On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odint...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello! > > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of > kipfw on each pair: > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1 > > And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux > netmap). > Wow cool hint and cool numbers. I will get everything properly bridged on both kipfw instances, right? I need to simulate like a 3-port bridge... this would me more like kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix2-0 But I need the same traffic coming on the wire on ix0 to be available on both ix1 and ix2. Will that work like that? I only tried using the default q. > > > On Friday, July 10, 2015, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.me...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> should ./kipfw <port0> <port1> and another ./kipfw <port0> <port2> work? >> >> I want to have two filtered kipfw instances sharing the same WAN port. >> >> So far I did a quick test lab and it worked, but since it's a lab >> environment I don't know if I should expect other problems when I add it >> to >> run in a real scenario. >> >> What problems should I expect? Can they be minimized? >> >> Basic stateless filtering only. >> >> -- >> =========== >> Eduardo Meyer >> pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com >> profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >> > > > -- > Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov > -- =========== Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.me...@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmac...@saude.gov.br _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
