in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote
Peter Jeremy thusly...
>
> On 2007-May-19 15:10:07 -0700, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >
> >> I presume there will be followup commits at some stage to fix
> >> src/etc/defaults/rc.conf src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf and
>
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat, 19 May 2007 23:48:52
-0500):
> On my system, the program pkg_version can double its speed simply by
> replacing "make -V PKGNAME" by "make BEFOREPORTMK=yes -V PKGNAME" in
> src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/version. Basically what it does is to
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-May-19 16:21:49 -0700, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I still feel that the only safe way to do this is to find the union of
'ldconfig -r' and 'pkg_info -L' and save those files, and those files only.
That should be intersection, not union.
Yeah, that's
On my system, the program pkg_version can double its speed simply by
replacing "make -V PKGNAME" by "make BEFOREPORTMK=yes -V PKGNAME" in
src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/version. Basically what it does is to tell
"make" to process only about half of bsd.port.mk.
It seems to me that with some clever
On May 19, 2007, at 9:30 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
gtk20 is causing me fits, but that's just the symptom. The cause
is that the pkg database(s) are fubared
Let me add that on my system with WITHOUT_X11 also has a foobarred
pkg database. It seems to improve a bit wi
well..i have an X i guess. don't know how to add a new terminal here.
here is some nice error messages
Unmatched ".
firefox
(Gecko:3325): Pango-WARNING **: No builtin or dynamically loaded modules
were found. Pango will not work correctly. This probably means
there was an error in the creat
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
i am sorry for having a "low comfort level." i want to improve.
guessing where x11-toolkit/gtk20 is (even though the location hasn't
BSD.local.dist still isn't
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Don't try. portupgrade is maintained by someone else, and the scripts are a
mess.
If someone could have improved the scripts, they would have tried a while
ago..
oh d
On Sat, 19 May 2007, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
The closest I can find to any details on this is your posting of
17 May 2007 12:05:07 -0700 where you post an extract of gtk20
failing to configure. Did you follow the instructions that you
copied into that pos
Garrett Cooper wrote:
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
The closest I can find to any details on this is your posting of
17 May 2007 12:05:07 -0700 where you post an extract of gtk20
failing to configure. Did you follow the instructions that you
copied into that
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
The closest I can find to any details on this is your posting of
17 May 2007 12:05:07 -0700 where you post an extract of gtk20
failing to configure. Did you follow the instructions that you
copied into that posting?
last thing i
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
My lord.. now I see what everyone means in terms of taking a long
time to update the ports / package databases. If you use portsnap, it
doesn't take a long time. However, if you use csup/cvsup, it appears
to tak
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
The closest I can find to any details on this is your posting of
17 May 2007 12:05:07 -0700 where you post an extract of gtk20
failing to configure. Did you follow the instructions that you
copied into that posting?
last thing i tried was:
#pkg_dei
[Picking a random posting]
For the past 4 days, you have been making a variety of "doing X broke
Y" comments in a variety of threads without ever providing sufficient
information to allow someone else to make a sensible response. The
posting I am replying to is no different.
On 2007-May-19 16:18
On 2007-May-19 16:21:49 -0700, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Before deinstall, save shared libs in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg
> 2. After install, remove anything from /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg with the
> same name as something installed by the new port.
One possible gotcha with blind
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
My lord.. now I see what everyone means in terms of taking a long
time to update the ports / package databases. If you use portsnap, it doesn't
take a long time. However, if you use csup/cvsup, it appears to take a long
time running make and ruby
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 18:14:01
-0400):
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:01 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Ok chaps, I think I have it.
This involves no recursive calls of make. Furthermore the
Peter Jeremy wrote:
If you upgrade to xorg 7.2 but don't cleanup the /etc files then rc.d
and periodic scripts are processe twice.
Here is a lightly tested patch to rc.subr that should do the trick. If
someone wants to give this a ride on a system where this issue has
been a problem, I can
On Sun, 20 May 2007 02:50:09 +0400 (MSD)
Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I'd successfully upgraded my notebook approx a week ago using tarred
> experimental tree.
>
> However, just after The Big Commit [tm] ;) I'd falled into very strange erro
> (last few li
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 12:47:07AM +0200, Andreas Gehrke wrote:
> when PHP 5.2.2 will be available for install via the ports collection.
There has been a global freeze to enable the xorg7.2 import and the
move from X11BASE to LOCALBASE. This has delayed the php update. We
hope to fix php soon.
Michel Talon wrote:
Not completely because some programs install shared libraries in very
non standard places, notably perl installs perl.so like this:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE/libperl.so
or mozilla installs mozilla libs in another strange place. And there are
other ports which make
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Giancarlo Rubio wrote:
--
Giancarlo Rubio
"Linux is for people who hate Windows,
BSD is for people who love UNIX"
Freebsd-BR User #88
i believe i fall into the latter.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Laganakos Vassilis wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
prevented the upgrade of the rest ports. The "faulted" ones are:
x11-toolkits/tix
x11-toolkits/qt4-gui
devel/sdl12
graphics/gimp
print/guten
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Please be aware that the portsnap snapshot hasn't been updated yet to
> include the X.org 7.2 addition, if you use portsnap.
