GST-LV2 plugin is not requested by libreoffice itself but load by gstreamer
engine.
However, LV2 and bunch of plughins was updated recently and it may cause a such
problems.
Try to rebuild all gst-lv2 relelated.
--
Dima. (desktop, kde, x11, office, ports-secteam)@FreeBSD team
(flu...@freebsd.or
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:25 PM Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > Pre-built packages for 11 and 12 amd64 are available at
> > https://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/libreoffice/
7.0.0 is officially released, thanks fluffy again for updating the WIP
repository:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freeb
Hi!
> Pre-built packages for 11 and 12 amd64 are available at
> https://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/libreoffice/
The downloads seems to have problems:
fetch
https://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/libreoffice/12_amd64/libreoffice-7.0.0.2.txz
libreoffice-7.0.0.2.txz 9% of 109 MB
Pre-built packages for 11 and 12 amd64 are available at
https://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/libreoffice/
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 9:42 PM Dima Panov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> 7.0.0.RC2 is landed, release is around the corner.
>
> As always, please welcome to test.
>
> --
> WBR, Dima. (Desktop, KDE, X11,
Hello!
7.0.0.RC2 is landed, release is around the corner.
As always, please welcome to test.
--
WBR, Dima. (Desktop, KDE, X11, Office)@FreeBSD team
(flu...@freebsd.org, https://t.me/dima_panov)
> On Thursday, Jul 16, 2020 at 3:17 PM, Dima Panov (mailto:flu...@freebsd.org)> wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
Hi Dima,
Am 16.07.20 um 07:17 schrieb Dima Panov:
> Hello!
>
> LibreOffice 7.0 branch is over to release candadate and office@FreeBSD team
> calls everyone interested to join us in testing cycle
>
> Our WIP repository available at GitHub,
> https://github.com/lwhsu/freebsd-ports-libreoffice, b
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020, Shawn Webb wrote:
There is nothing inconvenient about enjoying your hard work. You're
awesome and your work (along with any other contributors) is very much
appreciated.
Thank you so much for all you do.
Agreed; don't apologise for doing (hard) volunteer work, and of cour
> On 11. Jun 2020, at 17:10, Dima Panov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> We know, all FreeBSD users waits for new release of LireOffice.
> And now it almost here.
> But before land it to the ports, we want to inform community about some
> important changes to build options.
>
> At first, GTK3 option i
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 01:10:37AM +1000, Dima Panov wrote:
> Discussions, patches, proposals are welcome.
>
> We're sorry for the inconvenience.
Hey Dima,
There is nothing inconvenient about enjoying your hard work. You're
awesome and your work (along with any other contributors) is very much
a
On 2019-08-21 02:12, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote:
> See PR
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239988
>
> Only with option qt5 on.
Which is also implied/forced when enabling KDE5 :-(
imb
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailin
See PR
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239988
Only with option qt5 on.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@fr
I see no failures with libreoffice at the moment. Maybe, it is a false
positive.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 3:20 AM, Walter Schwarzenfeld <
w.schwarzenf...@utanet.at> wrote:
> After the update of CoimMP pkg check shows
>
> libreoffice is missing a required shared library: libCgl.so
> libreoffice is missing a required shared library: libClp.so
> libreoffice is missing a required s
On 24/03/2018 19:07, tech-lists wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Building libreoffice (libreoffice-en_GB) complains about illegal
> instruction and dumps core. Full script output is at
> https://www.zyxst.net/errors/libreofficebuildfail.txt
please ignore, libreoffice builds fine on a pristine installation.
--
On 07/08/2017 09:31, blubee blubeeme wrote:
Hello
I am running into a printing bug with libreoffice :
http://www.freshports.org/editors/libreoffice
When I try to print, the options to select landscape is greyed out. It's
locked in at portrait. Has anyone else experienced this issue?
I can con
Thank you, the workaround worked here as well, though I had to move two
files (libvclplug_gtk3lo.so and libvclplug_gtklo.so).
Greg
On 13/11/2016 20:30, Tommy Scheunemann wrote:
Hi,
an, even if not really nice and recommended, work-around is to move the
problematic file somewhere or rename it
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 09:30:04PM +0100, Tommy Scheunemann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> an, even if not really nice and recommended, work-around is to move the
> problematic file somewhere or rename it.
