On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:02:41 -0400
Ed Maste wrote:
> Colin (cperciva) and I are making good progress on the portsnap build
> infrastructure Git migration. I'll follow up when it is back in
> operation.
Thank you!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing l
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 11:02:55 -0700
Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> portsnap is a shell script where fetch is used for downloads.
It uses fetch for some things, but fetching the actual updates uses
phttpget(8) which supports pipelined HTTP requests.
_
On 12/28/20 6:06 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> Kudos to Stefan for keeping portmaster relevant and up-to-date.
>> But I never understood the appeal of portsnap. What's the advantage over
>
>> svnlite co ...
>> cd /usr/ports; make update
>
>> This mechanism is in the base system, so an extra tool dem
> Kudos to Stefan for keeping portmaster relevant and up-to-date.
> But I never understood the appeal of portsnap. What's the advantage over
> svnlite co ...
> cd /usr/ports; make update
> This mechanism is in the base system, so an extra tool demands some
> justification ;-)
> Kind regards,
> P
Hi all,
> Am 28.12.2020 um 16:38 schrieb Kevin Oberman :
>
> portsnap(8) predates svnlite by quite a bit, but you have just described
> why it is not really worth the overhead of maintaining it. As bugzilla
> describes many ticket closures, Overcome by events".
Somehow I must have missed/skipped
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 4:37 AM Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > Am 26.12.2020 um 20:04 schrieb LuMiWa via freebsd-ports <
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>:
> > ...and I will continue to use portmaster. But I don't understand why
> > we should no keep portsnap.
>
> Kudos to Stefan for keeping
Hi all,
> Am 26.12.2020 um 20:04 schrieb LuMiWa via freebsd-ports
> :
> ...and I will continue to use portmaster. But I don't understand why
> we should no keep portsnap.
Kudos to Stefan for keeping portmaster relevant and up-to-date.
But I never understood the appeal of portsnap. What's the adv
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020, 20:04 LuMiWa via freebsd-ports <
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 19:51:37 +0100
> Stefan Esser wrote:
>
> > Am 26.12.20 um 18:41 schrieb LuMiWa via freebsd-ports:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Today I red again an email:
> > >
> > > Subject:[HEADS UP] Pla
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 19:51:37 +0100
Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 26.12.20 um 18:41 schrieb LuMiWa via freebsd-ports:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Today I red again an email:
> >
> > Subject:[HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap
> > From: Steve Wills
> > Date: 2020-08-04 18:43:20
> >
> > An
Am 26.12.20 um 18:41 schrieb LuMiWa via freebsd-ports:
Hi!
Today I red again an email:
Subject:[HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap
From: Steve Wills
Date: 2020-08-04 18:43:20
And as portsnap user I have a question: Do they planning deprecation of
portmaster too?
No, I
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 9:42 AM LuMiWa via freebsd-ports <
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Today I red again an email:
>
> Subject:[HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap
> From: Steve Wills
> Date: 2020-08-04 18:43:20
>
> And as portsnap user I have a question: Do
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:44:27 -0700, John Kennedy stated:
>On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:17:35PM +, Pau Amma wrote:
>> On 2020-09-18 17:58, Carmel NY wrote:
>> > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated:
>> >> See
>> >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbo
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:17:35PM +, Pau Amma wrote:
> On 2020-09-18 17:58, Carmel NY wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated:
> >> See
> >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree
> >> and th
On 2020-09-18 17:58, Carmel NY wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated:
See
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree
and the next sections.
According to the above page, "The most straightforward wa
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:58:29PM -0400, Carmel NY wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated:
> >On 2020-09-18 11:14, Carmel NY wrote:
> >> Is 'portsnap'
> >> going to be depreciated?
> >
> >Yes.
> >
> >> If so, when?
> >
> >I believe when 13.0 is released, or already if you
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:58:29PM -0400, Carmel NY wrote:
> ...
> >https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree
> >
> >and the next sections.
>
> According to the above page, "The most straightforward way is to have
> Poud
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated:
>On 2020-09-18 11:14, Carmel NY wrote:
>> Is 'portsnap'
>> going to be depreciated?
>
>Yes.
>
>> If so, when?
>
>I believe when 13.0 is released, or already if you're using a recent
>-current.
