s
> in the tmpfs earn the end of the builder's activity.
> (This is a amd64 context with 128 GiBytes of RAM and
> 192 GiBytes of swapping/paging space.)
>
> ===
> Mark Millard
> marklmi at yahoo.com
> ( dsl-only.net went
> away in early 2018-Mar)
>
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t; *** Error code 1
I suspect somewhere ${REINPLACE_CMD} or ${SED} or
${FRAMEWORK_REINPLACE_CMD} is misspelled or not set.
Perhaps your overlay is outdated and one of these is not set.
You could try this in your poudriere.conf to get more debugging (untested):
PORT_FLAGS="-dlx"
want
to add such a feature to Poudriere as well eventually.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
s as
well.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
below.]
This and the -S issue should both be fixed in
poudriere-devel-3.2.99.20171204_1
I will release it to 3.2.3 later today. Please let me know if it works
for you.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[ "${JAILMNT}" = "/" ] && \
> err 1 "Cannot use / for -M"
> fi
> . . .
> SRC_BASE="${JAILMNT}/usr/src"
>
> case ${METHOD} in
> . . .
> null)
> JAILFS=none
> FCT=
> ;;
> esac
>
> if [ "${JAILFS}" != "none" ]; then
> [ -d "${JAILMNT}" ] && \
> err 1 "Directory ${JAILMNT} already exists"
> fi
>
> createfs ${JAILNAME} ${JAILMNT} ${JAILFS:-none}
> . . .
>
>
>
> ===
> Mark Millard
> markmi at dsl-only.net
>
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/15/2017 11:57 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 15.11.2017 22:27, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>>> % make WRKDIRPREFIX='' extract
>>> make[1]: don't know how to make
>>> /usr/home/lev/FreeBSD/ports/devel/subversion/work/.extract_done.subversion._usr_
On 11/15/2017 11:08 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 15.11.2017 21:07, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>> First, using "WRKDIRPREFIX=''" doesn't seem like a "supported feature".
>> If there's docs or a specific commit to support such a thing then
/root/svn/ports/devel/subversion/work
Given it is just prepended onto WRKDIR I see no reason it would be
different with the FLAVORS work; the code should just work.
> ./bsd.port.mk:# WRKDIRPREFIX- The place to root the temporary working
> directory
> ./bsd.port.mk:# Default:
> ${WRKDIRPREFIX}${.CURDIR}/work
> ./bsd.port.mk:WRKDIR?= ${WRKDIRPREFIX}${.CURDIR}/${_WRKDIR}
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ocumentation or provide an example.
>
> Thanks
It's just a file, nothing too special needed.
${MKDIR} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/etc/periodic/daily
${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/40.blah ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/etc/periodic/daily/
pkg-plist:
etc/periodic/daily/40.blah
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewe
efore the
'mkdir -p' it does which causes bulk to get an empty option set on the
next run.
It's bitten quite a few people already, probably 6+ that I know of. I
am tempted to just revert it but I think it is useful for some which is
why I'll go the interactive route (when in a TTY).
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s own source after r325001.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
need a source checkout matching your current system there and having
already done a 'make buildworld' for it.
This is a bug in the native-xtools build that poudriere is working
around until it is fixed.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 5/26/2017 8:20 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> For those running FreeBSD head, the ABI was majorly changed in r318736
> for 64-bit inodes. This change was *backwards compatible* but not
> *forward compatible*. This is normal and expected.
>
> For Pkg users:
>
> You are ad
ld less often and only when someone updates __FreeBSD_version.
This is more proper and we should strive to update this only as needed
to rebuild things.
2. Fix -m src= *not* rebuilding packages after the recent ABI breakage.
If your jail uses -m src= I recommend forcifully doing a bulk -c
timestamp-exit-on-eof.diff
>
> I believe I created the poudriere setup with 3.1.14 or maybe even
> 3.1.13. (It was only created within the last couple weeks.)
>
> If more information is needed to diagnose this, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Naram Qashat
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
lementation, that pretty much works with your patches as well. I am
working to resolve the DEPENDS_ARGS bug first, which also fixes allowing
the same ORIGIN into the queue multiple times. Once that is done, then
FLAVORS can be supported in Poudriere.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
32891) and
> half of another (433120) because the newest snapshot of the pkgs was
> replaced half way through my process of downloading a large set of packages.