> That worked here, though my usage might not be the usage of someone else
> so it still might cause some
Hi,
an, even if not really nice and recommended, work-around is to move the
problematic file somewhere or rename it.
That worked here, though my usage might not be the usage of someone else
so it still might cause some pain somewhere.
Le 13.11.2016 13:48, Grzegorz Junka a écrit:
> After upgrading
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:48:37PM +, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
> After upgrading to 5.2.3 LibreOffice no longer starts. Error shown by the
> libre office launcher:
>
>
> The following application experienced an error and needed to close:
>
> libreoffice --calc
>
> /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/pr
On 2015-10-04 17:13, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem with latest libreoffice (us version) on recent
> FreeBSD-STABLE.
>
> On two almost identical setups, one at work and one at home, the former
> have no problem with LO but the latter has.
>
> - I can open documents b
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:19:24 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/5/2014 3:07 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> Libreoffice links with libgcrypt directly. The reason it does so is
>> because the output of "pkgconf --libs libexslt" is this:
>>
>> -lexslt -lxslt -lz -lm -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -L/usr/local/li
On 8/5/2014 3:07 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:32:15 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/5/2014 2:22 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:25:54 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote:
Can office@ chime in on this?
On 8/1/2014 7:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 2014-08-01 08:53, A
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:32:15 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/5/2014 2:22 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:25:54 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> Can office@ chime in on this?
>>>
>>> On 8/1/2014 7:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 2014-08-01 08:53, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
>
On 8/5/2014 2:22 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:25:54 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote:
Can office@ chime in on this?
On 8/1/2014 7:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 2014-08-01 08:53, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On a 10.0/amd64 system:
# cat /usr/ports/UPDATING
...
20140730:
AFFECTS:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:25:54 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote:
> Can office@ chime in on this?
>
> On 8/1/2014 7:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 2014-08-01 08:53, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
>>> On a 10.0/amd64 system:
>>>
# cat /usr/ports/UPDATING
...
20140730:
AFFECTS: users of secu
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:46:58 +1000 sickoft...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Step 1:
>
> $ libreoffice
>
> Don't run it in the background -- otherwise you'll have to kill
> the stuck process manually when you exit LibreOffice vs. the somewhat
> more convenient CTRL+C for a foreground process (*shrug*).
On Thursday 03 July 2014 09:07:11 José García Juanino wrote:
> I forgot to say that my release is:
>
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Tue Jun
> 3 12:52:18 UTC 2014
> r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>
> On 3 July 2014 09:02,
I forgot to say that my release is:
$ uname -a
FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Tue Jun
3 12:52:18 UTC 2014
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
On 3 July 2014 09:02, José García Juanino wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed the last libreoffice
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:58:59PM -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> Em Qua, 2014-06-11 às 23:25 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin escreveu:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:22:41PM -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> > > It stops with
> > >
> > >
> > >3991 [build ECH] CustomTarget/ins
Em Qua, 2014-06-11 às 23:25 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin escreveu:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:22:41PM -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> > It stops with
> >
> >
> >3991 [build ECH] CustomTarget/instsetoo_native/setup/versionrc^M
> >3992 fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:22:41PM -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> It stops with
>
>
>3991 [build ECH] CustomTarget/instsetoo_native/setup/versionrc^M
>3992 fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent
> directories): .git^M
>
>
> If I set PARALELL=1
> it builds... but
Quick starters are a huge part of the reason windows installations
start to feel sluggish after some time. They are a plague, binding
resources before it's even clear that they're needed.
i can accept 100MB of VM "locked" per user for speed.
libreoffice --quickstart --nologo
thank you very mu
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:54:59 +0100 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
> > just the same time it made your system start take longer.
>
> true. but if user close a document and then open another - you get twice
> the waiting time.
>
> >
On 21/02/2013 20:54, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>
>> You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
>> just the same time it made your system start take longer.
>
> true. but if user close a document and then open another - you get twice the
> waiting time.
That's strange. As lon
You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
just the same time it made your system start take longer.
true. but if user close a document and then open another - you get twice
the waiting time.
Quick starters are a huge part of the reason windows installations
start to
On 18/02/2013 12:46, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> package works great (and far faster than openoffice) but still i would find
> quickstarter functionality that is available in windows openoffice useful.
