On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 17:30:52 -0500
Mark Felder wrote:
>
> > On Jul 18, 2015, at 06:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I have some machines on which, for various reasons, only ports are
> > used.
> >
> > On
Hi,
I have some machines on which, for various reasons, only ports are used.
On upgrading ports, I keep running into the the fact that
/var/db/pkg/vuln.xml is lagging behind /usr/ports/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
which is updated via portsnap (and thus upgrading the vulnerable ports
fails).
So I'
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 22:19:10 +0200
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For pkg 1.5.0 we do plan to provide a default pkg.conf full of useful
> aliases, of course this is subjective, if you think you have added
> some useful aliases into your pkg.conf please share those so we can
> add them direct
I have no problem integrating this patch, but it should be really
submitted upstream ...
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:16:37 -0800
birch wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Just did an upgrade to FreeBSD 9.1 and I noticed that the apcupsd
> port still has this crash and requires the patch. It would be
> fantast
Hi,
I'm seeing this size mismatch, any idea what it is about?
root(itetcu)@it/SU >-SSH-> /usr/ports/devel/llvm [23:50:47] 0
# make
===> Found saved configuration for llvm-3.1
=> llvm-3.2.src.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
=> Attempting to fetch http://llvm.org/releases/
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 20:27:46 +0200
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 02:38:34PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I'm seeing shhguard-ipfw sig 10 on start on my machines updated to
> > 9-STABLE (eg. FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #
Hi,
I'm seeing shhguard-ipfw sig 10 on start on my machines updated to 9-STABLE
(eg.
FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #5 r244924: Tue Jan 1 19:45:55 EET 2013
:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
) while on some -PRERELEASE it's running fine.
Anyone seeing something similar?
#0 0x000800b7dced in ge
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:29:20 +1100
"Dewayne" wrote:
> Hi itetcu,
>
> Thank-you for maintaining this port, however on 9.1Release the
> package isn't being built.
>
> Would you please review the pkg-plist for /usr/ports/sysutils/nut.
> The file libexec/nut/newmge-shut isn't being created, or shoul
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 09:16:20 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 02/12/2012 08:26, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > BTW, I'm seeing this on my machines:
> > Checking timestamps on options makefiles: cache-update: WARNING
> > unknown options file "/var/db/ports/rsync/optio
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:49:51 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 02/12/2012 08:22, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > You might want to try ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex
> > cache-init(1) will take that half an hour, but after that updating
> > the INDEX will take a minute or so (
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:12:45 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 02/12/2012 06:50, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> > It takes about half an hour on my dog slow intel atom D510. Is there
> > anything in the works to speed up 'make index'? I understand that
> > the slowest part is the evaluation of dependenci
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 08:50:18 +0200
Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Kevin Oberman
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Eitan Adler
> > wrote:
> >> On 1 December 2012 11:46, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I don't know the details abo
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:28:30 +0100
"Ronald Klop" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the same libpng error when starting Opera 12.11 as already
> mentioned on this list. I happen to run KDE and ktrace shows me it
> crashes while reading icons like
> /usr/local/kde4/share/icons/oxygen/64x64/mimetypes/unk
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:01:09 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, Oleg Ginzburg wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 25 August 2012 18:06:29 Warren Block wrote:
> >> Discovered last night that sysutils/apcupsd will not compile on
> >> 9-stable amd64 if the USB or SNMP options are enabled.
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:11:03 -0400
Rich Neese wrote:
> On 6/15/2012 5:08 PM, Robert Simmons wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
> >> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of
> >> getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only
> >>
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
"Waitman Gobble" wrote:
> dude like since MS bought it they haven't even released any non-win32
> version. i agree, a different alternative to skype is better, and get
> your contacts to join up with that.
If you don't count Mac, Android, and some other .
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:56:51 +0800
Martin Wilke wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 23:41:05 +0300
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>
> > Last time I tested, yes, that was one of the problems.
