I'm not a zeroconf expert per se, but I would love to see FreeBSD have
a great zeroconf implementation. Here are some things to think about.
If your first implementation happens to leave the interface with a
169.254 IP address, it's doing something it shouldn't, however that is
likely to be mo
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 11:53:10AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:05:50AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> P> I am seeing a lot of ICMP Must Fragment packets with incorrect ICMP
> P> checksums on a RELENG_4 box which holds up 40-60 PPTP (mpd/Netgraph) VPN
&
ec 2 10:31:16 EET 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src-bsd/4.0S/src/sys/UNNAMED i386
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Dec 2 11:43 /var/db/pkg/mpd-3.18_2
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP key:http://people.Fr
promisc !
the rc.conf has the "Gateway_enable="YES".
Can somebody tell me if there is a solution,...?
Thanks.
Peter Rog
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any
list of allowed ports without
success.
Peter Brezny
purplecat.net
828-250-9446
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
A few ideas come to mind. You could trying using a web proxy. Or, if
you are running an open source browser, you could try to use the
IP_OPTIONS socket option to specify strict source routing and then
supply the exact path the packet must take. I would try using a web
proxy first.
Pete
On F
Hi all,
Hope someone can help me with this question:
"What does DNS do when the same hostname is reported from multiple
systems with different IP addresses? "
Thx...Peter
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
One thing you can try if you want to avoid needing super user
privileges is to send a small UDP packet to the given IP, which will
force the kernel to ARP for the address if it is not already present.
Then you can check the routing table through sysctl() by passing in
{CTL_NET, PF_ROUTE, 0, AF
ell as supporting automated conformance testing. Our
techniques may be useful in the development of new protocols and
extensions.
We would greatly appreciate feedback, on both content and usability.
Peter, for the Netsem team:
Steve Bishop, Matthew Fairbairn, Michael Norrish, Peter
>Hi Peter,
>
>Interesting paper and work.
Many thanks.
>Are you plannning to share the tools as
>well? That's what I'd be most interested in seeing, basically the
>ability to turn your conformance tests into regression tests.
It's unclear at the moment -
at (though I don't think it helps right
now).
>> What kind of regression testing is in use now?
>
>None for the most part. People test some limited things, but I don't
>think anyone does the kind if rigorous testing we should be doing.
ah :-(
cheers,
Peter
___
paul klatt wrote:
Could anyone please tell me how to get dsl setup done on freebsd, I woudl
really appreciate the help
I'm afraid we will need more detail than that. Is this a PPPoE modem or
is it a DSL router? How is it connected to the machine? Do you wish to
setup NAT?
--
.---
Paul Klatt wrote:
It is the speedstream5100 pppoe modem. I do not know
what nat is. It is a router and it is connected to the
machine by an ethernet car
Please read
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pppoe.html
--
.---.
|. _
Does anyone have any objection to me committing the patch in this thread?
(Note: I inadvertently included a local change that no longer prevents
non-root users from opening up /dev/tap*: I don't intend to commit
that part of it)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Peter Ed
nd can therefore drop them from its transmit buffer (or resend them if
they are not received)? In particular, if there is no traffic for a
period, the only way that the last packet (before the break) can be
confirmed is via acknowledge timeouts.
--
Peter Jeremy
suggestions or has seen this issue, I'd be
very greatful. Would it be possible to get the bridge to block BPDU
(ugly hack I'm sure).
Cheers,
Pete.
--
Peter Wood BSc (Hons) :: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :: Tel +44 1606 828010
___
freebsd-ne
t for reference, so it'll appear somewhere in a
archive if others need it.
Pete.
--
Peter Wood BSc (Hons) :: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :: Tel +44 1606 828010
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ne
Good Afternoon,
I'm now working at a large UK university in their network support
department, as such one of my duties is to monitor the residences
network. To this end I have a cloned nic for every vlan that we have on
resnet. It roughly comes to over 50 vlans, and FreeBSD its self copes
ver
any chance to disable NAT for one of the IP's the easy way?
I know I can assign both public IPs to BSD and then use ipfw to route
1 to WS1 and other to WS2 and WS3...but that's the last resort.
Please CC answer to me, I don't have the
Thanks a lot, this solved the problem right away... one simple line i
couldn't find :/
Thanks!
