip
/ram/usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb/work/stage/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.5/amd64-freebsd11/bdb.so
/bin/mkdir -p
/ram/usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb/work/stage/usr/local/share/doc/ruby25/bdb/doc
(cd /ram/usr/ports/databases/ruby
Hi,
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2019 22:00:46 +1000
> Kubilay Kocak said:
koobs> Issue reported/tracked here:
koobs> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237410
Okay, I commented to this issue report.
Thank you for letting me know.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO
u...@mahoroba.org u.
On 20/04/2019 9:56 pm, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 20 Apr 2019 06:59:16 +0200
Walter Schwarzenfeld said:
w.schwarzenfeld> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb
w.schwarzenfeld> ===>>> This port is marked BROKEN
w.schwarzenfeld> ===&
Hi,
>>>>> On Sat, 20 Apr 2019 06:59:16 +0200
>>>>> Walter Schwarzenfeld said:
w.schwarzenfeld> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb
w.schwarzenfeld> ===>>> This port is marked BROKEN
w.schwarzenfeld> ===>>&
Has nothing to do with portmaster, and poudriere would not help if the
source uses wrong functions and/or parameters.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
Am 20.04.19 um 11:05 schrieb Matthias Fechner:
> Am 20.04.2019 um 06:59 schrieb Walter Schwarzenfeld:
>> After this change:
>>
>> |portmaster -R -r ruby-2.5|
>>
>> |
>> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb
>>
>> ==
Am 20.04.2019 um 06:59 schrieb Walter Schwarzenfeld:
> After this change:
>
> |portmaster -R -r ruby-2.5|
>
> |
> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb
>
> ===>>> This port is marked BROKEN
> ===>>> does not build with R
After this change:
|portmaster -R -r ruby-2.5|
|
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb
===>>> This port is marked BROKEN
===>>> does not build with Ruby 2.5
===>>> If you are sure you can build it, remove the
BROKE
This breaks portupgrade.
portupgrade requires ruby-bdb and it is marked broken for ruby2.5:
BROKEN_RUBY25= yes
so it’s back to 2.4 for me:)
> On Apr 19, 2019, at 3:53 PM, Matthias Fechner wrote:
>
> Am 19.04.2019 um 17:43 schrieb Steve Wills:
>> Yeah, it's fine, do it,
Am 19.04.2019 um 17:43 schrieb Steve Wills:
> Yeah, it's fine, do it, just be sure to add an UPDATING entry similar
> to previous entries for changing ruby default version.
thanks, committed with 499391.
Gruß
Matthias
--
"Programming today is a race between software engin
ld have done it in
> January, but was waiting for other things such as GitLab to catch
> up/officially support it.
I marked them broken with 2.5 and referred to this PR.
So we should be save to switch ruby default version to 2.5?
Gruß
Matthias
--
"Programming today is a race between s
Dear all,
regarding this PR:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237222
and confirmation from gitlab developers here:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/60704
www/gitlab-ce requires at least ruby 2.5.x.
Is there a possibility to change the default version for ruby in
From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 01:48:16 +0900 (JST)
> From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
> Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 16:07:01 +0900 (JST)
&g
From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 16:07:01 +0900 (JST)
> https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/ports/lang_ruby26.20190105.patch
>
> Please take following step to apply this patch.
>
> 1. cd /usr/ports
>
From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 10:35:14 +0900 (JST)
> Thank you for reply. Then I'm going to create full port and post here
> again.
Created.
https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/ports/lang_ruby26.20190105.pa
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 5:27 PM Pete Wright wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/29/18 5:35 PM, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> > From: Adam Weinberger
> > Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
> > Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 15:34:17 -0700
> >
> >>
m Weinberger
> >>> Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
> >>> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 15:34:17 -0700
> >>>
> >>>> I think perhaps it's worth considering doing the opposite and,
> >>>> beginning with
On 12/30/18 4:31 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 5:27 PM Pete Wright wrote:
On 12/29/18 5:35 PM, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
From: Adam Weinberger
Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 15:34:17 -0700
I think perhaps it&#
On 12/29/18 5:35 PM, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
From: Adam Weinberger
Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 15:34:17 -0700
I think perhaps it's worth considering doing the opposite and,
beginning with 2.6, install the entire standard libra
From: Adam Weinberger
Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 15:34:17 -0700
> I think perhaps it's worth considering doing the opposite and,
> beginning with 2.6, install the entire standard library by default.
