Of course this would be useful to those who do wish not to install/start X on a server, whether it be a i386/amd64 or a sparc64 or other architectures that does not have a graphic card on the server (an headless machine) .
In this case would be useless to do a very long build of X11 and amule gui, along with amuled+amulecmd, then never use the X part. Paolo 2010/9/22 Paolo Bormida <pborm...@gmail.com> > Double answer: > > The functions you see in amulecmd should be in wxbase and wx is not a > problem. > > My goal is not to build the gui version, just amuled and amulecmd, and I > think this can be done in amule calling configure like described in this > howto http://wiki.amule.org/index.php/HowTo_Compile_aMuled > > So, I think a knob for passing to configure those flags would do the job. > > This way X11 should not be needed. > > Paolo > > 2010/9/22 Anonymous <swel...@gmail.com> > > Anonymous <swel...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Paolo Bormida <pborm...@gmail.com> writes: >> > >> >> Can the new knobs be used to do a gui-less build of amule? >> > >> > No, even without --disable-monolithic amule would still require WX. >> ^^^ >> Typo: without -> with. >> >> Perhaps, I misinterpreted your question and you just don't want to build >> `amule' while still having WX dependency. It's easy to provide a knob >> for monolithic. Do you need it? >> > > > > -- > ----------------------- > Paolo Bormida > Giaveno - Torino > ----------------------- > Italy > ----------------------- > -- ----------------------- Paolo Bormida Giaveno - Torino ----------------------- Italy ----------------------- _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