> > Current beta from skype is at .99, you could give it a try, but I
> > don't expect
[ PLEASE don't top-post, ktnx ]
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:29:58 +0300
Sulev-Madis Silber wrote:
> Well, I admit that this short summary was little too big. Bigger than
> the another report that regularly ends up in ports@
>
> Maybe big maintainer groups need different approach to this. And this
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 19:50:52 +0200 (CEST)
Juergen Lock wrote:
> In article <20120604120054.GA1849@tiny> you write:
> >Hi,
> Hi!
> >
> >I run 10-CURRENT r235646 and CVS updated ports (both from May, 19);
> >
> >skype-2.1.0.81,1 is working fine, uncluding viedo: the port
> >net-im/skype-devel still
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:00:34 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> > While I think makefile-options is the way to go, I should also
> > point out that for the specific case of emacs and X11, it is
> > not used due to the very large differences. Other "variants"
> > are ha
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:11:20 +0200
Alex Kozlov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 07:49:06AM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > On 2/15/12 7:15 AM, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> >> Many of those errors was already fixed, thanks to eadler@
> >> I will upload updated list.
> > can we get them all, and get th
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:49:00 -0500
Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>
> On 2/14/12 11:18 AM, Mikhail T. wrote:
> > On 14.02.2012 10:25, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> >> EXAMPLESDIR
> >
> > I thought, EXAMPLESDIR is for actual examples, such as source code,
> > not compiled and fully-functional executab
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:00:04 +0100
Thomas Zander wrote:
> > But the takeaway is that we can't expect the PR submitters, or even
> > port maintainers, to get anything right. It sure makes life easier
> > when they do, but we can't take it for granted.
> > As committers, we are that QA step.
>
> A
need to look at it.
Yes, but at least some kind of check if the service actually started,
some echo in the console / logging would be veyr good.
> From:
> owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org] on
> behalf of Ion-
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:41:27 -0600
Mark Felder wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:16:45 -0600, Boris Samorodov
> wrote:
>
> > The problem is: while start-up zoneminder is launched after mysql
> > was started but is not responding yet. Then zoneminder can't
> > register it's cameras, etc. This hack
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 09:35:03 -0500
Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Doug Barton writes:
>
> > >> Read /usr/ports/UPDATING?
> > >
> > > If you mean 20110928 - that identifies the problem, and
> > > provides workarounds, but does not name the pr.
> >
> > What are you trying to accomplish?
>
>
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:56:05 +0200
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 13/12/2011 19:22 Julien Laffaye said the following:
> > On 12/13/2011 06:16 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 30/11/2011 22:32 Julien Laffaye said the following:
> >>> [1] : https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues
> >>> [2] : https://github.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 13:36:47 +0800
Buganini wrote:
> 2011/12/4 Rene Ladan :
> > What about turning it into a bsd..mk target, e.g. :
> > WEBSITE=some-website
> > DISTFILES=same-as-usual
> > MANUAL_DISTFILES=distfile1 distfile2 ...
>
> What if there are multiple sites/path and files?
> Multiple sit
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:02:38 -0600
Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long
> time, since it seem that to put a
>
> .if defined(USE_PURE)
> .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk"
> .endif
>
> In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice. Thoug
Just go ahead and commit them all. Thanks.
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:34:01 -0500
Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following ports have a small typo in the COMMENT line. Can you
> please commit the change below or permit me to commit this patch?