------
Peter Gregorc
Paranoid Metal Webzine
http://www.paranoid-zine.com
--
On Thursday, November 3, 2005, 5:54:45 AM, you wrote:
Matthew>
Hi,
I’m running 11-STABLE as of today and was trying to use the -mapall parameter,
but it doesn’t have any effect.
Anybody else using this?
Peter
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To
Hi, can somebody please show me the correct syntax of setting static SA
with aes-xcbc-mac authentication? I checked rfc3566, my "base"
encryption algo is aes-128, aes-xcbc-mac is supposed to work with a
128-bit (16 characters) long key. I don't seem to be able to set it up,
though.
Example (a
On 27/11/2017 06:15, Peter G. wrote:
> Hi, can somebody please show me the correct syntax of setting static SA
> with aes-xcbc-mac authentication? I checked rfc3566, my "base"
> encryption algo is aes-128, aes-xcbc-mac is supposed to work with a
> 128-bit (16 characters) lon
A few years back a working group announced their work on MPTCP for
FreeBSD, http://caia.swin.edu.au/newtcp/mptcp/. Around that time also a
QR mentioned the project,
https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2013-01-2013-03.html#Multipath-TCP-(MPTCP)-for-FreeBSD
Since then all of this seems to
On 26/01/2018 09:37, Outback Dingo wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Peter G. wrote:
>> A few years back a working group announced their work on MPTCP for FreeBSD,
>> http://caia.swin.edu.au/newtcp/mptcp/. Around that time also a QR mentioned
>> the project,
>&
Hi,
I have been using a TP-Link TL-WDN4800.
It has hostap support, because that’s how I used it. Had lots of stuck beacon
messages, but it kept doing its job.
Peter
> On 6 Feb 2018, at 07:04, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Victor Sudakov
us letter.
>
>Thank you. If zmap ends up not suiting my needs, I will
>definitely look into libpcap.
Since no-one else has mentioned it, another option would be divert(4),
which is part of IPFW.
--
Peter Jeremy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
policy once started.
Peter
> On 25 Apr 2018, at 13:48, Victor Gamov wrote:
>
> On 23/04/2018 15:43, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> Your security associations doesn't match your security policies.
>> Probably you did interfaces reconfiguration without clearin
Andrey,
I was planning to move towards Strongswan anyway. The 1st step (with 1
interface worked great)
Julian,
The idea of having a jail as VPN end-point is going to help me transition step
by step and possibly have both racoon and strongswan active.
Thx,
Peter
> On 9 May 2018, at 03
it breaks any
existing stuff.
Peter
> On 13 May 2018, at 13:59, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>
> On 08.05.2018 16:51, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> I think for proper support of several if_ipsec interfaces racoon needs
>> some patches. But I have not spare time to do this job.
Hi,
I’m using VIMAGE on stable for more than a year now. No issues, but I did apply
patches from CURRENT. As far as I know those patches have not been MFC’ed.
I have applied the following commits. 306684, 307234, 312942, 313000, 313167,
315130, 315135, 315468, 315740, 317399, 320847
Peter
hose patches have not been
> MFC’ed.
>
> I have applied the following commits. 306684, 307234, 312942, 313000, 313167,
> 315130, 315135, 315468, 315740, 317399, 320847
>
> Peter
>
> On 18 Jul 2018, at 01:56, Raja Sivaramakrishnan via freebsd-net
> wrote:
>
>
o USB adapters. They are explicitly
excluded from the proposed deprecation.
>BTW, I also use fxp interfaces a lot, but that's just because I have
Also explicitly excluded because of its popularity.
--
Peter Jeremy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ends to cover nearly all 100 cards, yet no
>one (pardon me if I missed those) asks for 10. So how about making this
>proposal cover only 10 cards,
What is the purpose in keeping unused FastEthernet cards in the tree?
>if you can't resist the itch to remove
>something from th
machine with only a single /128 address?
Found this as reference:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208173 but what he did
was on a much broader range.
Many thanks!
