Re: The vim port needs a refresh

2013-05-29 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 28 May 2013 06:08, "Jeremy Messenger" wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >> > On 24 May 2013 22:23, Kenta Suzumoto wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello

Re: The vim port needs a refresh

2013-05-27 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 24 May 2013 22:23, Kenta Suzumoto wrote: >> >> Hello all. The editors/vim port is currently a mess and needs some changes. >> >> - It fetches almost 700 patches from what seems like a dial-up connection in >> AUSTRALIA. >> >> You might as w

Re: New Port Options infrastructure bug

2013-05-09 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Steven Hartland wrote: > I've just been looking at devel/rubygem-multi_json and was > perplexed by how it wasn't saving my options. > > It seems that how the new port options infrastructure determines > where to load and store its configured options from is quite >

Re: [BRAINSTORM] shebang fixing framework

2013-05-02 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote: > W dniu 2013-05-02 20:29, Oliver Heesakkers pisze: > >> Op do 02 mei 2013 16:22:41 schreef Łukasz Wąsikowski: > >>> /usr/bin/env is not good in all the situation. Look at >>> www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=177481 - /usr/bin/env is not

Re: Status/version of graphics/png?

2013-04-28 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Chris Rees: > >> What new features are you trying to take advantage of with png? > > I went to the libpng website and couldn't find the desired changelog, but > found libpng 1.4.x and 1.5.x were still in active development, and there w

Re: optionsng not saving options on some ports

2013-04-24 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Once again I hit a case where a port being upgraded by portmaster asked for > options configuration (dialog4ports) nd fails to either save it correctly > or to find the saved options. > > I ran portmaster to upgrade ruby18-bdb43. I was asked

Re: textproc / libxml2 failure to compile

2013-04-18 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2013-04-17 21:18:21 -0400, Jim Pazarena wrote: >> On 9.1 amd, something has changed within my ports. This compiled >> fine the very first time I installed 9.1, but a recent re-install >> g

Re: pkg replacement for pkg_sort?

2013-03-30 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 30 Mar 2013 14:53, "Robert Huff" wrote: >> >> >> Matthew Seaman writes: >> > On 30/03/2013 13:17, Robert Huff wrote: >> > >> > >Am I too much of a zombie this morning, or is there nothing in >> > > the man page about how to do this? >

Re: is it a good idea to overwrite GCC_DEFAULT_VERSION= in Mk/bsd.gcc.mk?

2013-03-28 Thread Jeremy Messenger
>> @@ -238 +238 @@ >> -sys_lib_search_path_spec="/usr/lib " >> >> +sys_lib_search_path_spec="/usr/local/lib/gcc47/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.0/4.7.3 >> /usr/local/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.0/lib /usr/local/lib/gcc47 /lib >> /usr/lib " Do you know if this part is need too? You can try

Re: is it a good idea to overwrite GCC_DEFAULT_VERSION= in Mk/bsd.gcc.mk?

2013-03-27 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Jeremy Messenger > wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Jeremy Messenger >>> wrote: &

Re: is it a good idea to overwrite GCC_DEFAULT_VERSION= in Mk/bsd.gcc.mk?

2013-03-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Jeremy Messenger > wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jeremy Messenger >>> wrote: >>

Re: is it a good idea to overwrite GCC_DEFAULT_VERSION= in Mk/bsd.gcc.mk?

2013-03-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jeremy Messenger > wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Anton Shterenlikht >>> wr

Re: is it a good idea to overwrite GCC_DEFAULT_VERSION= in Mk/bsd.gcc.mk?

