Paolo Bormida writes:
> 2010/9/30 Anonymous
>> In such cases there are usually two ports, e.g.
>>
>> net-p2p/amule (latest release)
>> net-p2p/amule-devel (svn snapshot)
>>
>> Now, if you're willing to maintain non-devel port I can write you a diff
>> and request my pending repocopy in ports/1
2010/9/30 Anonymous
> Paolo Bormida writes:
>
> > I understand maintaing a port is an huge gift to the FreeBSD
> > community, and gratitude goes to those, such as you, that do this
> > job.
>
> Keep the thanks for previous maintainers. It seems like I've contributed
> only confusion.
>
Have you
Paolo Bormida writes:
> I understand maintaing a port is an huge gift to the FreeBSD
> community, and gratitude goes to those, such as you, that do this
> job.
Keep the thanks for previous maintainers. It seems like I've contributed
only confusion.
> I have built and installed the port on SPARC
Hi,
I am here again with a consideration about the choiche to use a snapshot for
the amule port.
I understand maintaing a port is an huge gift to the FreeBSD community, and
gratitude goes to those, such as you, that do this job.
It is not my goal to ask you to steer the port in the direction tha
No, never looked at wxgtk28 port and I understand it would be non trivial to
split it. Building it as part of amule would be better.
But I am not here to ask you to do that, just suggesting what might be
useful to people wishing to use amule on servers. On the other hand it is
true that compiling
Paolo Bormida writes:
> My goal is not to build the gui version, just amuled and amulecmd,
> and I think this can be done in amule calling configure like
> described in this howto http://wiki.amule.org/index.php/
> HowTo_Compile_aMuled
Have you looked at x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 port? You'd need to
Of course this would be useful to those who do wish not to install/start X
on a server, whether it be a i386/amd64 or a sparc64 or other architectures
that does not have a graphic card on the server (an headless machine) .
In this case would be useless to do a very long build of X11 and amule gui,
Double answer:
The functions you see in amulecmd should be in wxbase and wx is not a
problem.
My goal is not to build the gui version, just amuled and amulecmd, and I
think this can be done in amule calling configure like described in this
howto http://wiki.amule.org/index.php/HowTo_Compile_aMule
Anonymous writes:
> Paolo Bormida writes:
>
>> Can the new knobs be used to do a gui-less build of amule?
>
> No, even without --disable-monolithic amule would still require WX.
^^^
Typo: without -> with.
Perhaps, I misinterpreted your question and you just don't want to build
`a
Paolo Bormida writes:
> Can the new knobs be used to do a gui-less build of amule?
No, even without --disable-monolithic amule would still require WX.
$ readelf -d $(which amulecmd) | fgrep wx
0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library:
[libwx_baseu_net-2.8.so.0]
0x
Nice to know that amule will get more frequent updates, and the new knobs
are great as well, but isn't risky to use snapshots for a port? Are there
any policies about what to base a port upon?
And yes, you are correct about the availability of the sparc64 packages.
Can the new knobs be used to do
Anonymous writes:
> Besides, I plan to rename the port to plain `amule' with the next update
> in order to remove last bit of confusion, i.e. `2' version suffix in
> port directory name and in LATEST_LINK.
Pass me pointyhat for not doing it when the port switched to use snapshots.
__
Paolo Bormida writes:
> Does amule2 port switched from a stable 2.2.5 release to a daily
> snapshot?
Yes, snapshots are gonna be used unless there are more frequent releases
upstream. You can find the history of changes on freshports.
http://www.freshports.org/net-p2p/amule2
The package name
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:42:37 +0200, Paolo Bormida wrote
> To: ganael.laplan...@martymac.org
Hi Paolo,
(this is a re-post of my previous, private answer)
I am sorry but I am no more the maintainer of aMule. You should get in touch
with swel...@gmail.com, who is the new maintainer.
> Sorry to bo
Sorry, but I think I should forward this to you as well.
Paolo Bormida
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paolo Bormida
Date: 2010/9/22
Subject: Question about amule port version
To: ganael.laplan...@martymac.org
Sorry to bother you, but I think I understood the problem I described
15 matches
Mail list logo
