On 8/13/22 17:44, gm...@dnmx.org wrote:
Hello there!
Hello.
Basically when I get the download speed in something like qBittorrent to
4Mbit/s, then my internet connection resets, and in `dmesg` I get "re0:
watchdog timeout" then re0 goes DOWN and UP.. and sometimes it seems to
also get stuck
On 1/26/23 17:08, Nicolas MASSE wrote:
Is there currently any reason to not have an implementation of VRRP
inside FreeBSD?
https://www.freshports.org/net/freevrrpd
(I remember I used it in the past, many many years ago; when CARP was
introduced in base, I switched, so I don't know how good i
Hello.
I'm evaluating a new box that will act as router...
I've been offered BCM5720 network cards (which should run with the bge
driver). Are they good WRT to stability and performance?
I've always used Intel...
Any good reason to stick with, e.g., an I210?
bye & Thanks
av.
Hello.
Lately, running bind 9.16.39, I'm seeing a lot of these (on several boxes):
named[22122]: validating in-addr.arpa/SOA: got insecure response; parent
indicates it should be secure
I know the general answer (either a config problem upstream or a problem
in my BIND validation), but in
Hello.
Not sure this is a question for FreeBSD or for OpenVPN directly... I'll
try here first.
I'm using OpenVPN quite heavily, as I have around 10 server-server
tunnels, and several server-clients installations.
They are all working properly except one, which will periodically start
misbeha
On 7/5/24 11:31, Ronald Klop wrote:
Of course this can be a firewall or routing issue somewhere in between
the hosts blocking traffic from B to A.
Hmm...
The two hosts can communicate with any other protocol.
Also the VPN can handshake, so packets are exchanged correctly.
I'm only using ipfw:
On 7/5/24 16:32, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
However, I just changed UDP port and it seems to work!
The "solution" didn't last: after a little more than 3 hours, this
tunnel stopped working again :(
Strangely restarting openvpn on both sides fixed this, this time.
Or host A has a zombie pr
On 7/6/24 02:17, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
Host A *still* has/had a port open, and that port can lingere
for several reasons, and that can cause issues.
Ok, good, check both A and B.
I had checked this too: neither A nor B had the port still open.
MTU's? Have you manually checked path MTU t
On 7/6/24 17:02, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
Are you pinging the inside or outside address of the vpn?
If you cant even ping the outside IP of a VPN you have
basic connectivity problems that must be fixed before even
attempting a VPN.
I'll recap:
I've got two hosts: A and B, which are in differnt
On 7/6/24 18:13, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hello.
It's almost surely due to a problem with the UDP packets that implement the
VPN: again, according to tcpdump they go out host B, but never reach host A.
Is it remotely possible that one of the ISPs blocks these UDP packets as part
of an autom
On 7/6/24 18:24, Michael Tuexen wrote:
Or are any kind of NAT or Firewall involved which might loose state?
Are you using public addresses on host A and B?
Host B has a public IP address assigned to its "public" interface.
Host A is behind NAT (it has a private IP assigned to its public inter
Hello.
I hope someone can help me with the following problem...
The box runs a 8.3p7/i386 and has three physical ethernet interfaces:
em0, em1 and fxp1.
em0 and em1 are bonded into lagg0, over which carp0 and carp1 run.
fxp0 has three vlans: vlan1, vlan2 and vlan3, over which there are
respect
Hello.
Three days ago I upgraded an amd64 8.3 box to the latest 8.4.
Since then the outside network is misbehaving: large mails are not
sended (although small ones do), svn operations will work for a while,
then come to a sudden stop, etc...
Perhaps the most evident test is "wget"ting a big fil
On 04/17/14 23:45, John Nielsen wrote:
Thanks for answering John.
My first thought was TSO as well, since I've seen the symptoms you describe a
few times on systems running 10.0.
> Do you use IPFW or any kind of NAT on this system?
Yes, I use ipfw to firewall, to divert packets to natd and
On 04/19/14 19:19, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hmmm, sounds a bit complicated... would simply dropping if_em.ko in from
a 8.3 box work?
