Hi,
I've got a 10.1 box with a couple of Intel(R) PRO/1000 (82571EB) cards in
it, e.g.
"
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=4019b
...
"
I've set these up as a fail-over lagg interface, lagg0:
"
lagg0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=4019b
...
inet y.y.y.y
...
laggproto failover
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199174
--- Comment #25 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to david.keller from comment #23)
Ah, is this an NFS test or a raw iperf test? I still need to take care of
something that Rick M. asked me to do.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Karl Pielorz wrote this message on Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 14:04 +0100:
> This works fine. If I add a VLAN now to that, I end up with:
>
> "
> lagg0.10: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
> 1496
> ...
> inet x.x.x.x
> ...
> vlan: 60 parent interface: lagg0
> "
>
>
> The MTU on lagg0.10 has shrunk by
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199174
--- Comment #26 from david.kel...@litchis.fr ---
(In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #25)
So far, it only happened when NFS mount was stressed (torrent traffic).
I didn't manage to reproduce using iperf.
It doesn't seems to me directly rel
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199174
--- Comment #27 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to david.keller from comment #26)
ok, good to know. I have an idea of what to do thanks to Rick. Let me test
some things and try to reproduce fail/fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because
Hello,
should ./kipfw and another ./kipfw work?
I want to have two filtered kipfw instances sharing the same WAN port.
So far I did a quick test lab and it worked, but since it's a lab
environment I don't know if I should expect other problems when I add it to
run in a real scenario.
What p
Hello!
You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of
kipfw on each pair:
kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0
kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1
And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux netmap).
On Friday, July 10, 2015, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> Hell
You should run netmap-ipfw with this command (it will run 8 copies of
kipfw):
for i in `seq 0 7`; do IPFW_PORT="555$i" taskset -c $i kipfw
netmap:eth0-$i netmap:eth1-$i & done
When you need add or remove rule you should do it for all 8 copies of kipfw:
for i in `seq 0 7`;do IPFW_PORT="555$i" ipfw/
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of
> kipfw on each pair:
> kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0
> kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1
>
> And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov
> wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of
> > kipfw on each pair:
> > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0
> > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199174
--- Comment #28 from david.kel...@litchis.fr ---
(In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #27)
I can try to help, could you elaborate on what Rick M. told you ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov > >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of
>> > kipfw on eac
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov <
>>> pavel.odint...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello!
>>>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Eduardo Meyer
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Od
14 matches
Mail list logo