2013-03-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Anton Shterenlikht > wrote: >> From andrew.w.nose...@gmail.com Mon Mar 25 18:09:38 2013 >> >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Gerald Pfeifer >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 25 Mar 2013,

Re: Updating poppler

2013-03-22 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote: > On 22.03.2013 08:25 (UTC+2), Leslie Jensen wrote: >> >> According to /usr/ports/UPDATING >> >> One should do >> >> portmaster -r poppler-0 >> >> Unfortunately it gives me this: >> >> ===>>> Launching child to reinstall libreoffice-4.0.1 >> >

Re: ports/175276: [patch] devel/py-gobject OPTIONSFILE eval order problem

2013-03-19 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Koop Mast wrote: > On 19-3-2013 17:56, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> >> Sorry, this is way too long to read. I will just skip the read and >> post my suggest of solution to this problem in the top of your email. >> I think the O

Re: ports/175276: [patch] devel/py-gobject OPTIONSFILE eval order problem

2013-03-19 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Sorry, this is way too long to read. I will just skip the read and post my suggest of solution to this problem in the top of your email. I think the OPTIONS needs to change from ${UNIQUENAME} to ${PKGORIGIN:S/\//_/}. It will be looked like "${PORT_DBDIR}/cat_port/options". Here's example: In bsd.o

Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports

2013-03-18 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mar 18, 2013 2:24 PM, "Baptiste Daroussin" wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 02:15:51PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > On Mar 18, 2013 12:42 PM, "Baptiste Daroussin" wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The autotools al

Re: [CFT] add a config.site cache for the ports

2013-03-18 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mar 18, 2013 12:42 PM, "Baptiste Daroussin" wrote: > > Hi, > > The autotools allows us to have a config.site cache where we define our defaults > values for a couple of things, and prevent the "slow" and possibly wrong > autodetection. > > Here is a patch that makes use of it: > http://people.f

Re: Ocaml ports needs love

2013-02-28 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:09 AM, b.f. wrote: >>I received a lot of complaint about ocaml being in a bad shape: lang/ocaml >>being >>outdated, lots of ocaml ports not being carefully maintained and updated. >> >>I personnally know nothing about ocaml so I'm not able to actually be helpful >>to >>

Re: recent port upgrades causing missing libraries

2012-12-11 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Jeremy Messenger > wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Bryan Drewery >> wrote: >>> On 12/11/2012 10:21 AM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012

Re: [RFC/HEADSUP] portmaster default -w (preserve shared libraries)

2012-12-11 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 11 Dec 2012 16:44, "Alex Dupre" wrote: >> >> Jeremy Messenger ha scritto: >> >> >> Absolutely yes from me. The -w option is real lifesaver and should be >> >> on by default. &g

Re: recent port upgrades causing missing libraries

2012-12-11 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 12/11/2012 10:21 AM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Bryan Drewery >> wrote: >>> On 12/11/2012 9:03 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: >>>> I used poudriere to build pkgng package

Re: [RFC/HEADSUP] portmaster default -w (preserve shared libraries)

2012-12-11 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> (As maintainer) I'm proposing to make -w the default for portmaster. >> This will preserve old shared libraries when upgrading. This helps 2 things: >> >> 1. Prevents a broken system

Re: recent port upgrades causing missing libraries

2012-12-11 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 12/11/2012 9:03 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: >> I used poudriere to build pkgng packages from the latest round >> of port updates since the freeze. I know in the commit message >> for xcb-util it bumped some other ports, but it seems like no

Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk

2012-10-11 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:33 AM, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote: > Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > [...] > > >> I have made suggests on what to do. Please contact with A.J. Kehoe IV. >> I suggested him to create a team to work on get rid of HAVE_GNOME. He >> even ha

Re: MATE 'base' desktop is ready for anyone to test it.

2012-10-10 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Jeremy Messenger > wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> The MATE base desktop (x11/mate-base) is ready to use and test. The >> MATE base is a very lite and lean desktop. > > >

Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk

2012-10-10 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:33:22PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:25:27 +0200 >>> Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>

Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk

2012-10-10 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:33:22PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:25:27 +0200 >> Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:18:50PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> > > Hi >> > > >> > > I noticed

Re: [CORRECTION] Change to the header in ports Makefiles, take two

2012-09-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Abthorpe > wrote: >> It was recently posted on, >> http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/ >> that we would adopt a new header for the ports Makefiles.

Re: pkgng default schedule... registering a few reasons for rethinking the final implementation...

