___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
2010/9/22 David Wolfskill :
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:52:02PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>
>> > There is no utmpx.h on 8.1-RELEASE.
>> >
>>
>> Then it's there because I downgraded from -STABLE, then I should
>> remove it safely ?
>
> When I do a source upgrade (which I do way more freque
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: libaacplus-1.0.5: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/autoconf262
Committers on the hook:
ade amdmi3 pgollucci
Most recent CVS update was:
U LEGAL
U MOVED
U astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced/Makefile
Can a few folks who have reported failures with net/samba* since the update of
autoconf to 2.67 please mail me (not the list) the output from the following
commands:
cd /usr/ports/net/
make showconfig
make configure
and I can probably put a hack in place until 6.x goes E
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:29:50PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
> > 21.09.2010 12:05, David Southwell написав(ла):
> > >Problem is opal does not compile due to failure which was in
> >
> > >original posting:
> > According to:
> >
> > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-latest-logs/opal-2
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:04:08 +0200
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm using a 7.2/amd386 (soon to be 7.3) as PDC with Samba 3.0.37.
> Since I have to add a Windows 7 machine, I need to upgrade to 3.4.x.
>
> Is this as simple as removing the port and installing the new one?
>
> I have no
Hello.
I'm using a 7.2/amd386 (soon to be 7.3) as PDC with Samba 3.0.37.
Since I have to add a Windows 7 machine, I need to upgrade to 3.4.x.
Is this as simple as removing the port and installing the new one?
I have no BDC, I'm not using LDAP or WinBind or anything fancy.
I do use pam_smb thoug
No, never looked at wxgtk28 port and I understand it would be non trivial to
split it. Building it as part of amule would be better.
But I am not here to ask you to do that, just suggesting what might be
useful to people wishing to use amule on servers. On the other hand it is
true that compiling
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
On 23.09.2010 00:01, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
Both versions also got this problem:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/149411
It is something wrong with sysutils/fusefs-kmod on 8.x
Hrm .. so is this a general FUSeFS problem? Or just a s
On 23.09.2010 02:08, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
On 23.09.2010 00:01, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
Both versions also got this problem:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/149411
It is something wrong with sysutils/fusefs-kmod on 8.x
Hrm .. so is
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:52:02PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
>
> > There is no utmpx.h on 8.1-RELEASE.
> >
>
> Then it's there because I downgraded from -STABLE, then I should
> remove it safely ?
When I do a source upgrade (which I do way more frequently than is
sane), I augment the inst
On 22/09/2010 16:29:46, Tim Kellers wrote:
> The message while portupgrading bugzilla:
>
> "bugzilla-3.6.2_1 depends on package: p5-DBD-mysql>=2.9003 - not found
> Verifying reinstall for p5-DBD-mysql>=2.9003 in
> /usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql
>
> p5-DBD-mysql-4.017 conflicts with installed
2010/9/22 Anonymous :
> David DEMELIER writes:
>
>> I have them in /usr/include/utmpx.h
>>
>> At configure stage :
>>
>> checking utmpx.h usability... yes
>> checking utmpx.h presence... yes
>> checking for utmpx.h... yes
>>
>> In config.log there is not something strange but if you want to check
On 23.09.2010 00:01, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
(and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
When I go to the website of the project Fuse
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse/ , there is a more recent
version fuse-2.
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Alexandre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
> http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
> (and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
> When I go to the website of the project Fuse
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse/ , there i
22.09.2010 18:06, Karl Pielorz пишет:
Hi,
I've got the port of mbuffer (/usr/ports/misc/mbuffer) installed on a
number of machines (amd64/FreeBSD 6.4-S, 7.2-S and 8.1-R) - but it seems
to have issues...
Firstly - any attempt to use the 'network' options of it, fail miserably
(this is where mbu
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:56:27 +0600
Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
> On 22.09.2010 22:24, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>
> >> I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
> >> http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
> >> (and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
> >> When I go to the website of the project
On 22.09.2010 22:24, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
(and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
When I go to the website of the project Fuse
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse/ , there is a more recent version
fuse-2.