Ok, I'll answer myself.
I'm now running 8.3's if_em.ko (binary from another system), on an 8.4
kernel.
The behaviour is the same as before.
H
Hello.
This has probably come up several times, however...
I've got a server which has two (or more) interfaces with public IPs.
Let's say, as an example (with fictional IPs):
ifconfig_vlan1="inet 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.248..."
ifconfig_vlan2="inet 2.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.248..."
Of c
On 04/28/14 11:18, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
You could put all the services which are on 2.0.0.2 in a separate fib and
there have another default-route.
Thanks, but unfortunately I can't, since some services must be able to
answer on both addresses.
Maybe I could use socket in one fib to proxy
On 04/28/14 11:16, Dominic Froud wrote:
You want source-based routing.
Thanks, that term will help me in my searches.
I have this situation and I used pf(4) to do it with a rule like:
pass out quick route-to ( vlan2 ) from 2.0.0.0/29 to any no state
As a variation you can give an optiona
On 04/28/14 11:16, Dominic Froud wrote:
On 28/04/2014 09:58, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
I've got a server which has two (or more) interfaces with public IPs.
Let's say, as an example (with fictional IPs):
ifconfig_vlan1="inet 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.248..."
ifconfig
Hello.
Today I experienced something weird (at least for me) on a 8.4 system:
_ the system had vlan3 interface, with default MTU (1500 bytes);
_ "ping -D -s 1400 somehost" would work, but "ping -D -s 1500 somehost"
would yield "frag needed and DF set" (forgive me if the message is not
exact, I
On 06/24/14 21:03, John Hay wrote:
Do a "route get somehost" and see what mtu is returned. You might be
able to delete or tweak that route.
Thanks a lot!
I learned something new :)
I'll try this next time I have the chance.
bye
av.
___
free
On 06/25/14 02:01, Charles Swiger wrote:
Does "ifconfig vlan3 down; ifconfig vlan3 up" do any good?
Or that run against the physical NIC?
Can't try this now, I'll do when I can play again with this box.
What is the ethernet HW
em0@pci0:6:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x10828086 chip=0x107d808
On 06/25/14 15:23, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 06/25/14 02:01, Charles Swiger wrote:
Does "ifconfig vlan3 down; ifconfig vlan3 up" do any good?
Or that run against the physical NIC?
None of the two.
John was right about the route.
bye & Tha
On 06/24/14 21:03, John Hay wrote:
Do a "route get somehost" and see what mtu is returned.
You are right, I see a route with the old, lesser MTU.
You might be able to delete or tweak that route.
How do I do this?
I tried "route delete", but it doesn't help.
bye & Thanks
av.
_
On 07/02/14 04:53, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
How do I do this?
I tried "route delete", but it doesn't help.
route change -mtu XXX
This does not work: the route is deemed as non-existent.
bye & thanks
av.
P.S. I'm writing this more out of curiosity, than of real need; no need
to so
Hello.
Just to say today I upgraded from 8.1 to 8.2 and xl0 stopped working.
It is detected:
xl0: <3Com 3c900B-COMBO Etherlink XL> port 0xd800-0xd87f mem
0xfdefe000-0xfdefe07f irq 17 at device 7.0 on pci1
xl0: selecting 10baseT transceiver, half duplex
xl0: Ethernet address: 00:50:04:22:a9:c0
x
On 11/23/11 19:05, Brian Seklecki (Mobile) wrote:
Send us:
grep ifconfig /etc/rc.conf
ifconfig -a
ifconfig -m
netstat -i
netstat -rn
netstat -i
arp -an
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ne
On 11/23/11 19:05, Brian Seklecki (Mobile) wrote:
Send us:
grep ifconfig /etc/rc.conf
ifconfig -a
ifconfig -m
netstat -i
netstat -rn
netstat -i
arp -an
For both the working and non-working cards to compare.
Sorry for the noise...