2012-08-23 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kris Moore wrote: > On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: >> I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of >> /var/db/pkg as a package registry... I use each /var/db/pkg directory as a >> database into the port installation/sta

Re: [CFT] [bsd.port.mk] ports ccache build support

2012-08-05 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 5 August 2012 04:15, RW wrote: >>> On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 17:38:44 -0700 >>> Eitan Adler wrote: >> >>> Why isn't it? In that scenario /var/cache wouldn't be writable. >> >> IMHO the dire

Here's unfinish LightDM port.

2012-08-04 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Hello all, I have promised about that I will clean up and post the unfinished LightDM port for anyone that who want to finish it. When I discovered about x11/slim and I have lost interest to work more on LightDM as I have enough stuff on my plate. Keep in mind, it only will taking you to the log i

Re: May I update www/linux-opera to 12.00?

2012-08-04 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 01.08.2012 04:19, schrieb Jeremy Messenger: >> May I commit the update of www/linux-opera to 12.00? Here's patch: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/linux-opera.diff > > Not speaking on behalf of t

May I update www/linux-opera to 12.00?

2012-07-31 Thread Jeremy Messenger
May I commit the update of www/linux-opera to 12.00? Here's patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/linux-opera.diff Thanks, Mezz -- mezz.free...@gmail.com - m...@freebsd.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gn...@freebsd.org __

Re: MATE 'base' desktop is ready for anyone to test it.

2012-07-31 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Hello all, > > The MATE base desktop (x11/mate-base) is ready to use and test. The > MATE base is a very lite and lean desktop. The MATE base list can be > viewed at http://wiki.mate-desktop.org/building . I will add more

Re: MATE 'base' desktop is ready for anyone to test it.

2012-07-28 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Finally got mate-utils ported that has screenshot app. Here's two screenshots. It's what it looks like for default of MATE Desktop. It looks pretty much same with GNOME 2 beside that background and probably themes. http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/freebsd-mate0.png http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz

Re: MATE 'base' desktop is ready for anyone to test it.

2012-07-28 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On 7/27/12 3:44 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Jeremy Messenger >> wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> The MATE base desktop (x11/mate-base) is ready to use and test.

Re: MATE 'base' desktop is ready for anyone to test it.

2012-07-27 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Hello all, > > The MATE base desktop (x11/mate-base) is ready to use and test. The > MATE base is a very lite and lean desktop. A bit of FAQ: Q: There is problem with pkg-plist. A: Yes, I know about that. The reason

MATE 'base' desktop is ready for anyone to test it.

2012-07-27 Thread Jeremy Messenger
sword for some reasons. I will clean up the x11/lightdm and pass on to anyone that who want to finish it (got bored with it for me when I found x11/slim). Please continue to read to the bottom. Cheers, Mezz -- Forwarded message -- From: Jeremy Messenger Date: Fri, Jul 27, 20

Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)

2012-07-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 7/26/2012 7:41 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote: >> >> Jase Thew wrote: >> > On 25/07/2012 23:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> > > because the priority goes to global to specific and the most specific >> is the >> > > options file. >> > > >> >

Re: How to remove erroneous deps from pkgng

2012-07-22 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/22/2012 07:51, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> You need to start to respect the people's work and plan, Doug. Also I >> am part of team that maintaining the bsd.gnome.mk. Yes it will be >> re-add if anyone plan to re

Re: Re: How to remove erroneous deps from pkgng

2012-07-22 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 09:51:40 -0500 Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> You need to start to respect the people's work and plan, Doug. Also I >> am part of team that maintaining the bsd.gnome.mk. Yes it will be >> re-add i

Re: How to remove erroneous deps from pkgng

2012-07-22 Thread Jeremy Messenger
of them are currently relying on the run-dep side effect. I can't see > any reason NOT to do this, but if you have an objection please speak up > sooner rather than later. > > On 07/21/2012 21:33, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote:

Re: How to remove erroneous deps from pkgng

2012-07-21 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/21/2012 13:48, Jason E. Hale wrote: > >> IMO I don't really see what the hurry is. This has been the behavior for >> years. > > Yes, and some of us have been annoyed by it for years as well. :) > > The current behavior is wrong, and beco

Re: How to remove erroneous deps from pkgng

2012-07-20 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > For those that are confused about why they are receiving this message, > ongoing discussion in ports@ as to the fact that pkg-config should not > be a run-dep for any ports. > > > On 07/20/2012 15:26, Doug Barton wrote: > >> http://people.freeb