> Gems and stdlib exis
On 12/29/18 2:34 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 6:20 AM Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
Hello all,
Ruby 2.6.0 is released and I tried porting it.
After creating start point by 'svn copy lang/ruby25 lang/ruby26', I
made following changes.
https://www.utahime.org/Fre
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 6:20 AM Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Ruby 2.6.0 is released and I tried porting it.
>
> After creating start point by 'svn copy lang/ruby25 lang/ruby26', I
> made following changes.
>
> https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/po
Hello all,
Ruby 2.6.0 is released and I tried porting it.
After creating start point by 'svn copy lang/ruby25 lang/ruby26', I
made following changes.
https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/ports/lang_ruby26.patch
It is build successfully and works fine on 12.0-RELEASE amd64. But
there is
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 16:44:01 +
tech-lists wrote:
> Hi,
I missed the UPDATING entry 20180214 concerning ruby. sorry for the
noise!
--
J.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
Hi,
context is 12.0-BETA3 r340208 GENERIC amd64
ports is Revision: 484403
nothing pertaining to openssl in make.conf or src.conf
I ran make check-old and yes | make delete-old and yes | make
delete-old-libs then rebooted before attempting to upgrade ruby
# openssl version
OpenSSL 1.1.1-freebsd
Working now, thanks for the quick fix.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Christoph Moench-Tegeder
wrote:
> ## AN (a.n...@ieee.org):
>
>> After a recent update to ports I'm suddenly receiving the following
>> when trying to use portupgrade.
>>
>> # portupgrade -
## AN (a.n...@ieee.org):
> After a recent update to ports I'm suddenly receiving the following
> when trying to use portupgrade.
>
> # portupgrade -va
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.4/pkgtools/portsdb.rb:118:in `block (2
> levels) in fill': MOVED file format erro
compiler
and linker flags
# pkg info | grep ruby
ruby-2.4.4_2,1 Object-oriented interpreted scripting language
ruby24-bdb-0.6.6_5 Ruby interface to Oracle Berkeley DB
revision 2 or later
After a recent update to ports I'm suddenly receiving the following
when trying t
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 18:28 +, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> > > than
> > > nothing. It now runs and does what you´d expect :)
> > >
> > > I have attached it to this email.
> > Thanks! Now we should try to integrate it into the passenger itself
> > :)
>
On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 18:28 +, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > How do I interpret the output of 'procstat -v ' though? Can
> > > I
> > > sum
> > > up all of the RES or PRES numbers to get the total virtual memory
> > > that
> > > this proce
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
> > How do I interpret the output of 'procstat -v ' though? Can I
> > sum
> > up all of the RES or PRES numbers to get the total virtual memory
> > that
> > this process is consuming?
>
> I hacked at it a bit and came up with an updated patch that include
d files/patch-bin_passenger-recycler in
> > > the
> > > port I've sent before:
> > >
> > > --- bin/passenger-recycler.orig 2018-02-20 21:09:18 UTC
> > > +++ bin/passenger-recycler
> > > @@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ def process_status?(pid)
> > >
0 @@ def process_status?(pid)
> > end
> >
> > require 'phusion_passenger'
> > +PhusionPassenger.locate_directories
> > require 'phusion_passenger/platform_info'
> > require 'phusion_passenger/platform_info/ruby'
> > requ
rig 2018-02-20 21:09:18 UTC
> +++ bin/passenger-recycler
> @@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ def process_status?(pid)
> end
>
> require 'phusion_passenger'
> +PhusionPassenger.locate_directories
> require 'phusion_passenger/platform_info'
> require 'phusion_pa
er
> installation issues, but here it is:
No, you´re right, it didn´t fix the issue:
# /usr/local/bin/passenger-recycler
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4/gems/foreman_maintain-0.1.3/bin/passenger-recycler:10:
warning: already initialized constant CONFIG
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4/gems/foreman_m
er-recycler
@@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ def process_status?(pid)
end
require 'phusion_passenger'
+PhusionPassenger.locate_directories
require 'phusion_passenger/platform_info'
require 'phusion_passenger/platform_info/ruby'
require 'phusion_passenger/admin_tools/memory_stat
sed 's/^X//' >rubygem-foreman_maintain/pkg-descr <<
'9944d73c5ee733bda3fa3a0bea6fbf70'
XA maintenance tool for Foreman/Satellite Ruby applications
X
XWWW: https://github.com/theforeman/foreman_maintain
9944d73c5ee733bda3fa3a0bea6fbf70
exit
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 07:50 +, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Den 18 feb. 2018 23:49 skrev Marcin Cieslak :