Peter
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/
On 15/02/2019 17:49, Peter G. wrote:
> Now the GRE tunnel
>
>> ifconfig gre6 create
>> ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::200 tunnelfib 6
> #ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists
>
> Why is this not possible? Isn't the logic behind it the same
On 19/02/2019 14:06, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:38 PM Peter G. wrote:
>
>> On 15/02/2019 17:49, Peter G. wrote:
>>> Now the GRE tunnel
>>>
>>>> ifconfig gre6 create
>>>> ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::20
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 08:33:00AM +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 04/22/15 19:19, Peter Holm wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:45:21AM +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> On 04/15/15 21:04, Peter Holm wrote:
, udp } from $jail_host to $ext_if port{
$service1, service2 } -> $int_lb
Cheers
--
Oliver PETER oli...@gfuzz.de 0x456D688F
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:03:54PM +, Big Lebowski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Oliver Peter wrote:
>
> > El duderino,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:30:59PM +, Big Lebowski wrote:
> > >
> > > I am trying to set up a 11.0-R
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:49:18PM +, Big Lebowski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Oliver Peter wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:03:54PM +, Big Lebowski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Oliver Peter
> > wrote:
> > >
>
this it worked ok.
Next reboot everything was fine.
Anybody know why mountd could have been listening to port 993?
Peter
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
f anyone is doing this type of configuration in their labs?
I used to do something similar on my netbook - see
https://www.bugs.au.freebsd.org/dokuwiki/laggdiskless
I haven't tried it recently but it definitely worked early on in 10.x.
--
Peter Jeremy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
keg->uk_maxpages) {
keg->uk_flags &= ~UMA_ZFLAG_FULL;
Peter
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
why I tried it.
I have added debug information to print the zone’s and the keg’s and It all
looked good. I was not able to find any place where we operated on the wrong
context, but perhaps I missed one.
I’ll dig further.
Peter
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 12:42, Marko Zec wrote:
>
> On We
I’ll test this today.
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 15:32, Kristof Provost wrote:
>
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 15:28, Marko Zec wrote:
>> Right. But pfi_attach_group_event() and the other handlers cited above
>> _do_ in fact invoke CURVNET_SET(vnet0) on entry, overriding the proper
>> vnet choice from the call
It doesn’t solve my problem, but below is the stack back trace that leads to
the problem that allocation doen for the default vnet are given back as part of
the vnet destroy.
#0 0x807ff275 at pfr_destroy_kentry+0x35
#1 0x807fe47c at pfr_remove_kentries+0x1fc
#2 0x808053cd
Yeah, you are right. To keep the pf code as unchanged as possible, it is
sometimes unclear whether something is virtualised or not.
The SLIST_HEAD and RB_HEAD in pfvar.h need virtualisation as well.
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 21:41, Marko Zec wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:24:33 +0200
> mailto:p
responding with zone ’safe’ does not work.
Both members are vlan interfaces. I have tried to disable any hardware vlan
capabilities, nut no effect
I’m running recent 12-STABLE
I need to have both segments on the same IP segment. If someone has other ideas
to do it dif
I believe if you remove the work-around "exec.poststop = "jib destroy
${name}”;” this panic happens
Peter
> On 3 May 2020, at 18:42, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219901
>
> --- Comment #5 from Krist
going via some external updater (like mountd). That probably
would be an even better way (for ZFS) but a DB database might be useful anyway.
It’s a very simple change (especially in mountd - it just opens the DB file and
reads the records sequentially instead of the text file).
- Peter
> O
Is this related to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234985
<https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234985> and
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238326
<https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238326>
/Peter
> 21 juli
I got information that there are work on a kernel module for Wireguard
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25425 <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25425>
Where can I download and test this? I have a spare amd64 currently running
13.0-CURRENT r363439 available for test purposes.
Ok!, Then I would need instructions how i get that diff in to the src tree :-)
any pointers to documentation will be helpful.
Thanks
Peter
> 25 juli 2020 kl. 12:34 skrev Goran Mekić :
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:32:00PM +0200, Peter Libassi wrote:
>> I got information that th
. If this is
the case i would like to see this introduced in to route(8) and netstat(1)
/Peter
> 16 aug. 2020 kl. 11:11 skrev Alexander V. Chernikov :
>
> I want to introduce ip(8) or something similar in base.
> Basically, I need some userland tool to explicitly operates on nexthops
1.12.0/24
# ifconfig wg0 peer-list
[Peer]
PublicKey = bmUgcaOtlEFcIoSlwPQ3qO/c14nJHYr+a7Ms/kJmOFA
Endpoint = 192.168.4.4:
AllowedIPs = 0.0.10.11/24, 0.0.10.11/24
Otherwise this looks really nice! Next i’ll try some connectivity tests.
/Peter
___
I can confirm that the issue reported in
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247853
<https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247853> is now resolved.