You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
just the same time it made your
[root@wojtek /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/share/psprint]# ls -l driver/
total 28
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 24945 16 sty 10:41 SGENPRT.PS
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1176 16 sty 10:41 SGENT42.PS
i just want "generic postscript" working. nothing else.
You still need a PPD file. I don't see one
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:22:11 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > - cd /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/share/psprint/
> > - mkdir -p driver
> > - cd driver
> > - cp yourppdfiles .
>
> wrong hint
>
> [root@wojtek /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/share/psprint]# ls -l driver/
> total 28
> -rw-r--r--
- cd /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/share/psprint/
- mkdir -p driver
- cd driver
- cp yourppdfiles .
wrong hint
[root@wojtek /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/share/psprint]# ls -l driver/
total 28
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 24945 16 sty 10:41 SGENPRT.PS
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1176 16 sty 10:41 SGEN
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:12:06 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> got:
> "cannot install a printer because filesystem is readonly. please
> contact administrator"
>
> in spite of running as root and with all filesystem read-write
>
>
> what more can i check?
Google. This is a well know proble
Once you start LibreOffice it opens additional documents within the same
process - which is much faster than starting LibreOffice.
my
other question - where are printers defined in libreoffice?
System wide printer:
/usr/local/lib/libreoffice/share/psprint/psprint.conf
/usr/local/lib/libreo
On 2013-Feb-18 12:46:17 +0100, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>I found loading a document taking milliseconds only when other document is
>already loaded, while otherwise it is few seconds.
Once you start LibreOffice it opens additional documents within the same
process - which is much faster than star
nobody can help?
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
package works great (and far faster than openoffice) but still i would find
quickstarter functionality that is available in windows openoffice useful.
I found loading a document taking milliseconds only when other document is
alrea
On 08/02/2013 14:41, Albert Shih wrote:
> ===> Registering installation for libreoffice-3.6.5_1
> pkg_create: read_plist: unknown command '@dirrmtry share/mimelnk/application'
> (package tools out of date?)
> pkg_create: read_plist: unknown command '@dirrmtry share/mimelnk' (package
> tools out
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Albert Shih wrote:
> Le 08/02/2013 ? 12:35:12-0800, Kevin Oberman a écrit
>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
>> >> > complaints already. :-(
>> >>
>> > On one of my pc everything compile, everything work but the registration
>> > don't work, th
Le 08/02/2013 ? 12:35:12-0800, Kevin Oberman a écrit
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
> >> > complaints already. :-(
> >>
> > On one of my pc everything compile, everything work but the registration
> > don't work, the make install finish with :
> >
> >
> > ===> Registering
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
> Le 07/02/2013 ? 11:18:34+0100, Olivier Smedts a écrit
>> 2013/2/6 Jung-uk Kim :
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > On 2013-02-06 11:15:44 -0500, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>> >> 2013/2/6 Denny Lin :
>> gmake[2]: *
Le 07/02/2013 ? 11:18:34+0100, Olivier Smedts a écrit
> 2013/2/6 Jung-uk Kim :
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 2013-02-06 11:15:44 -0500, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> >> 2013/2/6 Denny Lin :
> gmake[2]: ***
> [/tmp/lobuild/workdir/unxfbsd.pro/CustomTarget/test
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:21:59AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Am I correct in believing LibreOffice(-3.6.5) will build with
> OpenJDK-6, but not OpenJDK-7?