>
>> If is is depreciated, how will
>> this affe
On 2020-09-18 11:14, Carmel NY wrote:
Is 'portsnap'
going to be depreciated?
Yes.
If so, when?
I believe when 13.0 is released, or already if you're using a recent
-current.
If is is depreciated, how will
this affect poudriere?
See
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/po
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 10:11:41AM +0200 I heard the voice of
Kurt Jaeger, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> > With a little script to pull the snapdates:
> > [...]
>
> Nice! Can you put that script somewhere for others to use ?
It's pretty small and straightforward. Attached. It _is_ based on a
bit
> Any ideas when this will be fixed ?
>
Looks like it's fixed now.
--
Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682CDCC39DC0FEAE11620B6C746CFA9E74FA4B0
“We are drowning in information but starved for knowledge.” (John
Naisbitt, "Megatrends")
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Yes, looks like it is broken. For me doesn't works from yesterday
morning.
--
“Happiness is the meaning and the purpose of life, the whole aim and
end of human existence.”
― Aristotle
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.or
On 7/3/19 7:15 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 2 Jul 2019, at 18:33, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
>> I noticed portsnap mirror is outdated for few hours now:
>
> Out of date based on what? How often are you pulling portsnap?
>
> (I run portsnap cron update once a day)
I pull few times a day, and it's usually
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 07:45:26PM -0600 I heard the voice of
@lbutlr, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Out of date based on what? How often are you pulling portsnap?
With a little script to pull the snapdates:
% ./psinfo.pl
your-org: Sun Jun 30 19:26:35 2019 (2 days, 01:24:42 ago)
On 2 Jul 2019, at 18:33, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
> I noticed portsnap mirror is outdated for few hours now:
Out of date based on what? How often are you pulling portsnap?
(I run portsnap cron update once a day)
--
THEY ARE LAUGHING AT ME, NOT WITH ME Bart chalkboard Ep. 7G12
_
"Alex V. Petrov" writes:
> How often should the portsnap database be updated?
> Why is it not updated a long time sometimes?
>
> Now:
> Updating from Tue Aug 21 12:22:20 +07 2018 to Wed Aug 22 02:34:43 +07 2018.
Fourteen hours? I do not think of that as "a long time."
___
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 16:49:13 -0600
Gary Aitken wrote:
> Is portsnap supposed to honor WORKDIR and PORTSDIR?
>
> These are defined in /etc/portsnap.conf, and it's not clear to me
> whether they are honored only via the .conf file or whether they
> are supposed to be honored from the environment as
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017, RW via freebsd-ports wrote:
> If you mean files under /var/db/portsnap/files/ then these are not
> temporary files, they are the compressed snapshot, and you should not
> delete them without very good reason. They are supposed to persist and
> may remain unmodified for many mon
Sigh... It seems those files were needed after all, as they must refer
to the current system; chalk it up to my lack of understanding of how
"portsnap" works. I got them back (plus more besides) from a backup
on my MacBook. What freaked me out was actually looking at the list of
files being bac
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:51:44 +1100 (EST)
Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean
> up /var/db/portsnap/files? I've just had to remove a zillion of them,
> a bunch at a time because "rm" choked on the arg list.
If you mean files under /var/db/portsnap/files/ then these
On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, Xin LI wrote:
> Because the files are still being used? What makes you believe they are
> unused, by the way?
How would I tell? Some were there since last October, surviving a few
reboots...
What I do see is the INDEX file containing "...|$tmpfile"; could that be
the pro
Dave Horsfall wrote:
(Many responses)
I note that no-one has answered the question which caused me to post the
message in the first place viz: why weren't the files being removed
automatically? Everyone appears to have missed this point...
I didn't and some of the answers are helpful even if n
Because the files are still being used? What makes you believe they are
unused, by the way?
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> (Many responses)
>
> I note that no-one has answered the question which caused me to post the
> message in the first place viz: why weren't the file
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 10:34:39 +1100 (EST)
Dave Horsfall wrote:
> (Many responses)
>
> I note that no-one has answered the question which caused me to post
> the message in the first place viz: why weren't the files being
> removed automatically? Everyone appears to have missed this point...
>
D
(Many responses)
I note that no-one has answered the question which caused me to post the
message in the first place viz: why weren't the files being removed
automatically? Everyone appears to have missed this point...