>
> Index: iso12083/Makefile
>
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:42:00 +0400
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Erwin Lansing wrote on 27.10.2011 14:21:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:44:34PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> >>>>> What, on the other hand, makes sense is to have the fix that
> >>&
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:31:36 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:04:20 -0700
> Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:59:38 +0300
> > Ion-Mihai Tetcu mentioned:
> >
> > > Unfortunately we don't seem to have any other way
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:58:40 +0100
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On amd64 with the newvers.sh fix to "9.9"
> (9.9-CURRENT #2 r226525M:):
>
> ===> Configuring for libtool-2.4_1
> configure: error: working directory cannot be determined
> ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
> Please repor
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:04:20 -0700
Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:59:38 +0300
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu mentioned:
>
> > Unfortunately we don't seem to have any other way to go, for the
(and yes, I hate the idea)
> > big majority of the ports. The fix is
[ slightly reordered ]
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:31:46 +1100
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> [trimming cc list]
>
> On 2011-Oct-17 13:51:30 -0700, Stanislav Sedov
> wrote:
> >ones (like GCC). So why not commit that patch as a KNOB to
> >bsd.port.mk like it was initially proposed and let people use it in
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 01:01:00 -0700
Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:50:48 +0300
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu mentioned:
>
> >
> > Did you do a full run with the patch? Can you provide the list of
> > ports that aren't fixed by the patch and the
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:50:48 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:52:54 +
> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote:
>
> > On 17. Oct 2011, at 20:51 , Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I shrinked that Cc: list dramatically.
&
nning an other -exp with jpeg fixed.
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:35:51 +0300
> > Ion-Mihai Tetcu mentioned:
> >
> >>
> >> Here's a little status update:
> >> We iterated through a few -exp runs (basically for ports/161404 --
> >> commit
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:13:30 +0200
Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu
> wrote:
> >> If you have both kdenetwork3 and 4, well, I don't know. You can try
> >> proceeding with that step and seeing if kdenetwork3 still works,
>
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:08:57 +0200
Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Andrea Venturoli
> wrote:
> > Using KDE3, I have ortp as a dependency of kdenetwork.
> > Should I follow the above or is it ok only for KDE4?
> > Is it needed? Would it harm anything?
>
> linphone-base is
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:36:03 +0200
Erwin Lansing wrote:
> Since the release has been pushed back some more since the last mail,
> we do have some time to test a possible fix for the issues we're
> seeing with libtool on FreeBSD 10.0. However, fixing libtool is only
> part of the problem as hundr
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:46:01 +1100
Alexey Golodov wrote:
> Looking through the ports, I see that sometimes maintrainers include
> in Makefile block with actions for maintrain port.
> There are different ways to define it (starting with MAINTRAINER_MODE
> in devel/git, and ends if user = $maintrai
... for helping me set my priorities strait. [2]
It used to be fun to be here.
I understand that, in general, people want to help.
I understand that there can be a lot of useful input from people that
actually do nothing or next to nothing in terms of coding, documenting
and so on.
I understa
on about Resurrecting dead ports with a
> >> quick cvs tutorial into the Porter's Handbook?
> >
> > why not writing a make target in bsd.port.mk to do it? cvs is in
> > base, after all. something like `make resurrect the/port`...
No. b.p.m is complex enough a
ones, but I still don't feel motivated to move (which brings
on the question of what WM I'll be using in a year or two).
> > Unless it's an easy fix, I doubt these kde3/qt3 programs will get
> > the attention needed to fix it.
>
> .. unfortunately :(
Yep.
--
I
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:40:39 +0400
Boris Samorodov wrote:
[ .. ]
> BTW, QAT was used to do experimental runs with non-default PREFIX.
> Those reports were very useful.
[ .. ]
Yeh, that was a second server "QATty", which used to run on some old
hardware of mine, toasted long since.
I'm tryin
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:02:33PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>> *DEPENDS and USE* are really the same thing, dependencies (with,
>maybe,
>> some rare exceptions). So I'd say they should go together.
>
>Precisely. That was my ori
xample:
>
> PORTNAME
> PORTVERSION
> etc
>
> MAINTAINER
> COMMENT
>
> LICENSE
>
> LIB_DEPENDS=
>
> BUILD_DEPENDS=
>
> RUN_DEPENDS=
>
> USE_FOO
> FOO_ARGS
> USE_BAR
>
> USERS
> GROUPS
*dEPENDS and USE* are really the same
d after I'll post the translation to my blog. The translation is
> intended only for web, no print copies planned.
[ .. ]
You should contact the ownerk of that site, "Dan Langille"
.