Re: How to remove erroneous deps from pkgng

2012-07-20 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Reko Turja wrote: > I'm testing out the pkgng system and somehow a port managed to pull > devel/pkg-config into one low level port polluting whole db. "pkg check" > just wants to install the annoying thing. Is there any way to get rid of > that erroneous dependenc

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-16 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/07/2012 05:22, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> It's one of reason why I do not agree to remove the shared library >> version from the LIB_DEPENDS, so that way in future someone can add >> support in the package

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-15 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2012-Jul-12 10:01:10 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>What is pkg >>--- >>pkg is a new package manager for FreeBSD. It is designed as a replacement for >>the pkg_* tools, and as a full featured binary package manager. > > A coup

Re: Port system "problems"

2012-06-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote: > For the GNOME question, if an option in the GNOME configuration port says > "[x] Yelp, will break help menus if not set", then no problem, don't you > think ? It doesn't make any sense to do that. KDE and GNOME are a bloat desktop, a

Re: Port system "problems"

2012-06-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:34:00AM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote: >> Matthew Seaman : >> >> > On 26/06/2012 08:26, Marcus von Appen wrote: >> 1. Ports are not modular >> > >> >>> What do you mean by modular? if you are speaking abou

Re: Port system "problems"

2012-06-25 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Florent Peterschmitt wrote: > Hello, > > I'm not a developer and I know how it's difficult to make a port (or some > ports, for example VirtualBox) but I think the port system has many > "problems": > > 1. Ports are not modular > 2. Option system is not really well

Re: Why are you NOT using FreeBSD --> an example

2012-06-12 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:53:04AM +0700, Erich wrote: >> Hi, > > Hi, Do we really need another one of these pointless rambling threads... Do not reply to the thread and it will die quickly. Quiet simple. -- mezz.free...@gmail.com

Re: Firefox 13

2012-06-07 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Niclas Zeising wrote: > >> On 2012-06-07 17:47, Warren Block wrote: >>> >>> Yesterday, Firefox 13 built and installed quickly.  It was just the >>> running part that did not go so well.  Coredumps on start, it would >>> star

Re: Need to depend on right libssh.so.4

2012-05-29 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Hi. > > Can please somebody suggest how to do this right. In security/hydra/Makefile > I have this: > > LIB_DEPENDS+=   ssh.4:${PORTSDIR}/security/libssh > > But if I try to make this, there will be no security/libssh installed. It is >

Re: xorg problems

2012-05-24 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Jacques Chanel wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:53:41PM +0200, Koop Mast wrote: >> Can people try this and see if it fixes the problems? >> http://people.freebsd.org/~kwm/patch-cairo >> Just put it in x11-servers/xorg-server/files/ and rebuild xorg-server. >> W

Re: Evince fails upgrade

2012-05-24 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Robert wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2012 22:43:51 -0700 > Kevin Oberman wrote: > >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Robert wrote: >> > >> > Hello Port readers >> > >> > I am unable to upgrade to latest evince due to following failure. >> > Evince now calls for www/ye

Re: xorg problems

2012-05-22 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Koop Mast wrote: > On 22-5-2012 23:48, Warren Block wrote: >> >> On Tue, 22 May 2012, Gök?in Akdeniz wrote: >> >>> If you downgrade "cairo port" it will be ok. If you update ports tree >>> with csup try portdowngrade. If not try to get the old version of ciaro >>>

Re: xorg problems

2012-05-22 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Warren Block wrote: > Since a port upgrade yesterday, there have been some occasional graphical > garblings in text in terminal windows and title bars.  My saved example went > away when X went away.  Rebuilding everything the xfce4 port depended on > doesn't seem

Re: [RFC] Seeking Approval: include bsd.port.pre.mk so SRC_BASE is defined before referenced

2012-05-22 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: >> Unfortunately certain things need to be defined before bsd.port.pre.mk >> is included.  So, pointy hat to me for giving bad advice. >> >> These show up immediately as "bad distinfo" probl