Yup it is an annoying issue. https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/988
is the tracking bug for it. Ideas and patches we
On 2/14/2017 2:58 PM, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> On 14 Feb 2017, at 22:16, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> On 2/14/2017 12:50 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=433827
>> I think that commit message combined with
>&g
sion=433856
This commit may have been an error and is being discussed.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 1/13/17 1:31 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 12/27/16 9:39 PM, sor...@cydem.org wrote:
>>
>> Howdy!
>>
>> Could someone update the SCTP patch for ports/security/openssh-portable?
>> Fixed version attached (very basic changes: account for "oIdentityAgent
ile
> the protocol itself is quite nice and useful.
>
> SHA256 (openssh-7.3_p1-sctp.patch.gz) =
> 0bfa4769db0982e81ac808e7bfb6904a86a10a251735f8b81f4e6a1430cd9b20
> SIZE (openssh-7.3_p1-sctp.patch.gz) = 8507
>
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t;> $ mount | grep fd
>> fdescfs on /dev/fd (fdescfs)
>> fdescfs on /poudriere/data/.m/12amd64-default/01/dev/fd (fdescfs)
>> fdescfs on /poudriere/data/.m/12amd64-default/05/dev/fd (fdescfs)
>> fdescfs on /poudriere/data/.m/12amd64-default/03/dev/fd (fdescfs)
>> fdescfs on /poudriere/data/.m/12amd64-default/02/dev/fd (fdescfs)
>> fdescfs on /poudriere/data/.m/12amd64-default/04/dev/fd (fdescfs)
>>
>> However, java/openjdk8 still fails to build with bulk, with the same
>> error.
>
> Well, it may not be related to fdescfs being, or not, there, then ;-)
>
> I openned https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/issues/416 for the
> problem of procfs/fdescfs not being there when running testport.
>
Thanks, will fix!
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
usr/ports and I hooked
> it into poudrire by doing something like:
> poudriere ports -c -p default -F -M /usr/ports
>
This is a separate bug.
> IMHO, if the ports tree was not created by poudriere, then -k should be
> the default when deleting it.
>
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t.
>
> Thanks,
> Russell
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 6/27/2016 1:48 PM, Jan Beich wrote:
> Bryan Drewery writes:
>
>> On 6/26/16 5:00 AM, Jan Beich wrote:
>>
>>> pkg-fall...@freebsd.org writes:
>>>
>>>> Ident: $FreeBSD: head/multimedia/vapoursynth/Makefile 415615
>>>> 20
rk was doing the wrong thing.
net/tiny-network-utilities is another example where this is a problem
and PACKAGE_BUILDING was used to set IGNORE to avoid the problem for now.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
sr/local/bin/ccache' not found.
Your poudriere is too old. This is due to the removal of ${PORTSDIR} in
dependencies. We put that off for several months (I think 6+) after the
Poudriere fix came out for it.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
;
> Personally, I'd consider this a bug, but am unsure how best to file a PR for
> this?
>
It's pretty much the same as https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/issues/333
It's there for later.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
___
free
udriere.conf. But this seems to be not the correct
> way to do so, since MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX is supposed to be set in the
> environment.
>
> What am I missing here?
The poudriere command clears the environment except for PATH and TERM.
A 10-stable-amd64-poudriere.conf with export MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX
at the wrong time. It may
even be during the dependency phase. Typically if a port is executing
something it is specifically made to ignore any errors doing so and use
a fallback value. I've seen it forever and haven't worried too much
about it.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signatu
On 2/10/2016 5:33 AM, John Marino wrote:
>> I'm asking myself how to manage the code. Should i create a new GitHub
>> repository? Fork the existing from freebsd/portmaster? How to handle the
>> LOCAL Master-Site?
>
>
> Talk to Bryan Drewery.
>
> "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/5/15 1:09 AM, Jan Beich wrote:
> Bryan Drewery writes:
>
>> On 11/24/2015 8:00 PM, Euan Thoms wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:15 SGT, Jan Beich
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 12/4/2015 5:01 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 11/24/2015 8:00 PM, Euan Thoms wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:15 SGT, Jan Beich
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "Euan Thoms" writes:
>>>
>>>> do-build:
>>>&g
KEVARS does not impact the variable
literally named 'MAKEFLAGS'. It should only be impacting these:
# make -V _EXPORTED_VARS
ARCH OPSYS _OSRELEASE OSREL OSVERSION _PKG_CHECKED HAVE_COMPAT_IA32_KERN
_SMP_CPUS CONFIGURE_MAX_CMD_LEN
Which port was this? Which release are you running (real question is
whether it was fmake or bmake)?