>
Yes upstream do not support openjdk7 yet iirc
regards,
Bapt
pgpBuaLr2l9B8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Le 07/02/2013 ? 11:18:34+0100, Olivier Smedts a écrit
> 2013/2/6 Jung-uk Kim :
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 2013-02-06 11:15:44 -0500, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> >> 2013/2/6 Denny Lin :
> gmake[2]: ***
> [/tmp/lobuild/workdir/unxfbsd.pro/CustomTarget/test
2013/2/6 Jung-uk Kim :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2013-02-06 11:15:44 -0500, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>> 2013/2/6 Denny Lin :
gmake[2]: ***
[/tmp/lobuild/workdir/unxfbsd.pro/CustomTarget/testtools/uno_test.done]
> Segmentation fault: 11 (core dump crיי
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-02-06 13:19:12 -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 2013-02-06 11:15:44 -0500, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>> 2013/2/6 Denny Lin :
gmake[2]: ***
[/tmp/lobuild/workdir/unxfbsd.pro/CustomTarget/testtools/uno_test.done]
>
Segme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-02-06 11:15:44 -0500, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2013/2/6 Denny Lin :
>>> gmake[2]: ***
>>> [/tmp/lobuild/workdir/unxfbsd.pro/CustomTarget/testtools/uno_test.done]
>>>
>>>
Segmentation fault: 11 (core dump créé)
>>
>> I am also seeing this on -
2013/2/6 Denny Lin :
>> gmake[2]: ***
>> [/tmp/lobuild/workdir/unxfbsd.pro/CustomTarget/testtools/uno_test.done]
>> Segmentation fault: 11 (core dump créé)
>
> I am also seeing this on -CURRENT amd64. For some reason uno causes a
> segmentation fault. I do not have Java enabled.
"Metoo" : uno segf
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 04:38:07PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote:
> Le 06/02/2013 ? 16:20:18+0100, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit
> =
> (38/40) Building module testtools
> =
> Entering
> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.6.5.2/testtools/prj
>
> gbuild module
>
Le 06/02/2013 ? 16:20:18+0100, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit
> > [ building ZIP ] xhp_swriter_en-US.zip
> > [ building ZIP ] sbasic_en-US.zip
> > Entering
> > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.6.5.2/helpcontent2/util/simpress
> >
> > [ building ZIP ] xhp_simpress_en-US.zip
> >
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote:
> Le 05/02/2013 ? 17:11:57+0100, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:09:44PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Not very important for me but just informe you the libreoffice 3.6.5 ports
> > > didn
Le 05/02/2013 ? 17:11:57+0100, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:09:44PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Not very important for me but just informe you the libreoffice 3.6.5 ports
> > didn't build on
> >
> > FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #1 r246113
> >
> > with
>
Hi!
> > [ build LNK ] Library/libofficebean.so
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljawt
>
> Same here:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=175856
Pointer to
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-office/2013-February/001706.html
from jkim@ says:
cd /var/db/pkg
pkg_delete libcmis-0.
Hi!
> [ build LNK ] Library/libofficebean.so
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljawt
Same here:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=175856
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 7 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:09:44PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Not very important for me but just informe you the libreoffice 3.6.5 ports
> didn't build on
>
>FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #1 r246113
>
> with
>
> [ build MOD ] basebmp
> [ build MOD ] basegfx
> [ build JAR ] unoil
> [
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, the wise Bob Eager wrote:
>
>> I solved it for the moment by temporarily putting WITH_GCC=yes in
>> make.conf, then cleaning and trying again.
>
>
> Yes, this was it. Thanks for the tip!
>
> Regards,
> Marco
Worked for
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, the wise Bob Eager wrote:
I solved it for the moment by temporarily putting WITH_GCC=yes in
make.conf, then cleaning and trying again.
Yes, this was it. Thanks for the tip!
Regards,
Marco
--
Being owned by someone used to be called
slavery -- now it's called commitment.
_
On 03/02/2013 05:08, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I am unable to build libreoffice on an i386 system. It builds fine on
> amd64. All systems are running 9.1-stable, one from Jan. 10 and one
> from Jan. 27. Both using default compilers. I get a segment fault
> running the sot.
This may not be a solution
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 20:08:26 -0800
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I am unable to build libreoffice on an i386 system. It builds fine on
> amd64. All systems are running 9.1-stable, one from Jan. 10 and one
> from Jan. 27. Both using default compilers. I get a segment fault
> running the sot.
> [ build CUT
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, the wise Kevin Oberman wrote:
I am unable to build libreoffice on an i386 system. It builds fine on
amd64. All systems are running 9.1-stable, one from Jan. 10 and one
from Jan. 27. Both using default compilers. I get a segment fault
running the sot.
[ build CUT ] sot_test_so
On 12/20/12 07:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:30:37PM +0100, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've some trouble to compile libreoffice 3.5.7_1 after icu update to 50.1
>> version
>>
>> the problem is located in i18npool module and the error is during the
>> link p
On 12/20/12 06:30, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
Hi,
I've some trouble to compile libreoffice 3.5.7_1 after icu update to 50.1
version
portmaster -w -r devel/icu
--
Yours in Christ,
Joseph A Nagy Jr
"Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction
is stupid." -- Proverbs 1
Thanks Bapt!
