Paolo Bormida <pborm...@gmail.com> writes: > Does amule2 port switched from a stable 2.2.5 release to a daily > snapshot?
Yes, snapshots are gonna be used unless there are more frequent releases upstream. You can find the history of changes on freshports. http://www.freshports.org/net-p2p/amule2 The package name also switched from `aMule' to `amule' in order to remove silly vendor capitalization and match port *directory* name. Besides, I plan to rename the port to plain `amule' with the next update in order to remove last bit of confusion, i.e. `2' version suffix in port directory name and in LATEST_LINK. > Does the sparc64 port still has the daily snapshot instead of the more > up-to-date 2.2.6_4 available? aMule-10266.tbz and amule-10275.tbz are newer than aMule-2.2.6_4.tbz unless I'm missing smth. $ pkg_version aMule < $ portmaster -L ===>>> aMule-2.2.6_4 ===>>> New version available: amule-10275 I can only find aMule-10266.tbz for sparc64 for 8-stable, though. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
