Old Synopsis: pf + tap keep state problem
New Synopsis: [pf] [tap] pf + tap keep state problem
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jan 14 08:44:16 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé
wrote:
>
> Now I reach to use it on -current and, following your advice, on 9.1 too.
> The patch (for 9.1-release) that I've used his here:
> http://gugus69.free.fr/freebsd/freebsd.netmap.patch
>
Hi,
I've just discovered that on i386 (no pro
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Ok, I got some details. It's an DFE-520TX (/C1 or rev. C1). I crafted an
patch attached, but whenever kldloading the modified if_vr, I got this:
[...]
I also tried to apply VR_Q_NE
On Sunday, January 13, 2013 1:15:13 am Bryan Venteicher wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "John Baldwin"
> > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> > Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "Peter Jeremy"
> >
> > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 9:39:17 AM
> > Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
> >
> > On
On Monday, January 14, 2013 6:52:18 am Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15:
> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> >> Ok, I got some details. It's an DFE-520TX (/C1 or rev. C1). I crafted an
> >> patch attached, but whenever kl
The constants used for TCP and UDP socket options (TCP_NODELAY, etc.) are
currently defined as hex values that are individual bits. However, socket
options are never masked together, they are used as a simple enumeration of
discrete values. Using a bitmask forces us to run out of bits and make
I was looking at TCP congestion control at work recently and noticed a few
"odd" things in the current code. First, there is this chunk of code in
cc_ack_received() in tcp_input.c:
static void inline
cc_ack_received(struct tcpcb *tp, struct tcphdr *th, uint16_t type)
{
INP_WLOCK_ASSERT(
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:07:50PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, January 13, 2013 1:15:13 am Bryan Venteicher wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "John Baldwin"
> > > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> > > Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , "Peter Jeremy"
> > >
> > > Sent: Friday,
Wouldn't a comment over the code suffice?
Something like your email as a header would actually work very nicely!
I think just using decimal would be more confusing than explicitly
calling it out like:
/* begin enumerated (not bitmask) socket option specifiers */
#define TCP_MAXSEG 0x02
On Monday, January 14, 2013 4:42:16 pm Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Wouldn't a comment over the code suffice?
>
> Something like your email as a header would actually work very nicely!
>
> I think just using decimal would be more confusing than explicitly
> calling it out like:
>
> /* begin enumer
On Monday, January 14, 2013 4:07:56 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:07:50PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 13, 2013 1:15:13 am Bryan Venteicher wrote:
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "John Baldwin"
> > > > To: freebsd-net@freebs
- Original Message -
> From: "John Baldwin"
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Cc: "Konstantin Belousov" , "Bryan Venteicher"
> , "Peter Jeremy"
>
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:57:58 PM
> Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
>
> On Monday, January 14, 2013 4:07:56 pm Konstantin Belouso
On 1/14/13 4:56 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, January 14, 2013 4:42:16 pm Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Wouldn't a comment over the code suffice?
Something like your email as a header would actually work very nicely!
I think just using decimal would be more confusing than explicitly
calling it
Change "Don't imply TCP and UDP socket options are bitmasks" to "Don't
infer TCP and UDP socket options are bitmasks"
- M
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On 1/14/13 4:56 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, January 14, 2013 4:42:16 pm Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>>
>>
John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 14, 2013 6:52:18 am Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> >
> > http://s2.postimage.org/9nvkrlpqx/IMAG1040.jpg
> > http://s2.postimage.org/4qi06hnrt/IMAG1041.jpg
>
> Did your cards come in a box with a driver CD? The manual I found online
> claimed the CD con
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 05:30:53PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, January 14, 2013 6:52:18 am Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> > >
> > > http://s2.postimage.org/9nvkrlpqx/IMAG1040.jpg
> > > http://s2.postimage.org/4qi06hnrt/IMAG1041.jpg
> >
> > Did your cards
The following reply was made to PR kern/175182; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ingo Flaschberger
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, pro...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/175182: [panic] kernel panic on RADIX_MPATH when deleting
route
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 03:28:30 +0100
This is a multi-part
The following reply was made to PR kern/175182; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ingo Flaschberger
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, pro...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/175182: [panic] kernel panic on RADIX_MPATH when deleting
route
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 03:36:05 +0100
This is a multi-part
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:52:18PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15:
> >On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> >>Ok, I got some details. It's an DFE-520TX (/C1 or rev. C1). I crafted an
> >>patch attached, but whenever kl
Old Synopsis: will there miss a FIN when do TSO?
New Synopsis: [tcp] will there miss a FIN when do TSO?
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jan 15 03:10:22 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
ht
John Baldwin wrote on 15.01.2013 00:15:
On Monday, January 14, 2013 6:52:18 am Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Ok, I got some details. It's an DFE-520TX (/C1 or rev. C1). I crafted an
pa
YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 06:44:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:52:18PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Ok, I got some details. It's an DFE-520TX (/C1 or rev. C1). I crafted
YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 06:44:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:52:18PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Ok, I got some details. It's an DFE-520TX (/C1 or rev. C1). I crafted
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:32:06AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 06:44:
> >On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:52:18PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> >>YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15:
> >>>On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhano
YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 10:40:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:32:06AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 06:44:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:52:18PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:47:38AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 10:40:
> >On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:32:06AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> >>YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 06:44:
> >>>On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:52:18PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhano
27 matches
Mail list logo
