Marco's Zec's work IHMO is pretty good to be ignored. It can be adopted to 6.x pretty easily. I think having this in the base system along with jails makes it even more sweater and makes us a step ahead of zones (as in OpenSolaris).
I understand it's an overkill for your requirements, but it's the right thing to do. Ray. On 3/19/06, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm looking at a problem where I want onemachine to really look like 2. > this means I want to have 2 separate routing tables if possible. > > I know I could do it with eas if I could user Marco Zec's vimage patches > but I need to have a path forward to 6.x and beyond > > An answer would be to re-implement vimage for newer versions of FreeBSD but > it's a bit of overkill and I was wondering if anyone had done anything > in this direction? > > Basically just allowing a jail to specify a different routing table > would be enough.... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