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
is more recent.
>>
>> Thanks for the explanation!
I should probably tweak the message and logic a bit to be less scary and
normal. It is mostly for people trying to build head packages from a 10
kernel which is easily not supported and usually results in obscure
failures like
On 1/22/2015 6:34 PM, Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <54c18193.1000...@freebsd.org>, Bryan Drewery writes:
>> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
>> --NvIRPgp2pVcRmjhwtM9TwAvH1900GK90a
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>>
On 11/12/2015 10:21 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 12.11.2015 21:07, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>>> But this one isn't
>>>
>>> ===> License APACHE20 accepted by the user ===> Found saved
>>> configuration for subversion-1.9.2 Error a dependen
On 11/12/2015 5:00 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 09.11.2015 21:52, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>
>> This and the perl one are fixed after r401162.
>
> But this one isn't
>
> ===> License APACHE20 accepted by the user
> ===> Found saved configuration
tarters, we want to see what we can accomplish with ports.
I'm too busy to help on this project at the time, but if you come across
any hooks that would be beneficial please let me know and I'll add them
into Poudriere.
https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/wiki/hooks
--
Regard
: using hyphen in PORTNAME. consider using PKGNAMEPREFIX and/or
> PKGNAMESUFFIX.
> WARN:
> /usr/home/lev/FreeBSD/ports/devel/gcc-arm-embedded/files/patch-src--gcc--gcc--config--arm--arm.h:
> patch was not generated using ``make makepatch''. It is recommended to use
> ``make makepatch'' when you need to [re-]generate a patch to ensure proper
> patch format.
> 0 fatal errors and 5 warnings found.
>>
>
>
This and the perl one are fixed after r401162.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/29/15 8:58 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Bryan Drewery wrote on 10/29/2015 16:27:
>> On 10/29/15 6:27 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>>> I usually use poudriere for larger set of packages (about 500) so this
>>> problem was hidden to me but now I needed just mini
[00:00:02] >> Computing deps for devel/py-pip
> [00:00:02] >> Computing deps for devel/py-setuptools27
> [00:00:03] >> Computing deps for lang/python27
> [00:00:03] >> Computing deps for ports-mgmt/pkg
> [00:00:03] >> Computing deps for devel/libffi
> [00:00:03] >> Computing deps for print/indexinfo
> [00:00:03] >> Computing deps for devel/pkgconf
> [00:00:03] >> pkg package missing, skipping sanity
> [00:00:03] >> Skipping incremental rebuild and repository sanity checks
> [00:00:03] >> Cleaning the build queue
> [00:00:03] >> Recording filesystem state for prepkg... done
> [00:00:06] >> Building 8 packages using 2 builders
> [00:00:06] >> Starting/Cloning builders
> [00:00:07] >> Hit CTRL+t at any time to see build progress and stats
> ..
> ..
> Packing files for repository: 100%
> [00:06:45] >> Committing packages to repository
> [00:06:45] >> Removing old packages
> [00:06:45] >> Built ports: ports-mgmt/pkg print/indexinfo
> devel/pkgconf devel/libffi lang/python27 devel/py-setuptools27
> devel/py-virtualenv devel/py-pip
> [10_2_amd64-default-eprofi] [2015-10-28_20h53m46s] [committing:] Queued:
> 8 Built: 8 Failed: 0 Skipped: 0 Ignored: 0 Tobuild: 0 Time: 00:06:44
> [00:06:45] >> Logs:
> /vol0/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/10_2_amd64-default-eprofi/2015-10-28_20h53m46s
>
> [00:06:45] >> Cleaning up
> 10_2_amd64-default-eprofi: removed
> 10_2_amd64-default-eprofi-n: removed
> [00:06:45] >> Umounting file systems
>
> Usr: 413.901s Krnl: 103.705s Totl: 6:45.55s CPU: 127.6% swppd: 0
> I/O: 2458+42297
>
>
> Should I provide anything more to track this problem?
>
> Miroslav Lachman
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ts/CHANGES file. It is supposed to
get news about new framework changes.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
previous build.
Adding a 'poudriere kill' command is on the todo list.
>
> I'm leaving the system untouched for now so that I can try out any
> suggestions for cleanup and restart.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
sten
If you're on 10+ you can use .info, otherwise .warning on older make.