Best regards,
Luca
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 02:20:22PM +0100, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
> > Hi,
> > thanks for the fast answer!!!
> >
> > @Joseph,
> > Yes, I read the UPDATING file, but I guess the -w option is not a
> solut
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 02:20:22PM +0100, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for the fast answer!!!
>
> @Joseph,
> Yes, I read the UPDATING file, but I guess the -w option is not a solution
> in this case.
> the -w option is a temporary fix to store the old library for compatibility
> reasons
Hi,
thanks for the fast answer!!!
@Joseph,
Yes, I read the UPDATING file, but I guess the -w option is not a solution
in this case.
the -w option is a temporary fix to store the old library for compatibility
reasons with "not yet recompiled" packages.
AFAIK, the goal of bumping libreoffice PORTREV
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:30:37PM +0100, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've some trouble to compile libreoffice 3.5.7_1 after icu update to 50.1
> version
>
> the problem is located in i18npool module and the error is during the link
> phase:
>
> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoff
2012-08-28 23:11, Kevin Oberman skrev:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Because of the problem above when trying to start Libreoffice. I want to
follow the advise in this link:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=27035
and install Libreoffice-legacy.
The probl
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
>
> Because of the problem above when trying to start Libreoffice. I want to
> follow the advise in this link:
>
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=27035
>
> and install Libreoffice-legacy.
>
> The problem is that I can't find such
Because of the problem above when trying to start Libreoffice. I want to
follow the advise in this link:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=27035
and install Libreoffice-legacy.
The problem is that I can't find such a port.
Where should I look?
Thanks
/Leslie
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Yes, you are right.
The update is finish.
Thanks for your help.
Best regards
Suri
Am 22.07.2012 14:18, schrieb Robert Backhaus:
> On 22 July 2012 20:13, Joerg Surmann wrote:
>>
> /usr/bin/unzip -uo test.zip
> unzip: -n, -o and -u are contradictory
On 22 July 2012 20:13, Joerg Surmann wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> /usr/bin/unzip -uo test.zip
> unzip: -n, -o and -u are contradictory
>
> /usr/local/bin/unzip -uo test.zip
> Archive: test.zip
>
> i will create a symlink to /usr/bin/zip
> and run a test in libr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
/usr/bin/unzip -uo test.zip
unzip: -n, -o and -u are contradictory
/usr/local/bin/unzip -uo test.zip
Archive: test.zip
i will create a symlink to /usr/bin/zip
and run a test in libreoffice.
Am 22.07.2012 11:20, schrieb Robert Backhaus:
> On 22 J
On 22 July 2012 18:21, Joerg Surmann wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> think the unzip path is ok.
> i have reinstall unzip.
> now will update libreoffice.
>
> # whereis unzip
> unzip: /usr/bin/unzip /usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-15/man1/unzip.1.gz
> /usr/src/usr.bin/un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
think the unzip path is ok.
i have reinstall unzip.
now will update libreoffice.
# whereis unzip
unzip: /usr/bin/unzip /usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-15/man1/unzip.1.gz
/usr/src/usr.bin/unzip
# locate \*/unzip
/media/disk/usr/bin/unzip
/usr/bin/unzip
/
On 22 July 2012 06:39, Joerg Surmann wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> #build
> mkdir -p ../../unxfbsd.pro/misc/java_src/
> cp
> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/solver/unxfbsd.pro/bin/jurt_src.zip
> ../../unxfbsd.pro/misc/java_src/jurt_sr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
#build
mkdir -p ../../unxfbsd.pro/misc/java_src/
cp
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/solver/unxfbsd.pro/bin/jurt_src.zip
../../unxfbsd.pro/misc/java_src/jurt_src.zip
cd ../../unxfbsd.pro/misc/java_src && unzip -quo
Yes i have.
Same error.