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will s
On 7 January 2017 at 11:30, Bob Eager wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:51:44 +1100 (EST)
> Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
>> Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean
>> up /var/db/portsnap/files? I've just had to remove a zillion of them,
>> a bunch at a time because "rm" choked on the arg list.
>>
>
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:51:44 +1100 (EST)
Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean
> up /var/db/portsnap/files? I've just had to remove a zillion of them,
> a bunch at a time because "rm" choked on the arg list.
>
> Perhaps a "portsnap clean" command? I'm surprised th
On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, olli hauer wrote:
> Why?
For the reason I stated; I had to remove hundreds of them by hand.
> As soon you run "portsnap fetch" old files in this directory are purged!
Not here they weren't...
> If you look into /var/db/portsnap/INDEX you can see the mapping of the
> files
On 2017-01-06 20:51, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean up /var/db/portsnap/files?
> I've just had to remove a zillion of them, a bunch at a time because "rm"
> choked on the arg list.
>
> Perhaps a "portsnap clean" command? I'm surprised that there isn't one
>> Fetching snapshot tag from your-org.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
> IIUC there was an outage on this server and it has been fixed.
how do we apply for refunds? :)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 04:58:56PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> Fetching snapshot tag from your-org.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
IIUC there was an outage on this server and it has been fixed.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.f
On 13/10/2016 6:58 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> a bunch of my 10.3 systems are whining as follows:
>
> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
> Fetching snapshot tag from your-org.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
> Latest snapshot on server is older than what we already have!
> Coward
On 2015-02-22 19:38, Daniel Morante wrote:
> I have a system that started as FreeBSD 5.x. Throughout the years it has
> been updated and upgraded. Today's it's currently at 9.3-RELEASE.
>
> Recently:
>
> "The port www/neon29 was renamed to www/neon and updated to version 0.30.1"
>
> Back in 2
On 02/10/15 16:54, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
> Hi, after installing FreeBSD 10.1 from downloaded DVD image, I
> wanted to update my local portstree, but ...
>
> Today, running "portsnap fetch" fails unexpectedly.
>
> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 7 mirrors found.
> Fetching public ke
Fetching snapshot tag from ec2-eu-west-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
Updating from Fri Mar 21 00:55:47 CET 2014 to Fri Mar 21 01:10:01 CET 2014.
Fetching 1 metadata patches. done.
Applying metadata patches... done.
Fetching 0 metadata files... done.
Fetching 0
Hello,
try this:
rm -R /var/db/fportsnap/files/*.gz
and then launch portsnap fetch another time
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT,
UNIX systems, security and network engineer
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le jeudi 24 octobre 2013 à 11:15 +0200, Łukasz Wąsikowski a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to
于 5/29/13 12:08 AM, Łukasz Wąsikowski 写道:
W dniu 2013-05-28 17:51, Xu Zhe pisze:
I got a task to port Java to a private-built FreeBSD system which is
branched from FreeBSD 8.2. As a start of this, I tried to learn port
stuffs, and did 'portsnap fetch' but failed. After that, I tried to
change p
W dniu 2013-05-28 17:51, Xu Zhe pisze:
> I got a task to port Java to a private-built FreeBSD system which is
> branched from FreeBSD 8.2. As a start of this, I tried to learn port
> stuffs, and did 'portsnap fetch' but failed. After that, I tried to
> change portsnap server, and I even tried a ge
> >Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:01:05 +1100
> How do you work that out? None of the headers you've included show
> any problem. John sent his mail at 010105UT on 21st, and your headers
> say you received it at 095334UT on 21st - nearly 9 hours later. The
> X-Apparently-To header is 010132UT on the
On 21 January 2013 01:01, John Marshall
wrote:
> We are on notice that the current ports tree will be soon no longer
> available via CVSup and friends. General consumers of the FreeBSD ports
> tree are being encouraged to switch to portsnap.