.info your ${msg} goes ${here}
.if defined(whatever)
.info whatever is defined as: ${whatever}
.endif
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
vecot2-2.2.19, but the 2015Q4 branch only has
> dovecot2-2.2.18.
No, /latest has 2.2.19 which tracks head. /quartery has 2.2.18 which
tracks the quarterly branch.
If you're seeing a 2.2.18 in a /latest directory please be specific for
which arch/release.
They are built every 2 days currentl
to
portmaster reparsing it.
Portupgrade used to be frowned on for having a 2nd db for tracking
installing ports, but it no longer does. It just queries the pkg db with
'pkg query' now [as referenced by OP].
Portupgrade's biggest problem is still with ruby upgrades.
I could go on, but
MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION, she would have
> deployed a non-default configuration a long time ago. ;)
>
I'm more bothered that the minimal version was immediately bumped on a
.0 release. The last time the minimal version was bumped was hard
enough, and the issue with portmaster has been kno
's because a fix has been committed to ports tree.
>
devel/libvirt was affected by this too.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ools/snapshot.rb:118:in
> `create_many'
> from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.1/zfstools.rb:152:in
> `do_new_snapshots'
> from /usr/local/sbin/zfs-auto-snapshot:68:in `'
>
> on every run.
>
Sorry about this. 0.3.5 fixed this. It was
ges will be necessary to support upcoming VARIANTS (formerly
> known as FLAVOURS) and sub packages.
>
> This first step would allow you to step into the code of those tools before
> the
> having to deal with more intrusive changes :)
>
I have not forgotten about this. I pla
l/client.mc
> SENDMAIL_ADDITIONAL_MC= /etc/mail/bastion.mc
> /etc/mail/catwhisker.org.mc
> +PORTSDIR=/usr/ports
> freebeast(10.2-S)[7]
>
> Yeah: appending an explicit "PORTSDIR=/usr/ports" makes thinigs work
> again.
I'm fixing this in portmaster and relea
ies (hear
>>> provides/requires) and VARIANTS/FLAVORS and subpackages.
>>>
>>> If one cares about those tools, please make them work without ${PORTSDIR}
>>> information.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bapt
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Are those features already present somehow in ports?
>>
>> The first thing I see is a failure because calling commands
>> such as "make build-depends-list" in port directories in which I
>> removed ${PORTSDIR} from LIB_DEPENDS failing.
>>
> No not yet because we are writing for portmaster/portupgrade to handle that to
> commit them. How ever I can provide a patch so anyone willing to work on that
> will be able to test.
>
Please
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 7/28/15 10:43 PM, David Naylor wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 17:08:37 Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>> On 7/28/15 11:46 AM, David Naylor wrote:
>
>>> Why would the shared library be found when using a relative
>>>
On 7/28/15 11:46 AM, David Naylor wrote:
> Why would the shared library be found when using a relative path but not
> when using an absolute path? Is this a bug in FreeBSD?
What is the output for readelf?
readelf -d `which pypy`|grep -i libr
--
Regards,
Bryan D
,
Bryan Drewery
on behalf of portmgr@
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
a hospital bed at the time, with various
> electrodes and tubes attached to me, very little interest in the world,
> and my server switched off...
>
I'm not kidding when I say you should just uninstall all packages,
upgrade the base system/kernel and then reinstall packages from scr
2();
The module is only providing 512 and 1024 but not 2048 and 3072 symbols.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 5/28/2015 6:52 PM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:36:24AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 5/27/2015 11:09 PM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
>>> So, I'm installing a bunch of stuff in a chrooted staging area built
>>> from source. I've got p
On 5/28/2015 12:16 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015, at 11:47, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>
>> I think the VUXML database needs to be simpler to contribute to. Only a
>> handful of committers feel comfortable touching the file.
>
> We could use a ve
On 5/28/2015 11:47 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 5/27/2015 12:40 PM, Roger Marquis wrote:
...
> This php one came up in the week and I almost
> "just fixed it", but doing those things burns me out as I have my own
> priorities.
Once of which is maintaining the package bu
o familiar with where it is going.
As for maintainers tracking upstream mailing lists, this is hard. I'm
subscribed to a lot of lists and can't keep up with all of the traffic.
The RedHat security team and reporting is very impressive. Don't forget
that they are a funded company though. Perhaps the FreeBSD Foundation
needs to fund a fulltime security officer that is devoted to both Ports
and Src. Just the Ports piece is easily a fulltime job.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I've never gotten to use ZFS
> to build brand new installations from scratch before. I've probably
> missed something somewhere.
