On Saturday 06 September 2003 20:29, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:54:12AM +0200, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote: > > [snipped] > > gre0: flags=b051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,LINK0,LINK1,MULTICAST> mtu 1476 > > inet 192.168.1.1 --> 192.168.2.1 netmask 0xffffff00 > > inet6 fe80::2c0:26ff:fea3:5df6%gre0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 > > > > > > Besides, I think that every interface already has a link-local IPv6 > > address, so I don't quite catch what you're saying in the PR, which I > > quoted here: > > > > "When the system is compiled with INET6 support, then any instance of > > a tunnel clone interface must have an AF_INET6 address configured on > > it for the tunnel source/destination to be displayed." > > I forgot to mention I've explicitly disabled ip6 link-local addresses > on my machine, via the following sysctl: > > net.inet6.ip6.auto_linklocal: 0 >
I thought that linklocal was mandatory on the IPv6 RFC, but I must be wrong :D Ok, good luck! > > BMS -- JFRH _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