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-an
On 2013-Jan-22 22:45:24 -0500, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>Your date is ahead of what the headers of your message say:
>
>>From owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 09:53:34 2013
>Received: from pop.att.yahoo.com (pop2.sbc.mail.vip.ne1.yahoo.com
>[98.138.197.207])
>by mueller6722.bellsou
> > (current time: Wed 23 Jan 2013 02:43:43 AM UTC) --]
> [-- End of PGP output --]
> [-- The following data is signed --]
> We are on notice that the current ports tree will be soon no longer
> available via CVSup and friends. General consumers of the FreeBSD ports
> tree are being encouraged
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:59:56 +0100
Oliver Lehmann wrote:
>
> "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote:
> > I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will
> > tell me about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine
> > or theirs), selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites my local file.
>
On 01/22/13 17:21, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
On 01/22/13 09:59, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote:
I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will tell me
about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine or theirs),
selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites m
On 01/22/13 09:59, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote:
I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will tell me
about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine or theirs),
selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites my local file.
And when there is no conflict
On 01/22/13 16:59, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote:
I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will tell me
about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine or theirs),
selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites my local file.
And when there is no conflict
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" wrote:
I know when I run it manually and there is a conflict, it will tell
me about a merge-conflict and ask me which file to keep (mine or
theirs), selecting theirs, afaik, overwrites my local file.
And when there is no conflict and it can be merged, you have a merged
On 01/22/13 07:00, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
If you use small modifications on a ingle system(or just a few) you
could track the ports tree with subversion, which will be happy to
keep and try to merge your local modifcations. You can also diff and
revert your modifications usi
On 01/22/13 14:00, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Guido Falsi wrote:
If you use small modifications on a ingle system(or just a few) you
could track the ports tree with subversion, which will be happy to
keep and try to merge your local modifcations. You can also diff and
revert your modifications usi
Guido Falsi wrote:
If you use small modifications on a ingle system(or just a few) you
could track the ports tree with subversion, which will be happy to
keep and try to merge your local modifcations. You can also diff and
revert your modifications using it, which can be quite handy.
Di
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:10:26 +0100
Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in case I made some local modifications to a ports Makefile in
> the past with CVSup it was "easy" to get everything back in-sync by
> just running CVSup. With portsnap fetch update, my modified Makefile
> stays modified. What
On 01/22/13 13:10, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
in case I made some local modifications to a ports Makefile in the
past with CVSup it was "easy" to get everything back in-sync by just
running CVSup. With portsnap fetch update, my modified Makefile stays
modified. What is the suggested way in sy
On 01/22/13 13:10, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
in case I made some local modifications to a ports Makefile in the
past with CVSup it was "easy" to get everything back in-sync by just
running CVSup. With portsnap fetch update, my modified Makefile stays
modified. What is the suggested way in sy
On Sunday 18 November 2012 05:35:30 ajtiM wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am using FreeBSD 9.1 RC-3. All the time I use portsnap. Today I ran
> portsnap fetch && portsnap extract
> and it stopped extract on
> /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer2/
> files/aa53f85d11a3fd077801a5d63b76022647420c8c480f9022315806e911aa33
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:35:30 -0600
ajtiM wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am using FreeBSD 9.1 RC-3. All the time I use portsnap. Today I ran
> portsnap fetch && portsnap extract
> and it stopped extract on
> /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer2/
> files/aa53f85d11a3fd077801a5d63b76022647420c8c480f9022315806e911aa
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Jason Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:13 PM, ajtiM wrote:
>
>> On Monday 12 November 2012 17:46:44 Aldis Berjoza wrote:
>> > 13.11.2012, 01:27, "ajtiM" :
>> > > Hi!
>> > >
>> > > Is it something wrong with portsnap server or is something wrong with
>>
Em Dom, 2012-03-11 às 09:22 -0400, Jerry escreveu:
> Actually, there are numerous "razors", Occam's being only one.
Seems that "Murphy's Law". wins in this case...
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:55:27 -0300
Sergio de Almeida Lenzi articulated:
> Or just that ports system is "frozen" because of the 8.3 release???
>
> Occam's razor:
>
> when you have two or more competing theories
> that make exactly the same predictions,
> the simpler one is the better.
Actually,
On 03/11/12 06:00, Chris Rees wrote:
> CC: portsnap maintainer
Thanks! I don't regularly read freebsd-ports (funny for the portsnap maintainer
to not be subscribed, I know, but I get way too much email already...).