I accidentally removed the "media" option from rc.conf and the
Hello.
I recently installed 8.2 with the following card:
> dmesg
> ...
fxp0: port 0xdc00-0xdc3f mem
0xfebfb000-0xfebfbfff,0xfebc-0xfebd irq 20 at device 5.0 on pci4
> ...
> pciconv -lv
> ...
fxp0@pci0:4:5:0:class=0x02 card=0x00408086 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x0c
hdr=0x00
On 12/14/11 20:59, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
AFAIK the firmware of controller has no known TSO issue so it
indicates a bug in driver.
What makes me wonder is ICMP ECHO packet should not be affected by
TSO and I have no clue at this moment.
I wasn't talking about ICMP ECHO.
What happened was:
a) t
On 12/14/11 22:32, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
Wireshark showed some wrong checksums (I believe on the ICMP packet, but
I might remember wrong).
You can check whether you received bad checksummed frames with
netstat(1).
I tried "netstat -ind", but it shows no Ierrs/Idrop/Oerrs/Odrop.
Is simp
On 12/15/11 23:13, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
I tried "netstat -ind", but it shows no Ierrs/Idrop/Oerrs/Odrop.
Use -s option which will show statistics for each network
protocols. Search 'discarded for bad checksums' from the output.
Still all bad counters at zero.
You'll see tso.dump and n
On 12/16/11, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
(Sorry Eugene, I didn't get your message until I searched the web).
> Do you use NAT? man ipfw clearly states:
>
> ipfw nat is not compatible with
> the TCP segmentation offloading (TSO). Thus, to reliably nat
your net-
> work traffic, please di
Hello.
I'm using 7.4p6/i386 and this is (a part of) my configuration
cloned_interfaces="lagg0 vlan1 vlan2 vlan3 carp0 carp1 carp6 carp7 carp9 carp10"
ifconfig_em0="up"
ifconfig_em1="up"
ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto lacp laggport em0 laggport em1 192.168.101.1 netmask
255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_carp0
Hello.
Fast question: are the two above compatible?
Can I use CARP over a lagg interface?
bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebs
Hello.
I have a setup with two FreeBSD 6.3 domain controllers using samba +
openldap + nss_ldap.
The company might be switching to Active Directory soon (not my choice,
before you ask :-), so I might need to reconfigure the two FreeBSD boxes
to become AD members (with winbindd, nss, whatever).
Hello.
I'm curios about something which happened during a test in one of my
networks.
Two FreeBSD 6.3 boxes (one i386, one amd64) share some IP through CARP.
Now, as soon as I plugged a wi-fi bridging access point on the net
(which took it's IP from DHCP only for management), I started to see
Some years ago, I checked to see whether I would be able to let a single
snort process listen on more than one NIC.
At the time it was only possible in Linux.
Now, I searched a bit, but nothing new came up.
Did anything improve since then? Do we still need multiple snort
processes to listen on
Hello.
I've got a 6.3 box in which I needed to use debug.mpsafenet=0 in order
to avoid deadlocks with ipfw uid rules.
I'm thinking of upgrading this to 7.2 and I see the above variable has
gone away. Does this mean it is now safe to use such ipfw rules?
The last things I could find wrt this ma
Hello.
A customer of mine was connecting to a remote WatchGuard box through
their Mobile VPN client.
Now I'd like the server to take over that and le the whole network connect.
Did anyone ever succeded in this? Is it possible?
Should be IPSEC, but anyone has an how-to?
bye & Thanks
av
Hello.
I've a couple of 7.2p7 servers (one i386, the other amd64) which are
working in parallel using CARP.
Recently I bonded two interfaces on the former and CARP stopped working.
Here's the relevant part from rc.conf on the first box:
ifconfig_em0="up"
ifconfig_em1="up"
ifconfig_lagg0="laggp
Hello.
For quite a while, I've been seeing in the logs a lot of messages like
the following:
snort: (snort_decoder) WARNING: IP dgm len < IP Hdr len!
