Re: Request to review: print/texlive-install

2012-05-28 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
On 2012.05.28. 18:16, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 5/28/12 10:11 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: How about if I add lines like this: .if !defined(IGNORE_SECURITY_RISK) IGNORE= has a security risk because it downloads a file \ without a checksum. Define IGNORE_SECURITY_RISK to build

Re: [PATCH] upgrade shells/bash to version 4.0

2009-03-08 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
David O'Brien escribió: I need to get shells/bash repocopied before I can commit this. But I wanted to let folks play with the upgrade if they wanted to. I suggest using single distfile for both ones. I see that using this PATCHLEVEL method seems easier to handle when updating, but the other

Re: archivers/rar: lib32 is not actually needed on amd64

2008-11-24 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Andriy Gapon escribió: on 20/10/2008 17:14 Andriy Gapon said the following: I try to install archivers/rar on amd64 system without 32-bit userland (NO_LIB32) but with 32-bit support in kernel (COMPAT_IA32) and I get the following error: ** Port marked as IGNORE: archivers/rar: requir

Re: jakarta-tomcat v.s. tomcat

2008-11-10 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Yoshihiro Ota escribió: Hello, forks. There are 2 directories for apache-tomcat like the following. % ls -d */*tomcat* java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat www/tomcat41 www/jakarta-tomcat4 www/tomcat55 www/jakarta-tomcat5 www/tomcat6 www/tomcat-native When I diffed ver. 5 di

Re: Wacom driver

2008-11-05 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Dominic Fandrey escribió: I have created a port of Bartosz Fabianowski's Wacom driver. Since nobody has stepped forward to commit it, I thought I'd inform this list, so that people can test it. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128547 I suggest that you should consult with [EMAIL PRO

Re: Is postgresql83-server broken?

2008-08-29 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Palle Girgensohn escribió: I submitted a patch yesterday the I think fixes this problem. Please try upgrading, and if it still doesn't work, email me again. I had another problem with 8.3. After installing, initdb couldn't create a new database. I needed to get a PostgreSQL server installed qui

Re: bsd-grep-20080725_1 -v flag busted...

2008-08-04 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Chuck Swiger escribió: I'd just updated the BSD grep port to bsd-grep-20080725_1, but regrettably have noticed that many things using grep stopped working. For example, running GNU-style ./configure hangs here: configure: creating ./config.status load: 1.15 cmd: sh 72964 [runnable] 7.6

[Call for testers] "BSD ar" [Was: Fwd: cvs commit: ports/archivers Makefile ports/archivers/bsdar Makefile distinfo pkg-descr]

2008-01-18 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
As I discussed with Kai, I just added a port to make the testing of this cool new stuff easier. Enjoy! Regards, -- Gabor Kovesdan EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.kovesdan.org --- Begin Message --- gabor 2008-01-18 23:11:34 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files:

Re: Testing DESTDIR

2006-11-02 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Lupe Christoph írta: Hi! Im preparing an update to my Munin ports, and I would like to integrate DESTDIR support. Is there any way to test this short of duplicating the entire FreeBSD installation? Or to put it differently, does anybody have a list of things that need to be in the DESTDIR tree

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: psgconf-3.2.1 pkg-plist errors on i386 6-exp]

2006-08-29 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
No, actually it is the same. If you type make deinstall in the port directory, pkg_delete is called. Look at bsd.port.mk, about line 4300. Cheers, Gabor Jim Pirzyk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hmm, this is not quite the same. I need to know if I am deinstalling from

Re: DESTDIR implementation [Was:: ATTENTION: is the way DESTDIR was introduced completely wrong?]

2006-08-24 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
John E Hein wrote: Gábor Kövesdán wrote at 21:44 +0200 on Aug 23, 2006: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > mount_nullfs ${PORTSDIR} ${DESTDIR}${PORTSDIR} > > mount_nullfs ${WRKDIR} ${DESTDIR}${WRKDIR} > > mount_devfs foo ${DESTDIR}/dev > > chroot ${DESTDIR} cd ${.CURDIR}

Re: DESTDIR implementation [Was:: ATTENTION: is the way DESTDIR was introduced completely wrong?]

2006-08-23 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote: The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many years. And once you decide to go about fixing it, there's no way around that problem. My preferre

Re: DESTDIR implementation [Was:: ATTENTION: is the way DESTDIR was introduced completely wrong?]

2006-08-16 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:14:08PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:

Re: DESTDIR implementation [Was:: ATTENTION: is the way DESTDIR was introduced completely wrong?]