> Although that might be a reasonable explanation, it's much more likely
> that p
On 11/03/2012 12:55, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> Em Dom, 2012-03-11 às 07:38 -0500, ajtiM escreveu:
>
>> On Sunday 11 March 2012 07:05:35 Herby Vojčík wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> for a day already, portsnap fetch seems not to fetch newest changes.
>>> freshports shows lots of changes, port port
On 11 March 2012 12:55, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> Em Dom, 2012-03-11 às 07:38 -0500, ajtiM escreveu:
>
>> On Sunday 11 March 2012 07:05:35 Herby Vojčík wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > for a day already, portsnap fetch seems not to fetch newest changes.
>> > freshports shows lots of changes, po
http://www.rene-ladan.nl/
GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6
(subkeys.pgp.net)
2012/3/11 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi :
> Em Dom, 2012-03-11 às 07:38 -0500, ajtiM escreveu:
>
>> On Sunday 11 March 2012 07:05:35 Herby Vojčík wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > for a day alr
Em Dom, 2012-03-11 às 07:38 -0500, ajtiM escreveu:
> On Sunday 11 March 2012 07:05:35 Herby Vojčík wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > for a day already, portsnap fetch seems not to fetch newest changes.
> > freshports shows lots of changes, port portsnap fetch says there
> > everything is up to date.
> >
On Sunday 11 March 2012 07:05:35 Herby Vojčík wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for a day already, portsnap fetch seems not to fetch newest changes.
> freshports shows lots of changes, port portsnap fetch says there
> everything is up to date.
> I checked that the ports are really newer in freshports than in my
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 08:47:24 +0200
Hartmann, O. articulated:
> This morning, I get this when trying to update the local portssystem:
>
> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... done.
> Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
>
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009, 09:15 -0700, Edward Shriver wrote:
> I am attempting to load FreeBSD-7.0.? The computer I am using has no internet
> connection.? Could you please let me have the location and name of the
> file(s) that portsnap needs to do its 'extract' thing.
On a system that _does_ have I
Desmond da Peoples wrote:
>You need to enable the CVSup file. Look in the handbook for installing the
>ports tree.
>Go to chapter 4.5 in the freebsd handbook and follow the directions there.
>Be sure that you have a good connection.
?! Which part of the OP's "The computer I am using has no intern
You need to enable the CVSup file. Look in the handbook for installing the
ports tree.
Go to chapter 4.5 in the freebsd handbook and follow the directions there.
Be sure that you have a good connection.
> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 09:15:23 -0700
> From: edwar...@yahoo.com
> To: po...@freebsd.org
>
On Sat, 30 May 2009 12:30:05 +0100 RW wrote:
>On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:05:44 +1000
>John Marshall wrote:
>>
>> Have you excluded local factors (proxy servers, firewalls)?
>
>Try fetching the key manually
>
>fetch http://portsnap2.FreeBSD.org/pub.ssl
>
I really suspect that http_proxy h
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:05:44 +1000 John Marshall
wrote:
>On Sat, 30 May 2009, 05:39 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> Thanks for that much, then, Glen. So we still don't know what is wr=
>ong.
>> I did try it again around midnight CDT, and it still failed the same way.
>> In the meant
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:05:44 +1000
John Marshall wrote:
>
> Have you excluded local factors (proxy servers, firewalls)?
Try fetching the key manually
fetch http://portsnap2.FreeBSD.org/pub.ssl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
On Sat, 30 May 2009, 05:39 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> Thanks for that much, then, Glen. So we still don't know what is wrong.
> I did try it again around midnight CDT, and it still failed the same way.
> In the meantime, my frustration and impatience got the better of me, and
> I touc
On Sat, 30 May 2009 05:32:39 -0400 Glen Barber
wrote:
>On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>>>
>>>Can you paste the 'ANSWER SECTON' from:
>>>
>>> =A0'dig portsnap2.freebsd.org'
>>>
>> =A0 =A0 Sure, but I'm curious to know why. =A0The names all do resolve to=
> A RRs,
>> an
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>>
>>Can you paste the 'ANSWER SECTON' from:
>>
>> 'dig portsnap2.freebsd.org'
>>
> Sure, but I'm curious to know why. The names all do resolve to A RRs,
> and pings to each by name did get echos back. Here it is, although I did
> termi
On Fri, 29 May 2009 22:17:25 -0400 Glen Barber
wrote:
>On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>
>
>[snip]
>
>
>>
>> Script started on Fri May 29 19:33:32 2009
>> hellas# portsnap fetch
>> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
>> Fetching public key from p
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:
[snip]
>
> Script started on Fri May 29 19:33:32 2009
> hellas# portsnap fetch
> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
> Fetching public key from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... failed.