Thanks
Peter
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
156 ms (same route)
/Peter
> 14 okt. 2020 kl. 09:05 skrev Julian Elischer :
>
> Can someone send me the output of a ping -R , starting with FreeBSD machine,
> through a second FreeBSD machine and bouncing back from a third FreeBSD
> machine? I don't have three in a row like th
0xfe06facdeac0
amd64_syscall() at amd64_syscall+0x147/frame 0xfe06facdebf0
fast_syscall_common() at fast_syscall_common+0xf8/frame 0xfe06facdebf0
https://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/log0052.txt
- Peter
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
pcib8
> pcib9: at device 0.0 numa-domain 0 on pci8
> pci9: numa-domain 0 on pcib9
> pcib10: at device 0.0 numa-domain 0 on pci9
> pci10: numa-domain 0 on pcib10
> ixl2: Link is upError: No response to keepalive - Terminating session
Anyone else seen this problem?
- Peter
_
gs… Like the bugs in the Linux gss daemons or their single-threaded mount()
sys call, or automounter freezing up... and other fun bugs.
- Peter
> On 17 Mar 2021, at 23:17, Jason Breitman
> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the responses.
> The NFS Client does properly negotiate down to 128
interest
unfortunately...
Not really helpful but that it self-healed after a (long) while is interesting
I think…
- Peter
> On 6 Apr 2021, at 01:24, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> tue...@freebsd.org <mailto:tue...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> [stuff snipped]
>> OK. What is the
Windows SMB has a similar feature.
Just avoid the Linux NFS mounting deadlock issue with “down” servers please :-)
- Peter
ed me solve the problem.
I don't understand:
a) Why outgoing ICMP packets from firewall to VPS aren't going through
the IPSEC transport.
b) Why firewall is ignoring incoming IPSEC esp packets.
Is anyone able to help?
--
Peter Jeremy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
(from the Internet) packets.
At this point:
* I can exchange encrypted packets locally between firewall and VPS
* Encrypted packets sent from VPS will arrive at Host (once
net.inet.ipsec.filtertunnel is set).
* Packets sent from Host to VPS get sent unencrypted over the Internet.
I'm confid
/~pho/stress/log/log0275.txt
- Peter
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:33:15PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 4/1/22 19:07, Peter Holm wrote:
> > markj@ asked me to post this one:
> >
> > panic: rw lock 0xf801bccb1410 not unlocked
> > cpuid = 4
> > time = 1648770125
> > KDB: stack ba
riviliged user. But when i
posed a related question on -questions, someone told me that sandbox =
chrooted environment.
I also want to know, if you are running named under an unpriviliged user, is
it worth the extra trouble to run it chrooted?
Thanks for your help.
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin
and in order to keep things functioning until it's done, I'm gong to
have to keep both the inside and outside nic's plugged into the same switch
(which gives a lot of errors like this).
/kernel: arp: 10.10.1.70 is on rl0 but got reply from (mac) on fpx0
TIA
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Service
I find it useful, and not that big of a deal to shut off in syslog.conf.
However, option c seems like a good idea.
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Services Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bosko Milekic
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 11
ave a
look at
http://www.bsdtoday.com/2000/December/Features359.html
for yet another
nat/ipfw how to.
Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SeanSent: Friday,
January 05, 2001 4:31 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROT
I've read through all of ch4 in dns & bind, and haven't
come across anything that says you couldn't do it this way...
Will named accept this?
Is it just a really bad idea?
TIA
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Services Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
ndary files.
TIA
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Services Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
do i tell internic?...ns1 -->network range 1, ns2 -->network range 2
and have the name server hold an IP from each isp's network range?
Thanks for your comments/suggestions.
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Services Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
zone transfers require more than just port
53?
TIA
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Services Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
first.domain.that.got.looked.up
mailin a ip.of.mail.com
Is there a way to get around this?
my primary server is running bind 8.2.3-T6b and the slave server is running
bind 8.1.2
Thanks in advance for your help.
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Services Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send
I thought I rememberd someone mentioning a sysctl control for turning off
the kernel arp messages when you have two nics on the same (misconfigured)
network, but I couldn't find it in the archives.
Anyone know?
Thanks.
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Services Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
27;s perform an nslookup using my
box as the server to do the queries on.
TIA
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Services Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
nslookup's fail from outside the firewall on another machine in nslookup
with server set to my firewall machine.
What have i missed?
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Services Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
he
means something to do with the networking stack - possibly the socket
upcall mechanism.
Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
essing a dying connection, thus contributing further
to the overload.
