d pdflatex and the
pdfpages package to cat, rotate, N-up and what-not several PDF
documents.
Cheers,
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool,
than to speak, and remove all doubt.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailin
I've submitted PR ports/123112 as a possible next step to solve the
problem.
On Mon, 28.04.2008 at 23:09:31 +0400, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:19:17 +0200
> Ulrich Spoerlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> > Heh, well, that's exactly what I
On Sat, 26.04.2008 at 00:18:25 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 09:59:33PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> > I'm trying to update rubygem-rgl and the rdoc part is giving me a
> > headache, as the rdoc will obviously use readdir() only to walk th
t's a big problem since the rdoc is also run on do-install and
I'm not sure I could generate the pkg-plist dynamically *after* that
step.
How are other people solving this problem?
Cheers,
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool,
than to speak, and r
d add the following dependancy, to have the port rebuild after
every commit (to Makefile, or some suitable file of the port)
foo.tbz: category/foo/Makefile
Though this will trigger quite a hefty rebuild, if you ever touch the
Makefile of the gettext port for example.
Cheers,
Ulrich Spoerlein
-
lit the TeXLive Distribution up into say 12 ports? Something
minimal that can be used by other ports to typeset documentation (how
common is this, anyway?) and 3-4 big TeXLive ports for the typical TeX
user.
Cheers,
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
It is better to remain silent and be th
explicitely in slapd.conf?
No. It is purely optional. You would need certificates before it can
even possibly start working anyways.
> nss_ldap-1.257 <<===
> openldap-client-2.3.38
> openldap-server-2.3.38
> pam_ldap-1.8.2
My other computer is running with nss_ldap-1.257
-sasl-client-2.3.38
openldap-server-2.3.38
pam_ldap-1.8.2
Cheers,
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool,
than to speak, and remove all doubt.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
l
to build because of the missing definition, I guess. bsd-airtools has
recently been flagged as broken, too. Presumably due to the same reason.
How should these ports deal with this? Both are calling SIOCGWAVELAN
with wi_type set to WI_RID_COMMS_QUALITY.
Cheers,
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
It is better
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> >The question is: Has it been fixed in all Branches that are currently
> >supported by the Ports tree? What about 5.x?
>
> Anyway, if you are running 5.x, why not try it out? Try makefile like:
>
> a=abc
uestion is: Has it been fixed in all Branches that are currently
supported by the Ports tree? What about 5.x?
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
"The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is
spelled before you can look it up to see how it is spe
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting "Ulrich Spoerlein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 18:28:55
> +0200):
> > > The problem not discussed so far is: some ports may not have all first
> > > order dependencies. So anyone wanting to change this sh
On 5/16/07, Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting "J. Porter Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 16 May 2007
06:25:32 -0500):
> What I don't like about the flattening of the dependencies is
> that there seems to be information loss; that is, I can't figure
> out why one port (e
On 5/16/07, Matthew D. Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:13:41AM +0200 I heard the voice of
Ulrich Spoerlein, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> True, true. And as pointed out above, if you don't build the INDEX
> with your current pkg options, it is useles
On 5/15/07, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> I also need to quickly look up origin -> pkgname and would suggest
> placing this in the INDEX file. Then you have the foundation in place to
> be able to run 'make vim-7.1.2.tbz&#x
run 'make vim-7.1.2.tbz' in, say, /usr/ports/ and it will
first create gettext-x.y.tbz and stuff. Ie, it could resolve/build
dependencies *before* even starting the build in editors/vim.
This then quickly leads to parallel pkg builds working (think: make -j3
vim-7.x.y.tbz)
Ulric
em at hand.
Sorry for hijacking this thread.
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
"The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is
spelled before you can look it up to see how it is spelled."
-- Will Cuppy
___
freebsd-port
dependencies in pkg_create. My fix now cuts this out
> completely. Thus there
> is no need to change the structure of /var/db/pkg to use databases or
> anything like this.
I haven't had time to look at your patches, but are your removing second
order dependancies? This woul
lding OOo with my parallel package build script, and as
you can see from the attached patch, the dependency information is
rather excessive. (I'm working on minimizing the graph, though)
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
"The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is
spelled before
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> I wrote a script
That got stripped by the mailling lists ... second try. You can also
fetch it from
http://coyote.dnsalias.net/create_pkg_makefile.sh
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
"The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is
spelled before you
Any flags in your make.conf? What's the actual error message?