> > On Sat, 17 Feb 2018, Karli Sjöberg via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > CONFIG
> >
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
>
>
> Den 18 feb. 2018 23:49 skrev Marcin Cieslak :
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2018, Karli Sjöberg via freebsd-ports wrote:
> CONFIG
> >
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4/gems/foreman_maintain-0.1.3/bin/passenger-recycler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
tory of it all is that I have a Foreman server that
> is eating all of my RAM, basically no matter how much I give it. I´ve
> written to the devs and they say it´s wrong, it shouldn´t be doing
> that, it´s not a feature :) So they gave me a ruby script that fires
> from cron every 5
how much I give it. I´ve
written to the devs and they say it´s wrong, it shouldn´t be doing
that, it´s not a feature :) So they gave me a ruby script that fires
from cron every 5 mins that checks if there are any passenger processes
that are going bananas and kills them. It´s not a cure, just a
worka
On 01/06/18 14:17, Kevin Oberman wrote:
You seem to assume that Ubuntu and FreeBSD both have the same version
of Ruby installed. The current version in FreeBSD is 2.4.3. 2.3 is
still available as lang/ruby23, but should only be used when some code
won't work with 2.4. The Ubuntu syst
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Yuri wrote:
> In order to get a Ruby version, I run this command:
>
> > $ ruby -r rbconfig -e 'C = RbConfig::CONFIG' -e 'puts C["ruby_version"]'
>
> > 2.4
>
>
> However, on Ubuntu 17.10 the same comman
In order to get a Ruby version, I run this command:
> $ ruby -r rbconfig -e 'C = RbConfig::CONFIG' -e 'puts C["ruby_version"]'
> 2.4
However, on Ubuntu 17.10 the same command returns 2.3.0 (with the minor
version of zero).
My question is which one is c
Hello
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 07:01:39PM -0500, Josh Endries wrote:
> I recently updated packages on a 11.0 machine, which upgraded Ruby from
> 2.3.5 to 2.3.6 (I think), and my Puppet install broke. It is logging
> SSL-related issues with this message:
>
> SSL_read: decryptio
I recently updated packages on a 11.0 machine, which upgraded Ruby from
2.3.5 to 2.3.6 (I think), and my Puppet install broke. It is logging
SSL-related issues with this message:
SSL_read: decryption failed or bad record mac
I thought maybe it was a problem with outdated OpenSSL so I updated to
the change from docs to manpages makes sense. of course, what i
especially like is the diff to pkg-plist :)
i am being patient
randy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, sen
There is an even better approach of the patch currently reviewed:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D11823
Also there is an PR:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221178
So if nothing happen, there will be a maintainer timeout which implicit
approves the commit. Also the maintainer is
I'm waiting for approval by sunpoet (maintainer).
On 29.07.2017 04:29, Randy Bush wrote:
repo head is 446595, which does not have this patch. i plead for
someone to commit? pretty please? :)
thanks
randy
Attached an updated patch. I will also send it to sunpoet (maintainer)
and will ask fo
repo head is 446595, which does not have this patch. i plead for
someone to commit? pretty please? :)
thanks
randy
> Attached an updated patch. I will also send it to sunpoet (maintainer)
> and will ask for approval.
>
> Greetings,
> Torsten
> --
> Support me at:
> https://www.patreon.com/To
Aloha,
it just wanted an upgrade of libidn2, but decided to install ruby and
all her friends
===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed:
Upgrade libidn2-2.0.2 to libidn2-2.0.3
Install textproc/rubygem-ronn
Install devel/
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017, Randy Bush wrote:
it just wanted an upgrade of libidn2, but decided to install ruby and
all her friends
===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed:
Upgrade libidn2-2.0.2 to libi
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017, Randy Bush wrote:
it just wanted an upgrade of libidn2, but decided to install ruby and
all her friends
===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed:
Upgrade libidn2-2.0.2 to libidn2-2.0.3
Install textproc/rub
On 26.07.2017 09:11, Randy Bush wrote:
it just wanted an upgrade of libidn2, but decided to install ruby and
all her friends
===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed:
Upgrade libidn2-2.0.2 to libidn2-2.0.3
Install textproc/rub
it just wanted an upgrade of libidn2, but decided to install ruby and
all her friends
===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed:
Upgrade libidn2-2.0.2 to libidn2-2.0.3
Install textproc/rubygem-ronn
Install devel/
Hi,
On 02/09/2017 09:55, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>
> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ruby=2.3
Err, yeah, sorry, was too early for me... Thanks for the correction.