--
mobile
Robert Huff schrieb:
Oliver Heesakkers writes:
> Please keep in mind that Qt3, KDE3 and all their accompanying
> ports (which AFAICT includes arts) are dying a slow and agonizing
> death as was announced a little over a year ago:
> http://mail.kde.org/piper
On 21 July 2012 21:46, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Oliver Heesakkers writes:
>
>> Please keep in mind that Qt3, KDE3 and all their accompanying
>> ports (which AFAICT includes arts) are dying a slow and agonizing
>> death as was announced a little over a year ago:
>> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/k
Oliver Heesakkers writes:
> Please keep in mind that Qt3, KDE3 and all their accompanying
> ports (which AFAICT includes arts) are dying a slow and agonizing
> death as was announced a little over a year ago:
> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/2011-July/011076.html
The key w
Joerg Surmann writes:
> I have delete all qt3.
>
> now i have a new error:
>
>internal build errors:
>
> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/odk/pack/gendocu
>
> it seems that the error is inside 'odk', please r
Robert Backhaus writes:
> In my case, the arts upgrade had installed qt3 (!), an
> libreoffice was linking against it. I 'pkg_delete -f'd it, and
> the build seems to be running fine now, although time will
> tell. I will have to find out why, as it has happened before. So
> check whether qt
Op za 21 jul 2012 18:24:10 schreef Robert Backhaus:
> On 21 July 2012 17:40, Robert Backhaus wrote:
> > In my case, the arts upgrade had installed qt3 (!), an libreoffice was
> > linking against it. I 'pkg_delete -f'd it, and the build seems to be
> > running fine now, although time will tell.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks for replay.
I have delete all qt3.
now i have a new error:
internal build errors:
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/odk/pack/gendocu
it seems that the error is inside
On 21 July 2012 17:40, Robert Backhaus wrote:
> In my case, the arts upgrade had installed qt3 (!), an libreoffice was
> linking against it. I 'pkg_delete -f'd it, and the build seems to be
> running fine now, although time will tell.
That's a success for me. Without qt33 it builds and installs c
In my case, the arts upgrade had installed qt3 (!), an libreoffice was
linking against it. I 'pkg_delete -f'd it, and the build seems to be
running fine now, although time will tell. I will have to find out
why, as it has happened before. So check whether qt3 is on your
system, and, if so, nuke it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
when i build libreoffice without the kde option:
internal build errors:
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/odk/pack/gendocu
Am 21.07.2012 08:05, schrieb Joerg Surmann:
> Yes i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Yes i use the KDE option.
9.0p3 amd64.
..
12 errors generated.
gmake[2]: ***
[/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/workdir/unxfbsd.pro/CxxObject/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEData.o]
Fehler 1
dmake: Error code 2, w
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Joerg Surmann wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> update libreoffice faild.
> internal build errors.
>
> ERROR: error 65280 ocurred while making
> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/vlc/prj
>
> it seems t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
update libreoffice faild.
internal build errors.
ERROR: error 65280 ocurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.5.3/vlc/prj
it seems that the error is inside 'vlc' , please re-run buld
inside this module to is
2012/7/19 Robert Huff :
> There is at least one person out there who has successfully
> built LibreOffice 3.5.5 using (system) clang 3.2?
Yes, using stock 9-STABLE (but a recent one as the clang patch has
been MFC'ed) and the latest libreoffice port WITH_SYSTEM_CLANG.
Thanks for the work
On 07/19/2012 12:47, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 15:32:56 -0400, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 07/19/2012 12:17, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> On 2012-07-19 21:06, Robert Huff wrote: ...
Let me be clear: There is at least one person out there who has
successfully built LibreOffice 3.5.5 usi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-19 15:32:56 -0400, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/19/2012 12:17, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2012-07-19 21:06, Robert Huff wrote: ...
>>> Let me be clear: There is at least one person out there who has
>>> successfully built LibreOffice 3.5.5 us
On 07/19/2012 12:17, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 21:06, Robert Huff wrote:
> ...
>> Let me be clear:
>> There is at least one person out there who has successfully
>> built LibreOffice 3.5.5 using (system) clang 3.2?
>
> The version of clang in base is 3.1. I have successfully
On 2012-07-19 21:06, Robert Huff wrote:
...
> Let me be clear:
> There is at least one person out there who has successfully
> built LibreOffice 3.5.5 using (system) clang 3.2?
The version of clang in base is 3.1. I have successfully compiled
LibreOffice with it, and it even seemed to
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