I'm not sure about this, but I suspect they started when I upgraded from
6.3 to 7.2.
Today, while investigating another problem, I decided I ha
Hello.
I'm having problems with 8.0/amd64 with the following card:
a...@pci0:1:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x83041043 chip=0x10261969
rev=0xb0 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Attansic (Now owned by Atheros)'
device = 'PCI-E ETHERNET CONTROLLER (AR8121/AR8113 )'
class = network
Il 07/02/10 00:41, Pyun YongHyeon ha scritto:
Hello.
I'm having problems with 8.0/amd64 with the following card:
a...@pci0:1:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x83041043 chip=0x10261969
rev=0xb0 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Attansic (Now owned by Atheros)'
device = 'PCI-E ETHERNET CONTROL
Hello.
On a couple of 7.2 systems, I've got some carp interfaces build upon a
physical interface (em0 or igb0) and everything works fine.
On both box I've tried aggregating two interfaces (resp. em0+em1 and
igb0+igb1) into a lagg0 interface, using LACP.
However, in this case CARP will stop wo
Hello.
Today a box of mine (8.4p16/amd64) stopped working as a router; I don't
have a clear picture, but the internal nets were working perfectly,
while the external interfaces lagged, dropped connections or stopped
packets from passing.
The box is running pf (for handling multiple Internet
On 09/29/14 20:21, Ermal Luçi wrote:
Probably is better you ask this on freebsd-pf@.
Thanks, I see you have already cc:ed it.
Though this sounds like state limit reached.
Can this happen even if all my pf rules have "no state"?
bye & Thanks
av.
Hello.
This might be a strange idea, but does such a thing exist?
I mean: is there any tool that can show in real-time which dynamic rules
are active, their timers, etc... like top does for processes?
bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-net@freebs
Hello.
I'm having some troubles with dynamic rules and keep-alives...
Let's say a client connect to a TCP port on my server and a keep-state
rules allows the connection; the connection is setup correctly and some
data exchanged.
Then there is some minutes of silence and the rule expires.
H
Hello.
I have a setup where a FreeBSD box is connected to two ADSL routers:
default gateway is set to the first and, in case of failure, is moved to
the other one. This works perfectly for outgoing connections: in the
event of the switch, I'll have to reconnect, but that's acceptable.
The pro
Artyom Viklenko ha scritto:
You have to enforce simmetrical routing on your FreeBSD box.
You can use, for example, PF firewall Using such options and features
as labels and route-to/reply-to statemens.
Also it is possible with ipfw, but I prefer PF. :)
Thanks, this is interesting. However I
Eric F Crist ha scritto:
> The biggest problem one would have with this sort of setup, is the
upstream provider support. I don't know of any ISP's that are going to
be willing or even able to propagate routes for your static IPs through
their DSL systems. If you want that sort of redundancy
Josh Paetzel ha scritto:
errrm, in pf I can give you a concrete example of how to deal with
this.
Thank you very much. Please see also my reply to Artyom.
Your question seemed to imply that you don't want to load-balance or
really even do round-robin NAT and you're fine with manually cutti
Artyom Viklenko ha scritto:
Very brief example (just to show main idea).
Assume you have thre interfaces in router fxp0 - lan, fxp1 - adsl1, fxp2
- adsl2.
fxp0 - 192.168.0.1, fxp1 - 192.168.1.2, fxp2 - 192.168.2.2
adsl1 - 192.168.1.1, adsl2 - 192.168.2.1
$server="192.168.0.2"
$adsl1="192.16
After portupgrading two samba servers, I cannot connect any more to them
through mount_smbfs. Connecting from Windows works fine.
Am I the only one who is experiencing this problem?
bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
Per olof Ljungmark ha scritto:
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
After portupgrading two samba servers, I cannot connect any more to
them through mount_smbfs. Connecting from Windows works fine.
Am I the only one who is experiencing this problem?
No, we are at least two :-)
Ok, thanks.
Any hint on
Hello.
