14.01.2017, 12:18, "René Ladan" :
> Op 14 jan. 2017 01:07 schreef "Mark Martinec" > :
>
> When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a command
> line in a terminal window) I'm noticing occasional streams of diagnostic:
>
> ELF binary type "3" not known.
>
> which seem to be
23.11.2016, 19:42, "Hans Petter Selasky" :
> On 11/23/16 17:27, Ed Schouten wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> 2016-11-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Hans Petter Selasky :
>>> I've made a patch to hopefully optimise SAT solving in our pkg utility.
>>
>> Nice! Do you by any chance have any numbers that show the per
CC'ing premake developers.
24.06.2014, 18:09, "Vitaly Magerya" :
> TL;DR: could a brave ports comitter apply an update for
> devel/premake4 at [1]? That would be much appreciated.
>
> Redports logs for this update are at [2].
>
> Note that redports for some reason doesn't invoke regression-tes
19.06.2014, 12:26, "Anton Shterenlikht" :
> I had to switch to sparc64 for my X clients.
> www/firefox is blocked by multimedia/libvpx.
>
> Can anybody recommend a working web browser with
> javascript?
>
It should be possible to build Firefox without libvpx which is needed
only to decode WebM H
22.09.2013, 19:48, "Eitan Adler" :
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Konstantin Tokarev
> wrote:
>
>> 21.09.2013, 18:26, "Nathan Whitehorn" :
>>> On 09/21/13 09:09, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>>> On 9/21/2013 9:00 AM, Nathan Whiteho
21.09.2013, 18:26, "Nathan Whitehorn" :
> On 09/21/13 09:09, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>> On 9/21/2013 9:00 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>>> On 09/21/13 05:47, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on
13.09.2013, 19:04, "Pietro Cerutti" :
> On 2013-Sep-13, 15:17, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> USES= compiler:c++11
>>
>> Means you need a c++1 capable compiler but not necessary a c++ 11 aware
>> standard
>> library, in that case if the base compiler is not able to support c++11
>> clang33
>
09.08.2012, 15:50, "HU Dong" :
> Hi,all!
> I just installed devel/qtcreator from port. Everything seemed to
> work fine except the debugger. At first I set it to /usr/bin/gdb, it
> simply crashed when I started debugging, with a dialog reporting "The
> gdb process crashed." Then I installed d
13.04.2012, 23:55, "Chris Inacio" :
> On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Chris Inacio wrote:
>>> I was recently asked to do some FreeBSD ports support work. I mostly use a
>>> Mac and the MacPorts system. MacPorts has the concept of a va
09.10.2011, 22:30, "Jakub Lach":
> Speaking of lightness, XFCE is memory hungry
> these days and Linux centric, and Fluxbox is
> not that light after all.
Are you saying that Fluxbox is heavier than KDE3??
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
freebsd-ports@fr
01.07.2011, 11:49, "O. Hartmann" :
> On 07/01/11 09:35, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>> 01.07.2011, 11:06, "O. Hartmann"
>>> And, for those actively developing, is there a good alternative to
>>> Anjuta (no KDevelop, since I do not
01.07.2011, 11:06, "O. Hartmann"
> And, for those actively developing, is there a good alternative to
> Anjuta (no KDevelop, since I do not like KDE and do not have KDE). Thanks,
> Oliver
Depending on what you need you can try:
Geany
Vim
Eclipse
Qt Creator
Actually, KDevelop does not require y
07.04.2011, 23:15, "David Demelier" :
> On 07/04/2011 19:29, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>> 07.04.2011, 20:59, "Attos";:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> What is the best way to uninstall X and all the applications that run under
>>
07.04.2011, 20:59, "Attos" :
> Hello all,
>
> What is the best way to uninstall X and all the applications that run under
> X?
>
> Thanks in advance.
rm -rf /*
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
17.03.2011, 20:33, "Matthias Andree" :
> Not necessarily. If it's a documented extension that you'd allowed (and
> even by sticking to the implicit gnu89 language default of GCC) then
> you'll hardly hear back anything else than "invalid, works as documented".
Note that Clang supports c89 and g
17.03.2011, 15:39, "Konstantin Tokarev" :
> 16.03.2011, 11:33, "Alberto Villa" ;:
>
>> On Wednesday 16 March 2011 09:15:07 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>>> From http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html
>>>
>>> "I
16.03.2011, 11:33, "Alberto Villa" :
> On Wednesday 16 March 2011 09:15:07 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>> From http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html
>>
>> "In addition to the language extensions listed here, Clang aims to
>
>
07.03.2011, 00:54, "Heino Tiedemann" :
> Konstantin Tokarev ; wrote:
>
>> 03.03.2011, 03:27, "Charlie Kester" ;:
>>> On Wed 02 Mar 2011 at 15:06:52 PST Charlie Kester wrote:
>>>> I don't want or need all of the programs in the libr
16.03.2011, 13:33, "Ade Lovett" :
> On Mar 16, 2011, at 04:39 , Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
>> What will happen to ports in non-clang arches (sparc64, ia64) after 9.0R?