David DEMELIER writes:
> I have them in /usr/include/utmpx.h
>
> At configure stage :
>
> checking utmpx.h usability... yes
> checking utmpx.h presence... yes
> checking for utmpx.h... yes
>
> In config.log there is not something strange but if you want to check
> it I attached it.
>
> By the way
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:07:17 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Janne Snabb wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > > One issue with either Git or Mercurial is that they are GPL.
> > > AFAIK FreeBSD prefers to avoid GPL in the base or in critical
> > > widely-used in
2010/9/22 Anonymous :
> David DEMELIER writes:
>
>> sessreg.o(.text+0xfa): In function `UtmpxIdOpen':
>> : undefined reference to `setutxent'
>> sessreg.o(.text+0x101): In function `UtmpxIdOpen':
>> : undefined reference to `getutxent'
>> sessreg.o(.text+0x12b): In function `UtmpxIdOpen':
>> : und
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:33:53 +0200
Alexandre wrote:
> I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
> http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
> (and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
> When I go to the website of the project Fuse
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse/ , there is a more recen
The message while portupgrading bugzilla:
"bugzilla-3.6.2_1 depends on package: p5-DBD-mysql>=2.9003 - not found
Verifying reinstall for p5-DBD-mysql>=2.9003 in
/usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql
p5-DBD-mysql-4.017 conflicts with installed package(s):
p5-DBD-mysql50-4.017
They install files i
Paolo Bormida writes:
> My goal is not to build the gui version, just amuled and amulecmd,
> and I think this can be done in amule calling configure like
> described in this howto http://wiki.amule.org/index.php/
> HowTo_Compile_aMuled
Have you looked at x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 port? You'd need to
Of course this would be useful to those who do wish not to install/start X
on a server, whether it be a i386/amd64 or a sparc64 or other architectures
that does not have a graphic card on the server (an headless machine) .
In this case would be useless to do a very long build of X11 and amule gui,
Double answer:
The functions you see in amulecmd should be in wxbase and wx is not a
problem.
My goal is not to build the gui version, just amuled and amulecmd, and I
think this can be done in amule calling configure like described in this
howto http://wiki.amule.org/index.php/HowTo_Compile_aMule
David DEMELIER writes:
> sessreg.o(.text+0xfa): In function `UtmpxIdOpen':
> : undefined reference to `setutxent'
> sessreg.o(.text+0x101): In function `UtmpxIdOpen':
> : undefined reference to `getutxent'
> sessreg.o(.text+0x12b): In function `UtmpxIdOpen':
> : undefined reference to `endutxent'
Hello,
Fetched ports today :
===> Building for sessreg-1.0.5_1
/usr/bin/make all-am
cc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Wpointer-arith
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
-Wnested-externs -fno-strict-aliasing -Wbad-function-cast -Wformat=2
-Wold-style-defini
Hi,
I've got the port of mbuffer (/usr/ports/misc/mbuffer) installed on a
number of machines (amd64/FreeBSD 6.4-S, 7.2-S and 8.1-R) - but it seems to
have issues...
Firstly - any attempt to use the 'network' options of it, fail miserably
(this is where mbuffer sends the data via tcp, instea
Hi,
I want to use Fuse-SSHFS
http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/but the port is old
(and it got a Sanity Test Failure).
When I go to the website of the project Fuse
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fuse/ , there is a more recent version
fuse-2.8.4.tar.gz and available (?) for FreeBSD.
Anonymous writes:
> Paolo Bormida writes:
>
>> Can the new knobs be used to do a gui-less build of amule?
>
> No, even without --disable-monolithic amule would still require WX.
^^^
Typo: without -> with.
Perhaps, I misinterpreted your question and you just don't want to build
`a
Paolo Bormida writes:
> Can the new knobs be used to do a gui-less build of amule?
No, even without --disable-monolithic amule would still require WX.
