I know "top", but I don't want to be in front of the computer all the time
(because if the process finishes/dies the information vanished)
Thanks and sorry if this isn't an specifiq question about networking :)
--
JFRH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing l
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 16:57, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> > I know "top", but I don't want to be in front of the computer all the
> > time (because if the process finishes/dies the information vanished)
>
> Take a look at system ac
On Thursday 17 July 2003 17:05, Rolf Grossmann wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I've done some more research and I think I found the reason for my problem:
>
> It's in lib/libalias/alias.c rev 1.23:
> > Changed the way we handle outgoing ICMP error messages -- do
> > not alias `ip_src' unless it comes from t
On Monday 28 July 2003 07:17, Andy Gilligan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have three IPv6 /48 networks connected to a FreeBSD 4.8 router, and I
> allocate /64 tunnels from each network to client machines.
>
> Is there any way I can specify the next-hop or outbound interface to use
> on the router based on the
On Thursday 04 September 2003 01:35, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Could someone review my PR and let me know if they have also observed
> the problem? I will produce a fix shortly.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=56341
>
> Thanks
> BMS
Hello,
I've read your PR, and I've tr
On Friday 05 September 2003 11:51, Jan Mikael Melen wrote:
> > I've included as an attachment a patch that I have used to fix the
> > problem and allso as attached a short program which can be used to
> > regenerate the problem in unpatched FreeBSD 5.1-p2.
>
> Oops Forgot the other attachment..
On Saturday 06 September 2003 20:29, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:54:12AM +0200, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> > [snipped]
> > gre0: flags=b051 mtu 1476
> > inet 192.168.1.1 --> 192.168.2.1 netmask 0xff00
> > inet6
Hello all:
I'm using FreeBSD-4.8-RELEASE.
(I've tested the same thing using a KAME snap, so I CCs to them :)
I've got two routers sending RAs on the same link, so the
host is configured with two IPv6 prefix on the same NIC.
Watching the routing table I only see one default IPv6 route.
When I tr
On Monday 29 September 2003 19:22, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:59:08 +0200,
> >>>>> Juan Rodriguez Hervella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > I've got two routers sending RAs on the same link, so the
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 09:27, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> On Monday 29 September 2003 19:22, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> > >>>>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:59:08 +0200,
> > >>>>> Juan Rodriguez Hervella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
On Thursday 02 October 2003 17:04, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote:
> Hello Juan,
>
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:42:39 +0200
> >
> > Address of Router1: 2001:720:410:100b::3
> > Address of Router2: 2001:800:40:2471::4
>
> Please confirm connectivity from Router2 to Router1 by the following
> command.
>
Hello,
I would like to get information about the implementation
of Path MTU discovery for IPv6 (RFC-1981).
Is there any documentation about how this has been made ?
--
**
JFRH
**
Labor, n.:
One of the processes by which A acquires property for B.
-- Ambrose Bi
Hello:
I'm trying to block IPv6 icmp-request packets which might be sent
to my host. I'm using ip6fw on a FreeBSD-4.9.0-RELEASE.
When I do this:
add 100 deny ipv6-icmp from any to 2001:720:410:100f:20d:9dff:fe46:f2c9
icmptypes 8
Nothing seems to happen. I still can ping6 my host from a remote
Hello,
I'd like to make some modifications to the IPv6 hearder of some packets
before sending them out the interface. I'm thinking where's the best
way of doing this. So, I've found out the Netgraph tool (I didn't know it
before :) but now I'm wondering how to use it properly.
As far as I unders
rders...if I get the packet from the
"upper" hook and I modify the destination IP address, it will be wrong to
write the ethernet frame on the "lower" hook because the ethernet destination
addr. would be likely to be different... is this right ?
Thanks for you help.
On Thursday 11 December 2003 23:14, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>>more likely he wants something like ng_fec or ng_one2many
> >>
> >>Unless performance is the reason for bonding the ether channels...
> >>
> >>Can't we steal the Linux code? ;-)
> >
> > is the netgraph version
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 10:29, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> hi,
> in implementing ipv6 support for ipfw2, i hit the following
> problem: /etc/protocols has an entry:
>
> ipv641 IPV6# ipv6
>
> which is somewhat confusing for the parser -- if you
> type something like
>
>
Just some questions about this paper:
"(...) Note that this route has to be at the same level of the tree, i.e.
the code cannot return a less specific match or a more specific
match (...)"
Question: I don't understand why if you are looking for an alternate
route you aren't allowed to retrieve a
Hello,
I'm looking at the source code, trying to follow the steps that
happen when an IPv6-in-IPv6 packet is received, but Im quite
lost, I wonder if anybody could help me to understand it.
When the host receives an IPv6-in-IPv6 packet,
"encap6_input()" is call from "ip6_input()".
I don't under
Tuc at the Beach House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
>
>--redirect-gateway
> Automatically execute routing commands to cause all
> outgoing IP traffic to be redirected over the VPN.
> Currently implemented only on Linux and Windows.
An
(sorry If you receive twice this mail, I'm having problems
with my email)
Tuc at the Beach House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
>
>--redirect-gateway
> Automatically execute routing commands to cause all
> outgoing IP traffic to be redirected over the
What this is used for ?
--
**
JFRH
**
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello,
If I do a bridge between xl0 and xl1, can the IP address
configured on xl1 answer ARP-requests that come from the
LAN the xl0 is connected ? Does this make sense ?
--
**
JFRH
**
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
Hello,
I try to do this:
route add 163.117.139.99/32 -iface tap0
route change 163.117.139.99/32 -link 00:bd:82:1c:96:00
And when I see the result with "netstat -rn", I get this:
[snipped]
163.117.140.30/32 00:bd.82.1c.96.0 ULS 0 14 tap0
^^^
IFINFO) || (msg.ifm_index != wi_index) );
t= time( NULL );
printf("notification time: %s", ctime(&t) );
goto start;
/* never reached */
return 0;
}
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 10:21, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:02:51PM +0200, Juan Rodriguez Hervella
Hello,
I dont understand, looking at "man 4 route", how to use the RTM_IFINFO
message of a Routing Socket.
I mean, do I have to make a "write" on the socket with a
"struct if_msghdr" of type = RTM_IFINFO and later on a "read" with
the same data structure ?
Or can I just open the PF_ROUTE socket
On Monday 10 May 2004 20:32, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am quite new to this list :)
>
> Context:
> There's a bridge that does one logical net for two nics (vr0,rl0) on the
> same box (freebsd-4.10-prerelease).
>
> vr0 = outsite net (isp connected with dhclient)
> rl0 = inside net (192.168
Hello,
I'd like to try on some changes that I've made in our VoIP
testbed for mobility support at the application layer.
If the user requires support for seamless voice communication during
active call sessions on the mobile UA, it is imperative that the
wireless LAN setup should support roaming
Thank you very much for your replysee below
On Thursday 06 May 2004 15:01, Marco Molteni wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
> On Thu, 6 May 2004 Juan Rodriguez Hervella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to try on some changes that I've made i
29 matches
Mail list logo