A box of mine has an interface configured with two IPs on two different
nets:
# ifconfig
xl0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
options=9
inet 192.168.2.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
ether 00:50:
Hello.
I've got a new box which features two gigabit ports and I though I'd try
lagg with LACP.
On the box I put the following in /etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_em0="up"
ifconfig_em1="up"
ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto lacp laggport em0 laggport em1 192.168.100.101
netmask 255.255.255.0"
Then I aggreg
Gary Palmer ha scritto:
Does the switch have spanning tree enabled?
Yes.
Should it be?
bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL
Hello,
I've got a problem I cannot understand and hope someone can help me.
I've got a machine which must firewall a whole class C subnet.
The upstream router (100Mb/s fiber connection) is configured as xxx.xxx.xxx.254, so
I've chosen xxx.xxx.xxx.1 for my
box and bridge with the other xxx.xxx.xxx
** Reply to note from "Chris Dionissopoulos[freemail]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 31 Aug
2004 07:01:11 +0300
> Andrea,
> Try something like this as alternative configuration:
Thank you very much for the answer. Unfortunately I didn't want to mess remotely with
this kind of configuration, so I
Hello.
A box of mine, which acts as firewall/bridge, is experiencing frequent
panics.
As said in the subject line, it's a 4.10-RELEASE-p4 with ipfw2 enabled
in the kernel.
I've run through post mortem kernel analisys and found out that the
crashes are always related to ipfw2; specifically I get:
pa
Hello.
I noticed that when I issue "sh /etc/rc.firewall" to reload firewall
rules from a remote console, I get disconnected (as I would expect) and
locked out!
The problems seems to be that "ipfw -f" prints: "command is /usr/local/...".
This is in /usr/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c:
fprintf(stderr, "com
Hello.
I have two FreeBSD 4.11 boxes which have been using freevrrpd for a long
time. Today I upgraded from 0.8.7 to 0.9.3 and since then I started
having some problems.
Specifically I started to see this messages on both boxes:
freevrrpd[822]: ip ttl of vrrp packet isn't set to 255. Packet
On 08/13/17 15:43, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
Thanks a lot! That looks exactly like what I need. However, when I was
checking the lagg configuration a few years ago, at that time it wasn't
possible to set up a lagg with WiFi. Has anything changed (fairly)
recently?
Don't know about history, but I
Hello.
As per subject, I'm building a new box which must host a jail running a
Samba AD, but I have trouble provisioning it.
Currently I'm trying samba44.
I read a lot of material and I think I understand the problem: it seems
the "samba-tool provision" script is incompatible with NFSv4ACL us
On 11/02/17 08:09, Alexander Zagrebin wrote:
В Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:01:18 +0100
Andrea Venturoli пишет:
It seems it's offtopic here, but I'll try to answer.
Doh!
I was going to write to -port, but wrote -net in the end...
Sorry!
To setup a new samba46-based domain controller
Hello.
I've got the following setup:
re0: 192.168.x.1 (main IP)
192.168.x.2 (jail)
192.168.x.3 (jail)
192.168.x.4 (jail)
tap0: VM-bhyve VM (using 192.168.x.9)
bridge0: connecting re0 and tap0.
The VM used to work properly.
Now, however, I've got the network cable temporarily d
On 11/16/17 19:01, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
If you add an interface to a bridge, you should remove all IP addresses from it
and assign them to the bridge itself instead. And you will be fine.
Thanks.
In fact, assigning the base IP and all the jails to bridge0, instead of
re0 solved.
I still th
On 11/24/17 10:52, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
Hi,
The VM IP is assigned to the emulated interface inside the guest OS
(e.g. vtnet0).
It would not make sense to assign an IP to tap0, and I'm quite sure
bhyve doesn't do that.
Right.
Sorry for having expressed this with wrong wording.
bye & T
Hello.
I'm trying to find out how dyn_keepalive works.