>
> And thanks for any help!
>
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
im or opensmtp. All of which are actively maintained.
Cheers,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hat others have employed is to just check all of
this out on freefall and make your own tarball. Then put that in your
~/public_distfiles and serve it in the port as MASTER_SITES= LOCAL/jonathan.
Or ask the upstream to do an actual release of their own with a real
tarball rather than asking people to use git.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
er to submit vuxml updates? Many contributors,
and committers, feel the file is not easy to contribute to.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ist
> ./audio/mpdcon/pkg-plist
> ./deskutils/gnustep-notebook/pkg-plist
> ./deskutils/gworkspace/pkg-plist
> ./deskutils/gworkspace-gwmetadata/pkg-plist
> ./deskutils/displaycalibrator/pkg-plist
> ./deskutils/hamster-applet/pkg-plist
> ./deskutils/simpleagenda/pkg-plist
> ./deskutils/cartotheque/pkg-plist
> ./deskutils/systempreferences/pkg-plist
> ./textproc/easydiff/pkg-plist
> ./textproc/popup/pkg-plist
> ./textproc/scss/pkg-plist
> ./textproc/linux-f10-aspell/pkg-plist
> ./textproc/linux-c6-aspell/pkg-plist
> ./news/fidogate/pkg-plist
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
config.log in these cases
though, or the framework could auto cat(1) it when PACKAGE_BUILDING is set.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
there is not need to use it if
> directories are combined.
> Because now I don't have a way to store options in
> 8_4_amd64-projectA-options directory by one "poudriere options" command.
>
> Or am I doing something wrong?
>
> Should I use symlinks from projectA-options to
> 8_4_amd64-projectA-options for each port directory to share options
> between these two build sets? Or copy them from common directory
> (projectA-options) to the other (8_4_amd64-projectA-options)?
> What is the best way to maintain this kind of configuration?
>
> Thank you in advance and thanks for poudriere - really nice tool for
> port builds!
>
> Miroslav Lachman
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
http://beefy4.isc.freebsd.org/data/93amd64-quarterly/384860/logs/chromium-42.0.2311.90.log
No chromium package will be provided while this persists.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rsion.
>
> thanks
> -kim
cd /usr/ports/net/samba41
make maintainer
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
cause it's already fixed!
Cheers,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ding and see?
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
is for ncurses basically USES=ncurses will die and ncurses will just
> become a regular LIB_DEPENDS
>
> When it becomes fun is that now all ports will have to really respect
> LDFLAGS...
>
> I already found a couple of bad boys in that area.
>
> btw that should also solve some issues with python and its ncurses module.
>
Peter has pointed out that OpenSSL has symbol versioning that we are not
using. Enabling this in base may help the conflict issue here. Even if
we force all ports to use ports OpenSSL we run into the problem you
describe of loading in the base OpenSSL when linking some libraries. The
versioning may avoid that. Of course that would only solve for
11.0/10.2/9.4 and not current releases.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tps constraints feature to fail, which
>is why I haven't updated the net/openntpd yet.
>
Are you mixing ports and packages?
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
oudriere/jails/101amd64/
>
>
> The problem probably only occurs in specific configurations. Otherwise,
> I would have expected several reports by now.
>
> # diff poudriere.conf.sample poudriere.conf | grep \>
>> NO_ZFS=yes
>> USE_TMPFS=all
>> CHECK_CHANGED_DEPS=yes
>> PARALLEL_JOBS=1
>> ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes
3.1.3 is now out which fixes this. Sorry about that.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
oudriere/jails/101amd64/
>
>
> The problem probably only occurs in specific configurations. Otherwise,
> I would have expected several reports by now.
>
> # diff poudriere.conf.sample poudriere.conf | grep \>
>> NO_ZFS=yes
>> USE_TMPFS=all
>> CHECK_CHANGED_DEPS=yes
>> PARALLEL_JOBS=1
>> ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes
I'll get a fix out later today or tomorrow.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
d look
> into this. Otherwise, massively faulty package repositories are produces.
>
> Yuri
I've wanted this for a long time. I think we should just do it.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 4/1/2015 2:13 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 1 Apr, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 4/1/2015 1:54 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> I'm working on a couple of new ports where I'm using fetching the
>>> distfiles from github. One quirk is that the tags start with a
the distfile gets named
> ${GH_ACCOUNT}-${GH_PROJECT}-${PORTVERSION}-tags-v${PORTVERSION}_GH0.tar.gz.