>
> With any luck, they will die a silent death and be pointed in the direction
> of NetBSD that likes to look after irrelevan
16.03.2011, 02:27, "Alberto Villa" :
> On Tuesday 15 March 2011 19:20:40 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>> 3. Fix Clang to compile more ports
>
> lots of problems are due to gcc-isms in software, so it's not always possible
>From http://clang.llvm.org/docs/Lang
15.03.2011, 21:32, "Charlie Kester" :
> On Tue 15 Mar 2011 at 11:20:40 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>> 3. Fix Clang to compile more ports
>
> That would be my vote too, but we should probably focus on solutions the
> ports team can control.
You can post bug re
13.03.2011, 01:00, "Doug Barton" :
> Howdy,
>
> As many of you are no doubt already aware, much work has been undertaken
> to make clang the default compiler for the src tree starting with
> 9.0-RELEASE. It is not 100% certain that this change will be made, but
> it's looking more likely every da
04.03.2011, 10:44, "Anoop K" :
> Hello,
> I am a MS windows user and have come here from PC-BSD. I would like to
> make a port request for Radiance < http://radsite.lbl.gov/radiance/ >.
>
> N.B:
> I have only begun experimenting with FreeBSD and have 8.2 installed on
> a stand alone multi boot ma
03.03.2011, 03:27, "Charlie Kester" :
> On Wed 02 Mar 2011 at 15:06:52 PST Charlie Kester wrote:
>
>> I don't want or need all of the programs in the libreoffice suite.
>>
>> In fact, the only reason I might install it is to get the presentation
>> program so I can work with PowerPoint files I oc
02.03.2011, 08:56, "Matthias Apitz" :
> Hello,
>
> Compiling the above mentioned port fails with:
>
> # make
> ===> Building for qca-tls-1.0_7
> c++ -c -pipe -Wall -W -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -DQCA_PLUGIN
> -DOSSL_097 -DOSSL_098 -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DQT_PLUGIN
> -DQT_S
07.02.2011, 20:34, "Ruslan Mahmatkhanov" :
> Hello.
>
> I'm working on port that doesn't builds with "-O2 -pipe", that passed to
> Makefile by default (it exits with message about virtual memory is
> exhausted). I can avoid this by setting CFLAGS="" and CXXFLAGS="" in
> CONFIGURE_ENV. But portlin
> I realise that fortran numerical libraries will
> not interest many, so perhaps this is irrelevant anyway..
>
I guess ones who are interested will prefer to have a choice of BLAS
implementation depending on target hardware, parallelization scales,
peculiarities of problem, personal preference
02.02.2011, 13:28, "Anton Shterenlikht" :
> I've put a port of Slatec together:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/151970
>
> Recently I realised that some 110 routines in Slatec
> are already present in math/blas, and the Blas versions
> seem to be newer.
>
> % ar -t /usr/local/l
> Chromium requires sse2 normally, as detailed in this bug report:
>
> http://crbug.com/9007
This bug report is related to Chromium 2, but I've run Chromium 4 on PIII
on Linux without problems
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mail
23.10.2010, 18:38, "Tomek CEDRO" :
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Konstantin Tokarev
> wrote:
>
>>> Maybe someone has similar feeling, so I thought maybe
>>> its not that bad idea to create GIMP 2.4 port that keep all of the
>>> nice featu
> Maybe someone has similar feeling, so I thought maybe
> its not that bad idea to create GIMP 2.4 port that keep all of the
> nice features destroyed by a new design team in GIMP 2.6?
Haven't you tried to take in contact with GIMP developers?
--
Regards,
Konstantin
22.09.2010, 14:11, "Adam Vande More" :
> BSD license
> has a particular advantage in embedded/black box systems, so not polluting
> base with more viral licensing is pretty important to project as whole I
> think.
Do embedded systems really need to use ports tree? I guess no, or only during
init
> This dvcs is BSD licensed:
IMHO, if it's worth to change VCS, it would be much wiser to use well-known one
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
>
> 1). http://bit.ly/d5UrtN
>
> 2). http://www.keltia.net/BSDCan/paper.pdf
>
> 3). http://bit.ly/97Y8Xi
>
> 4). Because CVS just does not do any of this.
>
> Make your final comparison here:
> http://bit.ly/cyQBn8
>
> For the sake of argument can you think of any reason to not switch ?
Why not
> No, 3-clause BSD license is compatible with GPLv3 [1] (you can follow
> multiple arrows on that figure). You can combine BSD-licensed code with
> GPLv3-licensed code and either use it privately or redistribute it under
> GPLv3. Pretty much the same as with GPLv2.
Surely.
>
> This actuall
Пересылаемое сообщение
28.10.09, 17:19, "Konstantin Tokarev" :
28.10.09, 16:42, "Konstantin Tokarev" :
Do you really need Qt Creator IDE as dependency? I guess you need install
qt4-qui-4.5.2 package, it will download qt4-core, qt4-qmake, qt4-uic, q
Throw this proprietary and veeery slow shit^Wsoftware out of ports tree!
19.10.09, 17:31, "Stephen Montgomery-Smith" :
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > 1wk...@gmail.com writes:
> >
> >> Unfortunately, the map_at_zero sysctl didn't work for me. The
> >> following massage still recorded in dmesg.
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
