I’ll test this today. > On 20 Apr 2017, at 15:32, Kristof Provost <kris...@sigsegv.be> wrote: > > On 20 Apr 2017, at 15:28, Marko Zec wrote: >> Right. But pfi_attach_group_event() and the other handlers cited above >> _do_ in fact invoke CURVNET_SET(vnet0) on entry, overriding the proper >> vnet choice from the caller. >> > Yes, that does look wrong. > I should have looked a bit further. > >> Therefore the proper fix should be as simple as removing CURVNET_SET() / >> CURVNET_RESTORE() macro pairs from the cited handlers. >> > Hopefully, yes. I’ve still got some other pf/vnet issues on my todo list, but > I’ve now added this too. It might actually explain some other bug report I’ve > seen (but not looked at in any depth). > > Regards, > Kristof > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