> This seems to be excessively verbose, but safer.
>
> Thoughts?
>
Can you please be more specific on what port this is and possibly
provide a patch?
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.
>
> Could I notify build cluster (poudrere?) that this package takes a
> lot of time without output?
>
Well, consider the user's perspective too. "Is anything actually happening?"
Can you modify it to produce output?
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nd the local changes are just added on top of those.
>
> Cheers
> Marcus
>
Agreed. The local patches are intended to avoid touching the port. If
they are not last then you may have to go tweaking some of the other
ports patches to fix your own.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 3/23/2015 11:44 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 3/23/2015 11:39 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 3/22/2015 5:28 AM, Ben Woods wrote:
>>> My poudriere is acting funny now, and I'm not sure if it's related. It
>>> keeps deleting xorg-fonts-truetype because the
On 3/23/2015 11:39 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 3/22/2015 5:28 AM, Ben Woods wrote:
>> My poudriere is acting funny now, and I'm not sure if it's related. It
>> keeps deleting xorg-fonts-truetype because there is a new dependency
>> (x11-fonts/dejavu), and then ha
ell as making them working for
>> non-x11
>>> world (wayland for example)
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Bapt
>>
>>
>> Done in r381876 please report me all possible issue, I have done quite a
>> lot of
>> testing but I cannot test everything.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bapt
>>
>
>
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
;s some craziness. Try it out please.
https://people.freebsd.org/~bdrewery/patches/ports-mgmt-portell-gist.diff
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-f %%ETCSSH%%/ssh_host_dsa_key -a \
-f %%ETCSSH%%/ssh_host_rsa_key -a \
-f %%ETCSSH%%/ssh_host_ecdsa_key -a \
-f %%ETCSSH%%/ssh_host_ed25519_key ]; then
return 0
Thank you.
Regards,
Bretislav Kubesa
Sorry about this. It should be fixed now
dn’t find it). I went through the porters manual and didn’t find anything
> on how to approve a patch. How do I do that?
>
In bugzilla there is a maintainer feedback dropdown. You can change it
to a '+' and also leave a comment saying approved.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signat
>
>
> I would be happy to send you more detailed configurations docs.
>
>
>
> For now, I have had to drop tls support.
>
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ime of 60+ minutes?
Is pkg the same version in the jail as your host? It may be a recent pkg
create regression.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Run the entire build in memory, including builder jails.
> USE_TMPFS=all
>
Why do people pick MFS over TMPFS? I've found MFS/UFS significantly
slower than TMPFS on FreeBSD 10+.
I'm very inclined to remove MFS support from Poudriere as it is far less
supported as TMPFS and not tested well.
I suspect the reason is due to size constraint not being supported in
the past. TMPFS_LIMIT can be used just as MFSSIZE can be.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 1/22/2015 4:49 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
> And in general, the ports tree is a single snapshot. It's only supported
> to build a port using the exact Mk/ it was checked-in as.
For the record, I don't like this at all. It's one of my biggest gripes
about the ports fram
e.
The bigger picture changes, such as sub-packages, flavors and flexible
dependencies, are not here yet. Those changes will most definitely not
be forward-compat once they go in. Ports written after those won't work
with older framework. We're not quite there yet though.
And in gener
On 1/14/2015 2:34 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
> On 13.01.2015 22:04, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 1/9/2015 5:18 AM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
>>> [ 3%] mo-update [wesnoth-dw-ar]: Creating mo file.
>>> /usr/bin/ld: g: invalid DSO for symbol
>>> `_ZN5boost6s
; c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see
> invocation)
> --- cutter ---
Usually this means -lboost_system is missing from the linker line.
Recent binutils in recent FreeBSD head has been patched to be more clear
about it.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
De
d
>> problems.
>
> I'll try this option now and would appreciate if you could describe
> the problems you had with it. Details help.
>
This option was added for an intent that never panned out. I should
remove it. It's dangerous and will create a broken reposi
On 1/6/2015 5:59 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 1/4/2015 6:27 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> Is there a plan to update the devel/ccache port? The new version has
>>> improved clang support.
>>
>> If you can provide a patch that update
ORTNAME}/ \
GH
You can use whatever order you wish.
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
1 - 100 of 532 matches
Mail list logo