Re: port dependencies with port options

2012-04-20 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Chris Inacio wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Jeremy Messenger > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Vitaly Magerya >> wrote: >> > Chris Inacio wrote: >> >> I wanted to add an o

Re: port dependencies with port options

2012-04-20 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Chris Inacio wrote: >> I wanted to add an option to multiple ports - that is easy.  But, those >> ports have a dependency relationship, and I only want the last node in the >> port dependency graph to build with that option if the requisite

Re: new port request

2012-03-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, AN wrote: > I would like to request the following app be added to the ports tree.  I am > not a developer or I would try to do it myself. > > Packet Tracer Version 5.3.3 > > > It is a Cisco application that is very helpful for learning networking, and > studying f

Re: lang/lua: It does need gmake.

2012-03-16 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:49 AM, b. f. wrote: > Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> > On Mar 15, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> >> Figured out. Add custom CFLAGS in the make.conf and you will get a >>

Re: lang/lua: It does need gmake.

2012-03-15 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Mar 15, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> Figured out. Add custom CFLAGS in the make.conf and you will get a >> build failure with make but not gmake. Here's what I have in my >> make.conf: >> >

Re: lang/lua: It does need gmake.

2012-03-15 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2012-03-15 20:50, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> I get a build failure on amd64: >> >> - >> /usr/bin/ld: lapi.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `luaO_nilobject_' >> can n

lang/lua: It does need gmake.

2012-03-15 Thread Jeremy Messenger
I get a build failure on amd64: - /usr/bin/ld: lapi.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `luaO_nilobject_' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC lapi.o: could not read symbols: Bad value *** Error code 1 - I

Re: libtool question again

2012-03-12 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alex Dupre wrote: > Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: >>> USE_AUTOTOOLS=       libtool >>> USE_GNOME=   ltverhack >>> >>> to avoid bumping. >> >> I'm using it and it doesn't help: libgnutls.so.47 becomes >> libgnutls.so.48 (where 48 is 'current'). > > Probably you have not s

graphics/ocaml-images: Fix the path in the ld.conf (OCAML_LDCONFIG).

2012-02-06 Thread Jeremy Messenger
When I build a few of ocaml ports and I always noticed that I get this warning: ocamlfind: [WARNING] Cannot read directory /usr/local/lib/ocaml/site-lib/images which is mentioned in ld.conf Decided to dig it in and found a problem. # grep site-lib/images /var/db/pkg/ocaml-images-3.0.2_7,2/+CONTE

security/ocaml-cryptokit: Move back in ${LOCALBASE}/lib/ocaml/.

2012-01-27 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Can you move security/ocaml-cryptokit's files from lib/ocaml/site-lib/ back to lib/ocaml/? It's what default in the original Makefile. /work/cryptokit-1.3/Makefile: --- [...] # Where to install the library. By default: OCaml's standard library directory. INSTALLDIR=`$(OCAMLC) -wher

Re: www/transmission-web: make patch fails

2011-06-30 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Barbara wrote: > # make patch > ===>  License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > ===>  Extracting for transmission-web-2.32 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for transmission-2.32.tar.xz. > ===>  Patching for transmission-web-2.32 > ===>  Applying FreeBSD patche

Re: sqlite3 3.7.7 and svn

2011-06-30 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > It seems that update from sqlite3 3.7.6.3 to 3.7.7 breaks svn, It has been fixed in 3.7.7.1, you can try to update (not in ports yet) and see if it works. http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-06/index.shtml#858 http://svn.haxx.se/dev/arch

Re: Call for testers -- CONF_FILES variable

2011-06-29 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > Dear all, > > I've rewritten the CONF_FILES handling after talking to bapt@, and > I've done away with the > colon-separated tuples -- they're overcomplicated. > > The result is something like MAN and PORTDOCS (indeed most of the code > is stole

Re: Status of ${HAVE_GNOME:xxx} and dependencies

2011-06-29 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:23 AM, David Demelier wrote: > On 27/06/2011 13:42, David Demelier wrote: >> >> Hello there, >> >> There is something I don't understand well. I installed eclipse a long >> time ago because I needed it for a java project. As you may know eclipse >> use a lot of gnome depe