$ readelf -d $(which amulecmd) | fgrep wx
0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library:
[libwx_baseu_net-2.8.so.0]
0x
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:29:50PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
> 21.09.2010 12:05, David Southwell написав(ла):
> >Problem is opal does not compile due to failure which was in
> >original posting:
> According to:
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-latest-logs/opal-2.2.11_2.log.bz2
>
Dmitry Marakasov writes:
> * Anonymous (swel...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Are such PITA to install games desired in the ports tree, anyway?
>
> I think in this case -data port is not needed. Sources should be
> packaged and put somewhere, and the game should show a pkg-message
> with instructions on
Nice to know that amule will get more frequent updates, and the new knobs
are great as well, but isn't risky to use snapshots for a port? Are there
any policies about what to base a port upon?
And yes, you are correct about the availability of the sparc64 packages.
Can the new knobs be used to do
Anonymous writes:
> Besides, I plan to rename the port to plain `amule' with the next update
> in order to remove last bit of confusion, i.e. `2' version suffix in
> port directory name and in LATEST_LINK.
Pass me pointyhat for not doing it when the port switched to use snapshots.
__
Paolo Bormida writes:
> Does amule2 port switched from a stable 2.2.5 release to a daily
> snapshot?
Yes, snapshots are gonna be used unless there are more frequent releases
upstream. You can find the history of changes on freshports.
http://www.freshports.org/net-p2p/amule2
The package name
Smells like Debian.
Smells like Slashdot.
I give up.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
>
>> Given the amount of GPL'd software in the base system, why are we
>> already fighting over licensing? What is it with the
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:42:37 +0200, Paolo Bormida wrote
> To: ganael.laplan...@martymac.org
Hi Paolo,
(this is a re-post of my previous, private answer)
I am sorry but I am no more the maintainer of aMule. You should get in touch
with swel...@gmail.com, who is the new maintainer.
> Sorry to bo
Sorry, but I think I should forward this to you as well.
Paolo Bormida
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paolo Bormida
Date: 2010/9/22
Subject: Question about amule port version
To: ganael.laplan...@martymac.org
Sorry to bother you, but I think I understood the problem I described
22.09.2010, 14:11, "Adam Vande More" :
> BSD license
> has a particular advantage in embedded/black box systems, so not polluting
> base with more viral licensing is pretty important to project as whole I
> think.
Do embedded systems really need to use ports tree? I guess no, or only during
init
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> Given the amount of GPL'd software in the base system, why are we
> already fighting over licensing? What is it with the open-source world
> and obsessing with licensing? It should be up for discussion after
> alternatives have been deter
Regards,
After update from autoconf-2.62 to 2.67, I can't install samba3x ports
on FBSD6 machines, compilation failed with:
(I've tried other versions of samba3/31/32/33/34, problem is the same.
Downgrade of autoconf to version 2.62 helped. Only FBSD6 is affected,
FBSD7 works fine..)
(Problem
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 03:50:37AM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:27 AM, wrote:
>
> > As I understand it, what is being suggested is the adoption of a
> > new code base for a significant piece of infrastructure. I think
> > the proposal is at less risk of being summari
> This dvcs is BSD licensed:
IMHO, if it's worth to change VCS, it would be much wiser to use well-known one
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:27 AM, wrote:
> As I understand it, what is being suggested is the adoption of a
> new code base for a significant piece of infrastructure. I think
> the proposal is at less risk of being summarily rejected if it can
> viably be based on BSD-licensed code rather than on
Hi Wesley,
I've been playing with DHCPv6 and in doing so, ran into an apparent
problem with the net/isc-dhcp41-client port.
It currently overwrites the FreeBSD client script distributed by ISC
with a custom script "client::scripts::freebsd" which lives in the
net/isc-dhcp41-server port's files di
jhell wrote:
> Feel free to correct me if I am wrong but it is not going to
> matter much to what extent a license has to do with this besides
> ease of mind maybe. We would not be using the source for the VCS
> in a repo that holds the source that is being distributed and
> none of the containe
48 matches
Mail list logo