> Fetching public key from portsnap2.Fr
Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
Hi
After a 'portsnap fetch' is it portsnap extract or is it portsnap
update? What is the proper way?
I user FreeBSD 7.1
regards
Nataraj
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:05:16 +0100
Olivier SMEDTS wrote:
> 2009/3/10 Nataraj S Narayan :
> > Hi
> >
> > After a 'portsnap fetch' is it portsnap extract or is it portsnap
> > update? What is the proper way?
>
> Hello,
>
> "portsnap extract" extracts the entire ports tree, "replacing existing
>
2009/3/10 Nataraj S Narayan :
> Hi
>
> After a 'portsnap fetch' is it portsnap extract or is it portsnap
> update? What is the proper way?
Hello,
"portsnap extract" extracts the entire ports tree, "replacing existing
files and directories" (from the manpage). "portsnap update" only
extracts the
2008/3/9, Simon L. Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2008.03.09 15:38:53 +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > On 2008.03.09 14:36:49 +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
> > > Gerard schreef:
> > > > I just saw this 'portsnap' error message for the first time.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Looking up portsnap.Fr
On 2008.03.09 14:36:49 +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
> Gerard schreef:
> > I just saw this 'portsnap' error message for the first time.
> >
> >
> > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found.
> > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... done.
> > Latest snapshot on server is
On 2008.03.09 15:38:53 +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2008.03.09 14:36:49 +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
> > Gerard schreef:
> > > I just saw this 'portsnap' error message for the first time.
> > >
> > >
> > > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found.
> > > Fetching snapshot tag
Gerard schreef:
> I just saw this 'portsnap' error message for the first time.
>
>
> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found.
> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... done.
> Latest snapshot on server is older than what we already have!
> Cowardly refusing to downg
On 2007.10.14 12:11:38 +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2007.10.14 11:27:13 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:28:03AM +0200, Derkjan de Haan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Howyd,
> > >
> > > Can it be that something related to portsnap hangs? I'm not seeing any
> > > updates
On 2007.10.14 11:27:13 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:28:03AM +0200, Derkjan de Haan wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Howyd,
> >
> > Can it be that something related to portsnap hangs? I'm not seeing any
> > updates (i.e. the png security update) come through.
> >
> The server that b
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:28:03AM +0200, Derkjan de Haan wrote:
> Hi,
Howyd,
>
> Can it be that something related to portsnap hangs? I'm not seeing any
> updates (i.e. the png security update) come through.
>
The server that builds the portsnap data is down due to hardware
problems. I'm not su
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 12:34:22PM -0700, Marcus Reid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried this on a couple of different machines a few times over
> the last couple of days, and keep getting the same results. Starting
> with an empty /var/db/portsnap :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/db]# portsnap fetch
>
On 9/20/07, Marcus Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tried this on a couple of different machines a few times over
> the last couple of days, and keep getting the same results. Starting
> with an empty /var/db/portsnap :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/db]# portsnap fetch
> Looking up portsnap
Alexander Sizov wrote:
>>> The number of fetching patches (1980) != number of fetched patches
>>> (143[8-9]). Why it happens?
>
>> Does it happen only on portsnap3, right?
>
> Yes.
I dunno why, but portsnap3 had strange behaviors since the beginning.
Apart from speed (it's the slowest from her
Duane Hill wrote:
Every once in a while I get the following when doing an update of the
ports tree via portsnap:
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... using portsnap3.FreeBSD.org.
Fetching snapshot tag... fetch:
http://portsnap3.FreeBSD.org./latest.ssl: Not Found
Failed.
Every t
If for some reason you have not enough space in /var, you can just create a
symlink or set the path in /etc/portsnap.conf(/usr/local/etc/portsnap.conf
if it's the one from ports).
On 6/10/07, Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
哺 2007-06-10耒��19:03 +0200▏Ivan Voras厚��│
> Hi
>
> Are files in /var/
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