--
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
___
freebsd-ports@freebs
On Sun, 22 May 2011 16:01:37 +0200
Thierry Thomas wrote:
> On sun 22 mai 11 at 15:07:31 +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu
> wrote:
>
> > Index: Makefile
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/net-p2p/bitcoi
On Wed, 18 May 2011 19:01:31 -0400
Matthew Pounsett wrote:
>
> Based on the responses here it sounds like I've been doing nothing
> wrong so I played around a bit more. I guess in my testing there
> must've been some combination of things I didn't get right... I did a
> bunch more testing and e
On Sat, 21 May 2011 20:36:18 +0200
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> net-p2p/bitcoin (currently 0.3.21) fails, it tries to install
> wxgtk2-2.9.1 even if that one is already installed
[ .. ]
The actual problem is this:
===> bitcoin-0.3.21 depends on executable: include/wx-2.9/wx/aboutd
On Sun, 22 May 2011 21:21:44 +0900
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Sat, 21 May 2011 08:36:45 -0400
> > Jerry said:
>
> jerry> The port: "/net/sendemail" builds fine after the update to
> jerry> Perl; however, it no longer runs. It terminates with this
> jerry> error message:
>
>
verything inside the port - hence the longish
pkg-message - less steps to go through this way).
--
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:37:03 -0700
Ted Faber wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 07:28:35PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > But OK, I will, ports/UPDATING is cheap.
>
> And appreciated.
Done after sending the mail :)
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
&
On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:01:41 -0700
"Kevin Oberman" wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:38:58 +0300
> > From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu
> > Sender: owner-freebsd-emulat...@freebsd.org
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > As you may have noticed skype ports
etup outside skype before blaming skype /
mailing me.
--
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Sun, 15 May 2011 17:34:40 +0300
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 15/05/2011 17:30 ajtiM said the following:
> > H!
> >
> > I was stupid and update Skype to version 2.1.0.81and it is unusible
> > now. And what is the other problem I don't have previous version
> > which worked.
> >
> > What is a prob
On Mon, 09 May 2011 21:18:20 +0200
"Hartmann, O." wrote:
> Port x11/nvidia-driver fails with the the following error. This error
> obviously was introduced within the updates of the last few days,
> since building the specific port was possible before the last
> weekend. Does anyone has an idea?
FYI, you're gonna see a nice update in the following days :)
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s tree -- the closest thing to a different repo is a separate tree,
> for example [1].
>
> Chris
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/
Anyway, work is underway to fully support newer skype versions, and the
biggest part of the work in our linuxulator was done.
Again,
? It's partly lifted
> from the diablo
> ports; just makes it more convenient if one has the distfile already,
> as well as using
> IGNORE rather than BROKEN; we know it won't ever build.
>
> Chris
>
> [1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/skype-distfile
Skype.
It is, and it's kinda workoing on HEAD plus some patches.
One thing all of oyu could do is bug skype on their forums to provide
an OSS version; I recently argued about that with their linux product
manager, so more voices would help.
--
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
__
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 09:28:58 +0100
Chris Rees wrote:
> On 2 April 2011 09:26, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > Hi, folks!
> >
> > For example, i built in my tinderbox port audio/clementine-player...
> > It depends on qt4 -* ports...
> >
> > For example, the file qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.7.2.tar.gz
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 21:56:39 +0300
Subbsd wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Илья Ермолин
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I recently checked out, that on skype official site there is new
> > version of skype for linux. *Skype (beta) 2.1.0.81*
> >
> > Before that to get Skype work I follow some tip
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:40:18 -0800
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> >> The problem with != is that is is evaluated in a subshell
> >> regardless of whether the results are needed, and it happens while
> >> the Makefile is first being read, before it tr
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:31:37 -0600
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On January 26, 2011 8:18:18 PM +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:32:51 -0600
> > Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >
> >> A while ago someone posted a url to a website that explained
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:07:52 -0500
"Philip M. Gollucci" wrote:
> On 1/23/2011 10:32 PM, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Before I committed this update, I have tested lsof 4.85A on 8.1 and
> > it does work fine.
