-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-19 15:32:56 -0400, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/19/2012 12:17, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 2012-07-19 21:06, Robert Huff wrote: ... >>> Let me be clear: There is at least one person out there who has >>> successfully built LibreOffice 3.5.5 using (system) clang 3.2? >> >> The version of clang in base is 3.1. I have successfully >> compiled LibreOffice with it, and it even seemed to run OK, >> though I didn't test it very thoroughly. There were several >> other posters which confirmed the same. > > ... including me. > >> Apparently in r301038, jkim updated the libreoffice port to use >> the lang/clang-devel port instead, which is built from a very >> recent 3.2 snapshot. I have no idea if LO compiles successfully >> with that. Maybe you found a problem with the clang-devel port. >> :) > > I'm currently building on 8-stable with clang-devel, so we'll see > how that goes.
Please don't bother. I *know* it is broken there. > ... and while we're on that topic, IMO it would have been a *lot* > better for jkim to have coordinated with brooks to get lang/clang > updated to the same level as clang in HEAD (i.e., including the fix > for the bug that affects LO) prior to releasing the update for > 3.5.5. As it stands right now, this is the sequence for a user on > 8-stable: > > 1. install lang/clang (+ llvm, in all clang steps below) 2. > build/install LO 3.5.2 3. uninstall lang/clang 4. install > lang/clang-devel 5. build/install LO 3.5.5 ... then assuming > lang/clang is fixed down the road ... 6. uninstall > lang/clang-devel 7. install lang/clang 8. build/install LO 3.5.N > > This is exactly the kind of thing that makes people look at the way > the ports tree is managed and shake their head in disbelief. > > Even if lang/clang needed to be upgraded at every new LO release > (as it would have this time) tools like portmaster can handle that > upgrade "in line" without any intervention from the user. The > procedure above requires at least 2 manual steps that cannot be > automated. I admit that it was my mistake and assumed clang-devel would be good enough for LibreOffice on 7 & 8. Sorry for that. Working on fixing it. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlAIZG0ACgkQmlay1b9qnVOzSQCcDvPkR6W5ODT0zKdSr+QwJd20 IVgAoM5vSR//zN3LIWC0+RsHdkdGF1QI =AogE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