Right now, portsnap is distributing half of Xorg 7.2. This isn't portsnap's
fault; the portsnap buildbox CVSuped from cvsup-master in the middle of
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
PL> Dmitry Morozovsky p??e v ne 20. 05. 2007 v 02:50 +0400:
PL>
PL> > However, just after The Big Commit [tm] ;) I'd falled into very strange
erro
PL> > (last few lines from script log):
PL> >
PL> > ===> portupgrade-2.2.6_3,2 depends on file: /usr/lo
Hello Alex Dupre.
Thanks for your good job as maintainer for the php5 port. I was
wondering when PHP 5.2.2 will be available for install via the ports
collection.
Best regards,
Andreas Gehrke
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 03:10:07PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
I presume there will be followup commits at some stage to fix
src/etc/defaults/rc.conf src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf and
src/etc/login.conf
I presume that by "fix" you mean "remove X11R6 rela
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-May-19 15:10:07 -0700, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
I presume there will be followup commits at some stage to fix
src/etc/defaults/rc.conf src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf and
src/etc/login.conf
I presume that by "fix" you mean "remove X
On 5/19/07, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
The gist of the email is asking the age old question, "are we there
yet?"
As many have commented there are a number of issues with a variety of
ports which need to be addressed. Some I've noticed are net/samba3 and
sy
Dmitry Morozovsky píše v ne 20. 05. 2007 v 02:50 +0400:
> However, just after The Big Commit [tm] ;) I'd falled into very strange erro
> (last few lines from script log):
>
> ===> portupgrade-2.2.6_3,2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ruby18 - found
> ===> portupgrade-2.2.6_3,2 depends on fil
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM> Dear colleagues,
DM>
DM> I'd successfully upgraded my notebook approx a week ago using tarred
DM> experimental tree.
DM>
DM> However, just after The Big Commit [tm] ;) I'd falled into very strange
erro
DM> (last few lines from script log):
DM>
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 01:51:02PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Wouldn't it be sufficient to force major component testers (in this
> case Xorg 7.2) to use periodic snapshots of the ports tree (possibly CVS
> branching), while allowing continued development in the ports tree?
In this particula
Dear colleagues,
I'd successfully upgraded my notebook approx a week ago using tarred
experimental tree.
However, just after The Big Commit [tm] ;) I'd falled into very strange erro
(last few lines from script log):
===> portupgrade-2.2.6_3,2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ruby18 - found
==
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 03:10:07PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> >I presume there will be followup commits at some stage to fix
> >src/etc/defaults/rc.conf src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf and
> >src/etc/login.conf
>
> I presume that by "fix" you mean "remove X11R6 related stu
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:04:51AM +0400, Sergey Kovalev wrote:
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >(sorry for cross-posting, but this is relevant to ports@ too)
> >
> >Please be aware that the portsnap snapshot hasn't been updated yet to
> >include the X.org 7.2 addition, if you use portsnap. I need to tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Talking about branching, I think we did effectively have a short-lived
"development branch" in the git repository. It is too painful and
inefficient to branch in the CVS, not to mention merging the branches
afterwards. Had we have lightweight branch
On 2007-May-19 15:28:03 -0700, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
>> Maybe it would have been useful to have a 'pre 7.2 import' tag
>
> That was actually done. It would definitely be useful for you to check the
> CVS repository before guessing about stuff like this. :)
On 2007-May-19 15:10:07 -0700, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
>> I presume there will be followup commits at some stage to fix
>> src/etc/defaults/rc.conf src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf and
>> src/etc/login.conf
>
> I presume that by "fix" you mean "remove X11R6 rela
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Maybe it would have been useful to have a 'pre 7.2 import' tag
That was actually done. It would definitely be useful for you to check
the CVS repository before guessing about stuff like this. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
Garrett Cooper wrote:
(sorry for cross-posting, but this is relevant to ports@ too)
Please be aware that the portsnap snapshot hasn't been updated yet to
include the X.org 7.2 addition, if you use portsnap. I need to try cvsup
as well to see if the modifications outstanding with the cvsup serv
On 2007-May-19 14:46:56 -0700, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> Wouldn't it be sufficient to force major component testers (in this
>>> case Xorg 7.2) to use periodic snapshots of the ports tree (possibly CVS
>>> branching), while all
Peter Jeremy wrote:
I presume there will be followup commits at some stage to fix
src/etc/defaults/rc.conf src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf and
src/etc/login.conf
I presume that by "fix" you mean "remove X11R6 related stuff." My vote
(as someone deeply interested in /etc and especially rc.d rel
On 2007-May-19 21:49:28 +0100, Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As you may already know, the X11 team has been working hard for the past
>few months to upgrade X.org ports to 7.2. After a couple of weeks of
>testing, we've finally committed this upgrade. We also decided to make
>the PREF
Doug Barton wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Wouldn't it be sufficient to force major component testers (in
this case Xorg 7.2) to use periodic snapshots of the ports tree
(possibly CVS branching), while allowing continued development in the
ports tree?