Anyway, just be careful, ok? larger listen queues are not a magic solution
for all problems. At 100 connections per second, the current limit is about
327 seconds worth of delay. at 500 per second, it is 65 seconds delay.
Cheer
Hi,
My DSL provider (KPN - mxstream) needs a PPTP connection. I am trying to
use netgraph-mpd to make this work. Any experience good or bad with this?
Peter
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
iable stoped working?
Feb 21 09:48:22 bsd1 /kernel: arp: 209.16.228.140 is on fxp0 but got reply
from 00:10:4b:99:7f:
6e on rl0
TIA
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Services Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Hello,
I've just added a second external interface to a machine. I'd like to not
have to duplicate all the rules that involve outside interfaces.
I've got rules like
$fwcmd add deny all from 0.0.0.0/8 to any in via $oif
is it possible to specify multiple interfaces for one rule by l
After reading through the natd man page, I think I understand what I need
to do to redirect requests to one specified ip to another, however, I
don't understand where I put this config info.
i currently start natd with rc.conf with the following lines:
natd_enable="YES"
#natd_config="/etc/rc.nat
many vlans ?
On incoming 802.1Q packets, there's a linear search through a list of
known VLAN numbers to determine the destination vlan device. Unless
you're planning on lots of VLAN's, this probably isn't an issue.
Peter
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
I am working with VLANs and a BayStack 450-T without stability problems,
except when you configure NETGRAPH at the same time. The kernel crashes
during boot-up.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Tancsa
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 04
r machine I have VLAN and NETGRAPH
compiled in, but haven't used the vlan interfaces yet. Maybe I'll do so this
weekend to get to the bottom of this.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Julian Elischer
Sent: Friday, February 23,
Stefan,
You have to patch mpd-netgraph to make it work.
I have recently found out how to use mpd-netgraph in such an environment.
Attached my patch and config files.
I don't have a written procedure yet. If you have questions, don't hesitate
to e-mail me.
Peter
-Origin
e: netgraph pptp and alcatel adsl modems
Peter Blok wrote:
>
> Name: mxstream.tar.gz
>mxstream.tar.gzType: Unix Tape Archive (application/x-tar)
> Enco
ng_ether_attach.
I had difficulty re-producing this on my test machine, because the conf file
was different. In my configuration the attach is probably not done because I
don't have a couple of drivers configured in.
I'm still looking at it.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
called and crashes. Im am now changing the load
order of ng_ether to load in an earlier stage.
I am not quite sure why it is not going wrong everytime. I have two configs.
The one that is working fine only loads the i4b stuff. The other doesn't.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: C. St
On 2001-Feb-23 10:52:17 +0100, "Pedro J. Lobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> - VLAN support in driver modules for the above drivers
>
>Including fxp? My code only supports vlan in modules for the 558 and 559
>controller
When using sendfile(2) with the optional headers, it appears
that sendfile inadvertently returns the number of bytes written
via writev (writev updates p_retval[0]). I checked through the
archives, and it doesn't appear that I'm using sendfile(2) incorrectly,
although that's always a possibility.
Actually, sendfile(2) returns either 0 or -1 (with errno set). The
optional 'sbytes' argument indicates how many bytes were sent.
Maybe I wasn't clear in my original posting. If you use the optional
headers, then the *return value* from sendfile is non-zero, and is
*only * the amount sent via wr
--> 209.16.228.150
Could someone please bump that system and have it update the cache.?...
TIA
Peter Brezny
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
I want to be able to forward all traffic coming to an external ip to an
internal ip.
I currently have nat configured and working so that all private internal
addresses are translated to a public ip as they leave the firewall machine
on their way out, but after reading the man page a couple of tim
Let's say I had two internal subnets that i'd like to nat with different
external ip's, while also doing static nat on one of each of the internal
ip's. Could i do that by doing something like thils:
rc.conf
natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf1"
natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf2"
rc.firewall
$fwcmd add
|
10.30.x.x--fbsd-gw_ipfw--wireless ethernet--fbsd_gw_ipfw
customer networkcustomer network
Your suggestions and criticisms are appreciated.
Peter Brezny
purplecat.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
I've managed to get things working, but I've still got a question or two.
Here's what i'm working with
> internet firewal/nat box client firewall client lan.
>pub pub/10.30.1.110.30.1.20/10.20.21.1 10.20.21.x
>From Right to Left, each machine's default GW is
201 - 300 of 456 matches
Mail list logo
