Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 18:14:01
-0400):
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:01 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Ok chaps, I think I have it.
This involves no recursive calls of make. Furthermore the
dependencies it creates are the real dependencies on your system,
not what ports thinks it should be, because it gets all the
information from /var/db/pkg. On my system it takes a second or two
to register a port
- it takes about the same amount of time whether it has few
dependencies or many, except when there are zero dependencies, when
it takes no
time at all.
If I get some positive feedback on this one, I'll submit a PR. You
can try it out by typing "make actual-package-depends" as opposed to
"make package-depends."
Ok, I'm really trying to make sense of these numbers...
For gnome2-2.18.1_1 on my -current system...
rnoland-ibm% make package-depends|wc -l
362
rnoland-ibm% make actual-package-depends|wc -l
294
Registered the old way:
rnoland-ibm% grep @pkgdep /var/db/pkg/gnome2-2.18.1_1/+CONTENTS|wc -l
176
and the new way:
rnoland-ibm% grep @pkgdep /var/db/pkg/gnome2-2.18.1_1/+CONTENTS|wc -l
294
I put together an awk script yesterday which was very close to the one
Alexander posted and got 295... and the diff of the output of my awk and
actual-package-depends is much more than a single line, which I also
can't yet explain.
I had a look at it. It is missing those dependencies which are not
installed. Depending on when this target is used, this is ok or not.
Some benchmark:
---snip---
[original]
make package-depends 80.18s user 53.92s system 73% cpu 3:01.53 total
make package-depends 80.70s user 52.94s system 87% cpu 2:32.25 total
make package-depends > /tmp/list1 79.58s user 54.28s system 87% cpu
2:32.59 total
[no AWK]
make actual-package-depends 4.76s user 7.46s system 57% cpu 21.082 total
make actual-package-depends 4.87s user 7.34s system 67% cpu 18.019 total
make actual-package-depends > /tmp/list2 4.58s user 7.60s system 87%
cpu 13.942 total
[AWK]
make actual-package-depends 3.15s user 7.45s system 85% cpu 12.420 total
make actual-package-depends 3.13s user 7.49s system 84% cpu 12.524 total
make actual-package-depends 3.11s user 7.49s system 88% cpu 11.995 total
make actual-package-depends >| /tmp/list3 3.16s user 7.42s system 89%
cpu 11.83 0 total
[AWK + partly missing (only direct dependencies)]
make actual-package-depends > /tmp/list4 4.60s user 7.63s system 90%
cpu 13.479 total
make actual-package-depends 4.68s user 7.56s system 87% cpu 13.985 total
make actual-package-depends 4.58s user 7.64s system 89% cpu 13.594 total
...sorting list1 & list2 & list3 & list4...
% wc -l /tmp/list*s
320 /tmp/list1s
308 /tmp/list2s
308 /tmp/list3s
310 /tmp/list4s
1246 total
---snip---
Note, there was trackerd running in the background while testing...
For the difference between the redirected output case: I think the
gnome terminal needs a lot of time to print all the lines. But still,
the awk version takes around 3/4 of the time (interesting is the user
time, not the total time). Stephen's version can be speed up some
fractions by inserting a break into the first while-loop.
Attached is my awk-version and the awk version which also includes the
direct dependencies.
Bye,
Alexander.
I think I like Alexander's awk version better than mine. Alexander -
can I ask you to submit the PR using send-pr?
Stephen
My lord.. now I see what everyone means in terms of taking a long time
to update the ports / package databases. If you use portsnap, it doesn't
take a long time. However, if you use csup/cvsup, it appears to take a
long time running make and ruby (primarily disk I/O), to update all of
the databases. It took approximately 3-5 minutes to complete on a P4 3.0
GHz, so I'd hate to see how long it takes to finish on a slower machine
=\...
Maybe this is where Stephen's revisions to pkg_add and bsd.ports.mk
would come in handy.
-Garrett
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
