Using ipfw tables is essentially a non-starter, IMHO. How would routing protocols use ipfw based tables, for example? Marko's work touches a lot of files, but I don't think it's heavy weight.
I also think using Marko's idea and Jails would allow create the notion of a logical system and multiple such logical systems may be configured on a single FreeBSD system. Regards, Ray. On 5/9/06, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Milan Obuch wrote: >On Tuesday 09 May 2006 22:25, Ray Mihm wrote: > > >>Can't you just incorporate Marko's work at >>http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/vimage/index.html? The design looks >>pretty clean too. And, XORP which probably is multiple tables aware, >>would make FreeBSD a really kick-ass routing platform. >> >> marco and I have discussed this. it is a very heavyweight solution.. using ipfw tables as ancilary routing tables is a very light weight solution.. >> >> > >Unfortunately, this is not easily doable. There is major architecture change >after 4.x and Marko's work is 4.x based. But base design is really clean and >should be mimicked as close as possible, imho. > >I know this is not easy task. Just shame on me I can't help here with some >code :( > >Regards, >Milan > >Please reply to maling list only. I read it regularly. > >
_______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