From ipfw(8):
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_keepalive: 1
Enables generation of keepalive packets for keep-state rules on
TCP sessions. A keepalive is generated to both sides of the con-
nection every 5 seco
On 04/03/18 12:54, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 03.04.2018 13:45, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Can anybody give any hint about the above behaviours or point me to good
documentation? The man pages is very brief on this, unfortunately.
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
ipfw uses M_SKIP_FIREWALL flag
Hello.
Let's say I have a router connected to the Internet on one side and to a
LAN with private IPs on the other.
I want some clients from outside to be able to connect to a TCP service
on a machine on the LAN: they should connect to port X on the firewall's
public IP and reach port Y on the
On 05/19/18 03:10, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
You don't need any additional software at all.
Just instruct FreeBSD kernel to do what you need, it will do that just fine.
Thanks.
In fact I've used ipfw nat in the past, but I'd rather use a userland
daemon: doing things at rule level makes it more
On 05/19/18 00:08, Reshad Patuck wrote:
Hi,
If you are running pf or ipfw on your router you could use a forward
rule to forward connections that come in on a certain internet IP and
port to a select internal IP or port.
Thanks.
I'm in fact using ipfw, but already have quite a complex rule s
On 05/21/18 13:16, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2018 23:29:33 +0200
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Does anyone have a good suggestion for a program similar to the above ones?
I require nothing fancy, I just want it to be reliable.
The oldest, the simplest, the most reliable (I'm
On 05/21/18 18:10, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Thanks to anyone who answered.
I'm currently trying net/bounce, as suggested by Eugene.
If that won't work properly, I'll sure give plugdaemon a shot.
Just an update in case anyone is interested...
Bounce is still dying occasionally;
tting must be done on boot and cannot
be enabled later or something like that?
For wishmaster:
Since you said it works for you, can I ask which FreeBSD version you
tested this on? Do you have any other patch or specific setup? How did
you test this?
Thanks a lot to anyone
Andrea Vent
On 10/4/18 3:07 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
At the root of this problem is the community's long resistance to having
data reported back to the project data about the machines running FreeBSD.
Absent any real and significant data, the only way to know if things are
unused is to ask. We cannot have the
Hello.
I've been using CARP for years and I'm only getting troubles since a
week or so.
My setup is as follows:
|re0=10.1.2.13/10.1.2.127 fw1 fxp0=192.168.124.3|
|client re0=10.1.2.18| ---
--- |192.168.124.1 router
Hello.
I'm using "ipfw nat" on several 10.3 boxes, but I have some questions.
Let's start with a simple one: how do I list configured NATs and their
details?
I know I can configure a NAT with "ipfw nat 1 config ...", but how do I
show what I did?
Second question:
_ if I issue "ipfw nat 2
On 03/08/17 18:03, Freddie Cash wrote:
It's listed in the EXAMPLES section of the ipfw(8) man page.
ipfw nat show config <-- view config for all nat instances
ipfw nat 123 show config <-- view config for nat 123
ipfw nat 111-999 show<-- view logs for nat 111-999
Oops!!!
Been working
On 03/30/17 05:22, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Anyone experienced with OpenVPN on FreeBSD?
What would be the best way to policy route a network into OpenVPN? A
routing decision must be based on the src IP address, not the dst IP
address.
Imagine an OpenVPN client with 3 interfaces:
On 03/30/17 09:46, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Will "ipfw fwd" do the trick? I could "ipfw fwd" the packets into the
tun0 interface, but will OpenVPN understand that?
Never tried this, sorry.
bye
av.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https
On 08/13/17 13:47, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
On my laptop I have two interfaces, wlan0 (WiFi) and ue0 (LAN).
Obviously LAN is faster but not always connected. Is there any way to
tell the system to use LAN interface in preference to the other?
You mean:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-
On 2019-10-29 03:57, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Is is possible to have two or more /etc/exports files, using different names of
course?
While I cannot answer your question...
One possible scenario is having one exports file for NFS 4 and one for NFS3,
for clients that don't support NFS 4?
..
Hello.
Running 11.3, is there any risk or downside in enabling this?