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
"The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is
spelled before you can look it up to see how it is spelled."
-- Will Cuppy
___
[EMAIL PROTE
installed packages has to be done by some other
means (pkg_update anyone?).
Q: What about clustering?
A: Easily possible, but would suck when using make(1) for the job.
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
"The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is
spelled before you can look it u
h are the only external tools).
I'm having some problems with unionfs though, and need to implement two
different strategies first, before releasing an early version to the
public.
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
"The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the wo
onv.3.html
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel - 2384 Apr 9 09:47
foo/share/doc/libiconv/iconv_close.3.html
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel -16401 Apr 9 09:47
foo/share/doc/libiconv/iconv_open.3.html
The way I see it, bsdtar(1) extracts the symlink libcharset.so, and then
tries to stat(2) inste
btool15).
NB: Extracting both files with bsdtar(1) works just fine, it's something
that pkg_add does, that breaks it.
> Can you email me the troublesome package file?
Will do in a separate mail.
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
"The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word
efers to
ls(1). If it is the inode link count, how can most of the entries be
zero?
Another strange thing is the pax format. Older packages built outside
the chroot have the following format:
Archive Format: POSIX ustar format, Compression: bzip2
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
"The trouble with the dict
#x27;link
against libsasl'
I think it was openldap vs postfix, where I found out about this. It
makes it unnecessary hard to use one common var in /etc/make.conf for
SASL2 support.
Thanks,
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
"The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know
packages, more reports would come in and we
could fix this better. Until such time, you can probably share the ports
tree between multiple machines via NFS and run 'make install' on each
computer.
On the other hand, it is rather seldom, that you find such differences
between 'make i
ools
- Checkout the port, modify, add files with 'cvs add', delete them with
'cvs rm'
- run 'port submit'
It runs portlint, fills out the PR, CCs the maintainer, hints at
added/removed files, etc. Highly recommended!
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
"The trouble with the
on lynx (the binary!) then a dependancy on lynx (the port) will
be recorded, not on lynx-ssl.
It is trivial to fix, iff you assume that the user only installs
software via ports and all the databases are consistent.
Ulrich Spoerlein
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd
tput/difference of pkg_add/make
install then needs to be analyzed (similar to 'nothing' vs 'make
install deinstall', which is already checked on pointyhat).
I have no idea how to accomplish 1), and have some ideas about 2), but
implementing those is hindered by non-working union
the port itself.
(You can use VAR+=foo then, this needs to be judged on a case by case
basis, though)
hth,
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
> >A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
___
nux-firefox and there is
no sound and it is segfaulting _a lot_. I reverted back to version 7.
Version 9 seems unusable right now.
NB: This is on RELENG_6, perhaps the enhanced Linuxulator lets version 9
work stable on -CURRENT?
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
> >A: Because
ld make those parallel package
builds work without too much fuss.
Package upgrade a something different though, but the whole ports
framework is flawed in that area anyway ('make package' should come
*before* 'make install').
Don't hold your breath though, ENOTIME as always
dstats.org project.
Bye,
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
> >A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
e (to
NO), just like almost every other port does, eg., run
$ egrep '_enable:?-"?NO' /usr/local/etc/rc.d/*
010.pgsql.sh:postgresql_enable=${postgresql_enable:-"NO"}
privoxy:privoxy_enable=${privoxy_enable-"NO"}
snmpd:snmp
t;desktop" users will still be running 5.x
or 6.x
What am I missing?
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD Encrypted mail welcome!
Fingerprint: AEC9 AF5E 01AC 4EE1 8F70 6CBD E76E 2227 20FE E9DD
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
Don't know. Don't
Anish Mistry wrote:
> Would you post the port somewhere? Once Csaba gets the next update
> out he might have time to take a look.
Sigh,
I attached it as shar, looks like even those get stripped now? I'll try
again by attaching it as text ...
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
PGP Key I
total += br;
(gdb) p br
Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0x93
I'm not sure, what to make of that unhandled expression in gdb, so I'm
lost here. Someone in the know might wanna take this further.
Ulrich Spoerlein
PS: Why is fcntl(fd, F_GETLK/F_SETLK, &a
ks for devices which are present when the system
boots up. It is fine for parallel port. Solution b) works for devices
that come and go, too. It is required for ulpt devices.
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD Encrypted mail welcome!
Fingerprint: AEC9
40 matches
Mail list logo