Steve
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Steve Wills skrev:
>
> Hi,
> On 02/08/2017 11:20, Gerard Seibert wrote:
>> On or about 20170109, the default version of ruby was updated from 2.2
>> to 2.3. However, "pkg install" wants to install version 2.2 for ports
>> that require ruby. Is there a way to
Hi,
On 02/08/2017 11:20, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> On or about 20170109, the default version of ruby was updated from 2.2
> to 2.3. However, "pkg install" wants to install version 2.2 for ports
> that require ruby. Is there a way to override this behavior?
>
The packa
On or about 20170109, the default version of ruby was updated from 2.2
to 2.3. However, "pkg install" wants to install version 2.2 for ports
that require ruby. Is there a way to override this behavior?
--
Carmel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.o
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:23:28PM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Is a binary available for Ruby?
http://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:9:i386/latest/All/ruby-2.2.6,1.txz
http://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:9:i386/latest/All/ruby23-2.3.1_1,1.txz
http://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:9:amd64/latest/All/ruby-2.2.
Is a binary available for Ruby? System is (currently) 9.3-RELEASE-p43
(soon to go to 10 when I get a new server one day). It's not possible to
compile the thing on my (minimal) box, as it keeps blowing away swap.
The only reason I need Ruby (I don't even know the language) is that
w any of those
> symptoms. I build it regularly on a relatively low spec box (AMD G-T40E
> Processor (1000.02-MHz K8-class CPU) with 4Gb RAM). Which version of
> Ruby and which version of FreeBSD?
Current Ruby is ruby-2.0.0.576_1,1, trying to go to ruby23-2.3.1_1,1 .
It regularly blo
it blew out my swap space!
>
> On my box /tmp is "tmpfs" i.e. use memory first before overflowing into
> swap; that's going to be trickier to fix... I guess I'll have to kludge
> /tmp as a symlink into /usr/local or something, where I have heaps of
> room.
The size of
On 2016-Oct-07 17:35:10 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>Looks like I need to upgrade it for security issues; so I tried to compile
>it from the ports area.
>
>First it blew out my disk space (the "work" sub-directory), so when I
>rearranged a few things to make more room it blew out my swap space!
out my swap space!
>
Not sure what's going on with yours, but mine doesn't show any of those
symptoms. I build it regularly on a relatively low spec box (AMD G-T40E
Processor (1000.02-MHz K8-class CPU) with 4Gb RAM). Which version of
Ruby
memory first before overflowing into
swap; that's going to be trickier to fix... I guess I'll have to kludge
/tmp as a symlink into /usr/local or something, where I have heaps of
room.
On the other hand I guess I could figure out what requires Ruby, and
decide whether I really need i
Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote on 02/23/2016 16:13:
Hello Miroslav,
On 23.02.2016 15:47, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Steve Wills wrote on 02/17/2016 06:47:
Hi,
Just FYI, baring any objections or major issues coming up, I plan to
make Ruby 2.2 the default Ruby in the ports tree on March 1.
Puppet
Hello Miroslav,
On 23.02.2016 15:47, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Steve Wills wrote on 02/17/2016 06:47:
Hi,
Just FYI, baring any objections or major issues coming up, I plan to
make Ruby 2.2 the default Ruby in the ports tree on March 1.
Puppet users in particular probably want to migrate to
Steve Wills wrote on 02/17/2016 06:47:
Hi,
Just FYI, baring any objections or major issues coming up, I plan to
make Ruby 2.2 the default Ruby in the ports tree on March 1.
Puppet users in particular probably want to migrate to sysutils/puppet4
or work on testing some sort of patch that makes
Hi,
Just FYI, baring any objections or major issues coming up, I plan to
make Ruby 2.2 the default Ruby in the ports tree on March 1.
No objections here. :)
Greetings,
Torsten
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org
Hi,
Just FYI, baring any objections or major issues coming up, I plan to
make Ruby 2.2 the default Ruby in the ports tree on March 1.
Puppet users in particular probably want to migrate to sysutils/puppet4
or work on testing some sort of patch that makes puppet 3.x work with
ruby 2.2 before then
Hi!
> I'm looking for a committer for this.
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199436
Done.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
1 - 100 of 408 matches
Mail list logo