2006-08-16 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote: The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many year

HEADS-UP: [Fwd: Re: Future plans for DESTDIR]

2006-08-16 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Hi folks, sometimes good ideas come later, so please wait a bit with making your ports DESTDIR-aware. Kris had a very interesting suggestion. I wonder how we haven't thought of this so far. This needs a bit more of discussion, though, but if we can work this out a bit better, things will beco

Re: DESTDIR implementation [Was:: ATTENTION: is the way DESTDIR was introduced completely wrong?]

2006-08-16 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote: The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many years. And once you decide to go about fixing it, there's no way around that problem. My preferre

Re: ATTENTION: is the way DESTDIR was introduced completely wrong?

2006-08-15 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Dmitry Marakasov wrote: * G??bor K??vesd??n ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I agree with every your word. I was to implement it in this way, but as I said this would require us to change all of the *_DEPENDS lines. Erwin told me that this can't be happen, so I was pushed to go the another

Re: ATTENTION: is the way DESTDIR was introduced completely wrong?

2006-08-15 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Dmitry Marakasov wrote: What I propose is: - Change variable naming scheme. All *BASE and *DIR vars should be reverted to their original meanings (i.e. local paths). Instead, INSTALL_ vars should be introduced: INSTALL_LOCALBASE=${DESTDIR}/${LOCALBASE} INSTALL_X11BASE

DESTDIR implementation [Was:: ATTENTION: is the way DESTDIR was introduced completely wrong?]

2006-08-15 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Dmitry Marakasov wrote: Hi! I'm now exploring new DESTDIR-related stuff, and I find it far from being useable. More of that, DESTDIR-related changes seem dangerous to me. As far as I understand, for port to support DESTDIR, it's files should be installed into ${DESTDIR}/${PREFIX}/foo (aka ${TAR

Re: support for DESTDIR: security/openssh-portable

2006-08-11 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:25:38PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:59:18PM -0600, John E Hein wrote: John E Hein wrote at 17:43 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006: Well, the part that makes it annoying to duplicate i

Re: support for DESTDIR: security/openssh-portable

2006-08-10 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:59:18PM -0600, John E Hein wrote: John E Hein wrote at 17:43 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006: > Well, the part that makes it annoying to duplicate in all ports is not > the two separate words (CHROOT DESTDIR), but that you have to test > defined(DESTDIR

Re: support for DESTDIR: security/openssh-portable

2006-08-09 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
John E Hein wrote: Gábor Kövesdán wrote at 01:29 +0200 on Aug 10, 2006: > John E Hein wrote: > > John E Hein wrote at 16:31 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006: > > > Now that ports/Mk does the right thing for DESTDIR (thanks to Gábor), > > > here's a patch th

Re: support for DESTDIR: security/openssh-portable

2006-08-09 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
John E Hein wrote: John E Hein wrote at 16:31 -0600 on Aug 9, 2006: > Now that ports/Mk does the right thing for DESTDIR (thanks to Gábor), > here's a patch that supports DESTDIR properly for > security/openssh-portable: > [snip] > @@ -171,29 +171,33 @@ post-extract: > post-patch: >

Re: HEADS-UP: DESTDIR support committed to Mk/

2006-08-05 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Andrey Chernov wrote: On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 10:49:11AM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote: Edwin Groothuis wrote: On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 06:08:09PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote: I am pleased to announce, that portmgr committed my patch for ports infrastructure DESTDIR support today

Re: HEADS-UP: DESTDIR support committed to Mk/

2006-08-05 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Edwin Groothuis wrote: On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 06:08:09PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote: I am pleased to announce, that portmgr committed my patch for ports infrastructure DESTDIR support today. Note that this support is only for the infrastructure, ports may or may not respect the DESTDIR mac

HEADS-UP: DESTDIR support committed to Mk/

2006-08-04 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Hi, I am pleased to announce, that portmgr committed my patch for ports infrastructure DESTDIR support today. Note that this support is only for the infrastructure, ports may or may not respect the DESTDIR macro, so you should use this with care. Also note, that we only tested this patchset w

Re: graphics/png - CC

2006-07-29 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Gábor Kövesdán wrote: [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Andrey Chernov wrote: On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:59:19PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:27:08 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: graphics/png - CC

2006-07-29 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Andrey Chernov wrote: On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:59:19PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:27:08 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrey Chernov wrote: On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger

Re: graphics/png - CC

2006-07-29 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Andrey Chernov wrote: On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 03:54:44PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: It will be hack for reason unknown, I prefer to avoid that. It is not a hack and it is known reason that you need to honor CC. It is not a reason, it is a goal. The reason is the bug true na

Re: shoutcase on current?

2006-07-13 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
will /usr/ports/audio/linux-shoutcast run on -current? randy Probably, yes, since it doesn't depend on the FreeBSD version itself, just on the linux emulation layer. Anyway, the native port, audio/shoutcast should also run on -current with misc/compat5x installed. Cheers, Gabor