On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé <oliv...@cochard.me> wrote:
> > Now I reach to use it on -current and, following your advice, on 9.1 too. > The patch (for 9.1-release) that I've used his here: > http://gugus69.free.fr/freebsd/freebsd.netmap.patch > Hi, I've just discovered that on i386 (no problem on amd64) I meet a fatal trap once I start pkt-gen: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x62e fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0bd80da stack pointer = 0x28:0xcd95688c frame pointer = 0x28:0xcd9568c8 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 1645 (pkt-gen) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xc096aba0 at kdb_backtrace+0x50 #1 0xc0935f32 at panic+0x152 #2 0xc0bc1852 at trap_fatal+0x262 #3 0xc0bc1b3b at trap_pfault+0x1ab #4 0xc0bc29dd at trap+0x3bd #5 0xc0bab57c at calltrap+0x6 #6 0xc0682a31 at lem_init_locked+0x701 #7 0xc0685594 at lem_netmap_reg+0xe4 #8 0xc0797ede at netmap_ioctl+0xafe #9 0xc08b6d85 at devfs_ioctl_f+0x75 #10 0xc097ca35 at kern_ioctl+0xc5 #11 0xc097ccc5 at sys_ioctl+0xc5 #12 0xc0bc2300 at syscall+0x520 #13 0xc0bab5e1 at Xint0x80_syscall+0x21 I'm agree that compiling an i386 kernel with netmap is a strange idea :-) Regards, Olivier _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