> > I don't think it is reasonable to remove the patch and prevent 8.1
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:32:51 -0600
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> A while ago someone posted a url to a website that explained, step by
> step, how to update a port using cvs and a temporary directory for
> the updated port. My google foo apparently isn't very good, because
> I can't seem to find it, and
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 04:30:16 -0800
Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 01:29, Norm Larkin
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was idly trying to experiment and decided I wanted to see how
> > long it took, how much disk space was involved, how hard it was on
> > a system, and so on, to build t
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:31:25 +0100
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:23:51 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:54:31 +0100
> > Paweł Pękala wrote:
>
> > > docbook2pdf is part of textproc/docbook-utils so now we have
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:54:31 +0100
Paweł Pękala wrote:
> Dnia 2010-12-11, o godz. 21:26:24
> Alexander Leidinger napisał(a):
>
> >
> >Pawel/Martin, yes, I would like to use the --disable-manual part
> >(building the manual by default) to offer the possibility to not have
> >that much dependenci
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:38:31 +0100
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 11.12.2010 21:35, schrieb Barbara:
> >
> >>On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 02:23:56 +0100 (CET)
> >>Barbara wrote:
> >>
> >>> It seems that starting with the comms/umcs7840 commit, INDEX-8
> >>> isn't updated running portsnap.
> >>>
> >>> for
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 02:23:56 +0100 (CET)
Barbara wrote:
> It seems that starting with the comms/umcs7840 commit, INDEX-8 isn't
> updated running portsnap.
>
> for example:
> $ ll /usr/ports/sysutils/webmin/Makefile
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3687 Dec 10 18:18
> /usr/ports/sysutils/webmin/Mak
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:27:02 -0800
Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Tue 07 Dec 2010 at 07:47:41 PST Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:27:54PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
> >> I'm getting a strange error while trying to install the handbrake
> >> port:
> >>
> >>
> >> ===> Configuring
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:41:29 -0500
Eitan Adler wrote:
> >>
> >> Curious - which one?
> >
> > OpenOffice(-3)?
>
> He told me on IRC - something in games/
>
> $grep -R "NO_PACKAGE" /usr/ports/games :-)
Hum, looks like either they got smaller or QAT doesn't have all the
games packages buil
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:07:51 +0200
Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> 30.11.2010 04:40, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> > You can specify limits during compression, so the question is
> > should we do that so that hosts with N MB of RAM can decompress
> > packages? Do we retain the compression ratio over bzip2
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 08:59:22 +0100 (CET)
"Ganael LAPLANCHE" wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:38:10 +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote
>
> Hi,
>
> > > It would be interesting to provide something like :
> > >
> > > USE_BASE= yes
> > > W
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:16:17 +0100 (CET)
"Ganael LAPLANCHE" wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:09:35 -0600, Ade Lovett wrote
>
> Hi Ade, hi Mark !
>
> > > Patch incorporating these suggestions, along with some other edge
> > > cases I found, uploaded:
> > >
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~linim
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:31:10 -0500
jhell wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 06:24, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > Am 28.11.2010 22:12, schrieb Goran Tal:
> >> Now that the base system supports xz compression, it should be
> >> used as the default compression for packages.
> >>
> >> Files compressed with xz are s
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:12:48 -0500
Goran Tal wrote:
> Now that the base system supports xz compression, it should be used as
> the default compression for packages.
>
> Files compressed with xz are smaller and decompress faster than those
> compressed with bzip2. This can make an installation mu
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:19:05 +
RW wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:22:57 -0800
> Charlie Kester wrote:
>
> > On Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 22:01:28 PST Janky Jay, III wrote:
> > >
> > >Almost anyone who is an only semi-serious port maintainer
> > > (meaning
> > >they only have a select few numbe
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:42:19 -0700
Cy Schubert wrote:
[ .. ]
> If
> /usr/local is mounted from a ZFS filesystem, it works. (Not sure
> about NFS but I suspect it might work too,)
[ .. ]
Yep.. I run mine with /usr.local being on ZFS.
