Marco's Zec's work IHMO is pretty good to be ignored. It can be
adopted to 6.x pretty easily. I think having this in the base system
along with jails makes it even more sweater and makes us a step ahead
of zones (as in OpenSolaris).
I understand it's an overkill for your requirements, but it's the
Can't you just incorporate Marko's work at
http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/vimage/index.html? The design looks
pretty clean too. And, XORP which probably is multiple tables aware,
would make FreeBSD a really kick-ass routing platform.
Just my $.02
Ray.
On 5/9/06, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED
system and multiple such logical systems may be
configured on a single FreeBSD system.
Regards,
Ray.
On 5/9/06, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Milan Obuch wrote:
>On Tuesday 09 May 2006 22:25, Ray Mihm wrote:
>
>
>>Can't you just incorporate Marko&#x
ving
this feature in FreeBSD.
Regards,
Ray.
On 5/9/06, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ray Mihm wrote:
> Using ipfw tables is essentially a non-starter, IMHO. How would
> routing protocols use ipfw based tables, for example? Marko's work
> touches a lot of files, bu
