On Thursday 11 December 2003 23:14, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>>more likely he wants something like ng_fec or ng_one2many
> >>
> >>Unless performance is the reason for bonding the ether channels...
> >>
> >>Can't we steal the Linux code? ;-)
> >
> > is the netgraph version particularly slow?
>
> Not slower than a single ether channel, no ;-) Considerably
> slower than link layer bonding. The netgraph version provides
> a really useful functionality, and I suppose that 2GB and 10GB
> fiber interfaces will do away with any pressure to give us
> bonding in the kernel.
>
Hello,
I've never had heard talking about ng_fec, so I've been
looking at the pointers of the previous mails and I find it
very interesting, but there are some things I don't understand
well.
For example, if we aggregate 4 ethernet cards into one
virtual interface (fec), do this mean that the throughput is
4 times the capacity of one ethernet card ?.
Also, if the pyshical interfaces are connected to different LANs,
how can we think about the virtual iface ? is it as if we were
joining the 4 LANs to make one common link ? is this right ?
--
******
JFRH
******
A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody
wants to read.
-- Mark Twain
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