Re: saving a few ports from death

2011-04-25 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 04/25/2011 17:28, martinko wrote: >> >> Ok, >> I skimmed through the list of deprecated ports and I identifed the >> following that I may be using or at least used in past and I could take >> over their maintenance to save them from death: >

Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-daemon-2.22

2011-04-16 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:13 PM, MaamuT wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for my funny english, but i'm french and i don't speak very well… (thx > google trad ;) ) > > I found a litle bug in transmission-daemon web interface in fresh install by > the ports on freebsd. > > The tab_backgrounds_highlight.png

Re: Help with first port Makefile

2011-03-28 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Rod Person writes: > >> If I put: >>       USE_GNOME= yes >> in the Makefile everything builds great, but it checks for dependencies >> that aren't needed by Fotoxx. All I want to check is to make sure gtk20 >> is installed. I have t

Re: tracking lib dependencies

2011-03-16 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > > Jeremy Messenger writes: > >>  > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.38" not found, >> required by "libavahi-glib.so.1" >>  > >>  > Command >> '['

Re: tracking lib dependencies

2011-03-16 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Robert Huff wrote: > >        When trying to rebuild avahi after the recent upgrade, I get: > > signals-marshal.c:186: warning: ISO C forbids conversion of object pointer to > function pointer type > >  CC     libavahi_gobject_la-ga-client-enumtypes.lo > >  CC  

Re: webkit-gtk2-1.2.7 doesn't upgrade after changing python to 2.7

2011-03-14 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Gritsuk Anton wrote: > HI! > > Now i'm using FreeBSD 8.2 (r219048): >  # uname -srm >  FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE i386 > > I upgraded and replaced my Python 2.6 to 2.7 and all packages is related of > this. I use instruction from /usr/ports/UPDATING: >  # portupgrade -o l

Re: Fwd: prelminary analysis of the gmake3.82 -exp run

2011-03-13 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:39:26AM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: >> Augmented with a crude estimate of ports affected by these breakages >> (via grepping INDEX, basically). > > With a little detective work, you can get that from pointyhat.  e.

Re: prelminary analysis of the gmake3.82 -exp run

2011-03-12 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > I recent did a first-pass experimental ports run with gmake3.82.  The > results from that were pretty bad: 38 confirmed errors (5 more possible), > with ~1100 ports as collateral damage, mostly from audio/portaudio and > devel/p5-Module-Build.

Re: [HEADS UP] GNU make 3.82

2011-03-12 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Ade Lovett wrote: >> Work is now underway to bring GNU make 3.82 into the tree.  Sadly, there are >> a number of rather unfortunate backwards incompatibility issues between this &g

Re: [HEADS UP] GNU make 3.82

2011-03-12 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Ade Lovett wrote: > Work is now underway to bring GNU make 3.82 into the tree.  Sadly, there are > a number of rather unfortunate backwards incompatibility issues between this > and 3.81 which makes a simple replacement unworkable. > > A new port, devel/gmake381

Re: net-p2p/transmission-gtk2 fails to build

2011-03-06 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > 05.03.2011 17:29, Anonymous пишет: >> >> Ruslan Mahmatkhanov  writes: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I'm trying to update transmission 2.13 ->  2.22 on 8-stable. >>> >>> Errors like this: >>> ../libtransmission/libtransmission.a(handshake.o)(.text+

Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-2.22

2011-03-06 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Grzegorz Blach wrote: > On 03/06/2011 12:55, David Demelier wrote: >> On 06/03/2011 07:21, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >>> 06.03.2011 05:18, Alex V. Petrov пишет: FreeBSD alex.super 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #116: Thu Mar 3 21:55:50 KRAT 2011 alex@

Re: libksba update broken

2010-12-23 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Greg Larkin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jeremy Messenger wrote: >>> In the next version or next shared library bump, can you following add this? >> >>> USE_AUTOTOOLS=       libtool >>&

Re: libksba update broken

2010-12-18 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Greg Larkin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Demelier wrote: >> On 16/12/2010 16:44, Greg Larkin wrote: >> David Demelier wrote: > Hello, > > gnupg and libksba are not installed : > > ===>     Verifying install

Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-daemon-2.04_1

2010-11-16 Thread Jeremy Messenger
I will update it to 2.12 in this week. Cheers, Mezz On Oct 22, 2010 8:15 PM, "Jeremy Messenger" wrote: > 2010/10/21 Вадим Петряев : >> Hello! >> >> >> >> Transmission was two times released after version 2.04 >> https://trac.transmissionbt.com

Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-daemon-2.04_1

2010-10-24 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Anonymous wrote: > Jeremy Messenger writes: > >> 2010/10/21 Вадим Петряев : >>> Transmission was two times released after version 2.04 >>> https://trac.transmissionbt.com/roadmap?show=completed >>> >>> 10 Oc

Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-daemon-2.04_1

2010-10-22 Thread Jeremy Messenger
2010/10/21 Вадим Петряев : > Hello! > > > > Transmission was two times released after version 2.04 > https://trac.transmissionbt.com/roadmap?show=completed > > 10 October released 2.10 and 17 October released 2.11 > > May be you need some help for port maintenance? > > As I understand, this port re

Re: www/linux-opera 10.60 patch...

2010-07-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:46:11 -0500, Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:10:57 -0500 "Jeremy Messenger" wrote: Hello all, A few of you have asked me about patch of linux-opera update to 10.60. Here: http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/linux-opera1060.diff The flash p

Changed mezz's email address..

2010-07-16 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Hello all, Just let every one know about that I have changed my email address from me...@cox.net to mezz.free...@gmail.com. Be sure to update your contact/address book list. If you have m...@freebsd.org then you don't have to do anything as it will go straight to my new address. The reason is to u

www/linux-opera 10.60 patch...

2010-07-14 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Hello all, A few of you have asked me about patch of linux-opera update to 10.60. Here: http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/linux-opera1060.diff The flash plugin 10.1 has an issue of sometimes the mouse click does not work. I am not sure if it's Opera 10.60 or flash plugin 10.1 issue as I

Re: FreeBSD Port: gimp-2.6.9,2

2010-07-14 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:01:18 -0500, Frank A. Greco wrote: HI, I'm running 8.0-RELEASE, amd64. The port installs fine as a package but when I try to run gimp I get an error message that gegl 0.1.2 needs to be updated to gegl 0.0.18. The description of the port says that gegl 0.1.2 is re

Re: -- SPAM -- Re: transmission 1.93 update

2010-07-01 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 05:16:15 -0500, Anonymous wrote: "Jeremy Messenger" writes: On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:45:35 -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: I would like to run transmission 2.0, would you mind posting a patch? Sure, here: http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/transmission201.

Re: transmission 1.93 update

2010-06-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:45:35 -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:12:54 -0500, Anonymous wrote: "Dutchman01" writes: Hi, Any plans to upgrade transmission 1.93 to 2.0 version in the freebsd tree?

Re: transmission 1.93 update

2010-06-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:12:54 -0500, Anonymous wrote: "Dutchman01" writes: Hi, Any plans to upgrade transmission 1.93 to 2.0 version in the freebsd tree? When it's ready. Better ask mezz@, I'm not the maintainer. If you're that impatient try my patch below. Thanks for patch. I have

Re: commit PR ports/146582: [PATCH]textproc/libxml2

2010-06-23 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:11:49 -0500, Alexander Kriventsov wrote: On 22.06.2010 19:11, Chris Rees wrote: On 22 June 2010 15:21, Alexander Kriventsov wrote: Hello! Can anybody commit this http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146582? You need to ask the Gnome team to approve it first.

Re: [Call for Testing] X.org 7.5 for FreeBSD

2010-03-20 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:47:22 -0600, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: Update On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Gary Jennejohn wrote: Well, I don't know whether this is really relevant, but I noticed that xfce4-session actually depends on dbus-glib and not dbus. It might be necessary to reinstall d

Re: [Call for Testing] X.org 7.5 for FreeBSD

2010-03-18 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:44:14 -0600, Martin Wilke wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Call for Testing Xorg 7.5 Howdy! We're happy to announce that Xorg 7.5 is ready for public testing. The ATI and Intel drivers were patched to work with the new server, please report any pro

  1   2   3   4   5   >