There will be very few truly major pr
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Wouldn't it be sufficient to force major component testers (in this
case Xorg 7.2) to use periodic snapshots of the ports tree (possibly CVS
branching), while allowing continued development in the ports tree?
There will be very few truly major projects of this nature
Erik Norgaard wrote:
Joseph Marah wrote:
Does anyone know if this is available for FreeBSD as a port? Thanks.
I have just received a message on the ports list that xorg 7.2 has been
merged into the ports tree:
"As you may already know, the X11 team has been working hard for the
past few m
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello,
The gist of the email is asking the age old question, "are we there
yet?"
As many have commented there are a number of issues with a variety
of ports which need to be addressed. Some I've noticed are net/samba3
and sysutils/eject, which contain security
Hello,
The gist of the email is asking the age old question, "are we there
yet?"
As many have commented there are a number of issues with a variety of
ports which need to be addressed. Some I've noticed are net/samba3 and
sysutils/eject, which contain security issues affecting produc
As you may already know, the X11 team has been working hard for the past
few months to upgrade X.org ports to 7.2. After a couple of weeks of
testing, we've finally committed this upgrade. We also decided to make
the PREFIX merge at the same time (moving X11BASE into LOCALBASE), which
explains why
On Fri, 18 May 2007 12:18:31 -0500
"Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> On 5/18/07, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > How do I configure trac to use mysql rather than sqlite??
> >
> You'll need to make the following changes to the ports Makefile:
>
> 1. Add `MYSQ
The problem with sdl12 was related to evas port. If DirectFB rendering
is enabled in graphics/evas, then devel/sdl does not compile and gives
the error I reported.
I disabled the DirectFB rendering in evas, and sdl installed correctly.
The other ones failed again, but I hope after a few "portupgra
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 12:05:07PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On May 19, 2007 10:27:36 AM +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >I didn't sym-link /usr/X11R6 (for testing), but something creates an
> >empty /usr/X11R6/share/locale/.
> >
> Looks like that would be gettext:
>
For those of you who didn't follow the thread where we did this, Alexander
Leidinger and I have made modifications to the port registration process
that make it significantly faster for ports with many dependencies. Sorry
for tooting our horn a bit, but I am really excited about this and I want
--On May 19, 2007 10:27:36 AM +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I didn't sym-link /usr/X11R6 (for testing), but something creates an
empty /usr/X11R6/share/locale/.
Looks like that would be gettext:
grep -r "{X11BASE}/share/locale" ports/*
ports/devel/gettext/Makefile: @${MKDI
--
Giancarlo Rubio
"Linux is for people who hate Windows,
BSD is for people who love UNIX"
Freebsd-BR User #88
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PR
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested
> developers to participate in this process: it's now up to you guys to
> test the upgrade and report problems you encounter, before we unleash
> it on the general user ba
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:43 -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:24:02PM -0500, James Snyder wrote:
> > Window decorations died once while switching back and forth to another
> > virtual terminal and GL screensavers hang up (first frame rendered,
> > subsequent ones do not).
>
>
On Fri, 18 May 2007, James Snyder wrote:
Regarding the trials and tribulations. I did not, at first, get the message
that one shouldn't overlay the testing tree on top of the older tree, and did
the first libXft upgrade at that point. That failed and subsequently I
needed to do a series of
Howdy,
I've been working on a new version of portmaster to address the
problems exposed in the last gettext upgrade, as well as some other
issues. It's available at http://dougbarton.us/portmaster
I have not yet implemented the "save old shared libs" option, that
will come next assuming no b
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:30:32PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
Le Jeu 10 mai 07 ? 23:28:17 +0200, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
?crivait?:
We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested
developers to participate in this process
I noticed this regression in the new ports tree:
root:peedub:~:bash:5> cd /scr1/ports/
root:peedub:ports:bash:6> setenv PORTSDIR /scr1/ports
root:peedub:ports:bash:8> setenv XORG_UPGRADE yes
root:peedub:ports:bash:9> cd x11/nvidia-driver-7184/
root:peedub:nvidia-driver-7184:bash:10> make all
===>
Hi,
I installed ports from the xorg7.2 tarball (KDE, Opera, Firefox,
Claws-mail, datastudio, gmplayer, xmss, softmaker-office, ... ) on my
desktop.
This was a clean install, on a newly installed CURRENT.
The list of ports is here:
http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/FreeBSD/div/installed_ports.txt
E
62 matches
Mail list logo