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intel
Hi,
A new tool was just committed to ports, ports-mgmt/distilator.
It will check for you each of the MASTER_SITES of the port you call it
with.
I wold like to recommend that all the maintainers and commiters run it
just before submitting/committing. It's fast enough (it doesn't
download the DIST
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:43:23 +0100
John Bayly wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been working on getting the net port up to the current version
> (2.4.3), this was before I saw you take ownership of the port. I've
> currently got it at a stage where I feel it could be added to the
> ports tree. In addition
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:56:27 +0600
Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
> On 22.09.2010 22:24, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>
> >> I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
> >> http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
> >> (and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
> >&g
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:07:17 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Janne Snabb wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > > One issue with either Git or Mercurial is that they are GPL.
> > > AFAIK FreeBSD prefers to avoid GPL in the base or in critical
> > > widely-used in
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:33:53 +0200
Alexandre wrote:
> I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
> http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
> (and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
> When I go to the website of the project Fuse
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse/ , there is a more recen
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:38:28 -0400
jhell wrote:
> On 09/18/2010 07:17, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> >
> > I'm still to see a concise, clear, precise, listing of advantages
> > that switching from CVS would bring us,
> > that would overcome the effort ne
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:51:39 +0200
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 18/09/2010 01:13, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > jhell wrote:
> >
> >> ... Mercurial being the distributed version control that it is
> >> allows you to clone, make the changes you need to the clone test it
> >> thoroughly and the
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:12:02 +0200
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 17/09/2010 06:41, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 9/16/2010 6:15 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 9/16/2010 3:35 PM, Anonymous wrote:
> >>> Dominic Fandrey writes:
> >>>
> On 16/09/2010 19:17, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> > * Dominic Fa
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:45:47 +0800
Denny Lin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:35:43PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This 'stop the service before we install' seems to
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:29:02 +0900
Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Hi wxs and jpaetzel.
>
> I noticed that dhcpd server stoped after portupgrade,
> sometimes. It's a painful accident on my network. Because I didn't
> notice some troubles:-(.
>
> Why do you stop the daemons? Is it real
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:14:23 +0200
Grzegorz Blach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on enlightenment 0.17 ports at:
> http://dev.roorback.net/enlight-ports
> and I wanna have this ports in one single category called
> 'enlightenment',
> just like afterstep, gnome, kde, windowmaker.
>
> Now I have
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:01:42 +0300
marius adrian popa wrote:
> Hello i want to takeover the port maintenance for the following ports
>
> firebird20-server
> http://www.freshports.org/databases/firebird20-server
>
> and create the new ones for
>
> firebird2.1-server
> firebird2.5-server
>
> and
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:45:20 +0200
"Rodrigo OSORIO (ros)" wrote:
> --- Makefile 2010-08-29 21:34:42.0 +0200
> +++ Makefile.new 2010-08-29 21:37:11.0 +0200
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> # Date created: 16 July 2010
> # Whom:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:27:30 -0700
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/31/10 05:00, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > I have been using portmaster for updating the installed ports on
> > may machines -- thanks, Doug!
>
> My pleasure. :)
>
> > I'm in the habit of updating on a daily basis -- directly after the
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:12:11 -0500
Chad Howsden wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing in regards to the skype port for FreeBSD. I currently
> have the most recent build of FreeNAS running on a newer server box.
> If you are unaware, FreeNAS is built off of the FreeBSD system. I
> have successfully
both ports and also review
> > bsd.database.mk; if, after that, you still do not understand the current
> > behavior, let us know.
For short, it's like this because it (AFAIR) not all what we have now
in the framework we had back when I worte the port, and because I
wanted to also be able to depend on the server.
--
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ndles the selection
> of speller.
I am away right now, and with very bad abd random net access. I'm
afraid anything will have to wait until I get back, at the end of the
month.
Thanks for your work.
--
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
___
freebsd-ports@freebs
1 - 100 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