I cannot reach my homebanking otherwise; I think either the bank has
completely disabled ICMP or some router in between filters it.
I see it's not enabled by default: is it just out of precaution?
bye & Thanks
av.
Hello.
I've been using jails for years with ezjail. Now I'm trying to
experiment with VNET.
I've looked for a tutorial, but found scarce (and possibly outdated) info.
Box is a 12.1/amd64.
Basic configuration involves wlan0 configured via DHCP (192.168.133.26).
Host networking works.
For a st
On 10/21/20 12:19 PM, Goran Mekić wrote:
Did you setup NAT?
No.
Should I?
Why?
The IP I gave to the jail is in the same subnet as the host.
BTW, I have similar (working) setups with bhyve (using tap instead of
epair) and I didn't setup NAT there.
bye & Thanks
av.
__
On 10/21/20 12:20 PM, Kristof Provost wrote:
This is your problem. You can’t bridge over wifi interfaces.
> That’s a limitation of station mode wifi.
I had the suspect...
Is this documented somewhere? Is this a bug or feature?
Try routing, or try with a wired interface.
I'll try and get
Hello.
I've got a 12.2/amd64 desktop pc with the following on the motherboard:
re0: port
0xe000-0xe0ff mem 0xf7404000-0xf7404fff,0xf740-0xf7403fff irq 33 at device 0.0 on
pci4
Unfortunately it's not easy to plug a new PCI NIC into it, and since re0
tends to hang on load, I'm using the
On 6/8/21 9:16 AM, Alex Dupre wrote:
Just to be sure, have you recompiled the kernel module with the same
sources as the new debug kernel?
Sure!
If so, probably the best location to open a bug report might be here:
https://github.com/kostikbel/rere/issues
Done!
bye & Thanks
av.
Hello.
I've set up a network with CARP and I think I'm seeing something strange.
What follows is a simplified setup (the real one involves lagg and vlan,
but this should not matter).
I have a Zyxel managed switch,
two "servers":
- A 192.168.0.1
- B 192.168.0.2
and two "clients"
- C 192.168.0.
On 2/12/22 13:38, Michael Gmelin wrote:
Maybe the switch or something it’s connected to uses vrrp?
The switch has no options about VRRP, AFAICT (unless it can be called by
a different name) and I don't think any other device could use VRRP.
When using vhid 1, can you see any vrrp traf
On 2/13/22 05:34, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
This is absolutely not normal. VHID 1 usually acts the same as the other
VHIDs. I also suspect your switch.
What is even stranger is that:
_ if I boot with VHID 10, then add a different IP with VHID 1, I see
both MACs in the switch database;
_
On 2/13/22 11:17, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hi, if source address of the SYN-ACK reply between [C|D] -> carpIP is
.3/0:0:5e:00:01:01,
Not sure I understand. What's .3?
(mac adress learning limit
set for the port(s) in question?!?).
There's scarcely 10 entries in the whole MAC database
On 2/13/22 11:51, Michael Gmelin wrote:
According to their web site, some of their switches have support (don’t know your
model) under IP Application > VRRP > Configuration.
No such thing here (it's a GS1900-24E).
Good luck getting to the bottom of this!
Thanks.
I could give up VHID
On 2/13/22 12:20, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
I could give up VHID 1 and just use any other number, but, at least
initially, I'll try and check with the vendor out of curiosity.
Just for the record: I opened a ticket with Zyxel a month ago and got
practically no answer yet.
bye
av.
Hello.
I'd like to share some thought on what happened to me: I had an external ADSL modem
from
Alcatel connected (with a straight cable, since the device has a reversed ethernet
port) to
a RealTek card on a FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE box.
I used the simple line in rc.conf:
ifconfig_
** Reply to note from Clark Gaylord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:46:06 -0500
> It used to be the case that mediaopt half-duplex worked. It stopped
> working at some point (I don't recall exactly when ... somewhere
> between 4.0 and 4.2 I think),
So this IS a bug.
> but
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
