cloned_interfaces="tap0 tap1 tap2 tap3 tap4 tap5 tap6 tap7 tap8 tap9"
ifconfig_tap0=147.28.224.41/30
ifconfig_tap1=147.28.224.45/30
ifconfig_tap2=147.28.224.49/30
ifconfig_tap3=147.28.224.53/30
ifconfig_tap4=147.28.224.57/30
ifconfig_tap5=147.28.224.61/30
ifconfig_tap6=147.28.224.65/30
ifconfig_tap
On 1/31/11 11:43 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
1/ wow does that (dynamips ciscos) actually run on BSD?
yep
2/ "why?"
so we can have a routing research topology testbed of real cisco and
real juniper code.
first you need to create them right?
ifconfig tap0 create 192.168.3.1/28 up
I think you do:
i
2011/2/1 Randy Bush
> cloned_interfaces="*bridge0* tap0 tap1 tap2 tap3 tap4 tap5 tap6 tap7 tap8
> tap9"
> ifconfig_tap0=147.28.224.41/30
> ifconfig_tap1=147.28.224.45/30
> ifconfig_tap2=147.28.224.49/30
> ifconfig_tap3=147.28.224.53/30
> ifconfig_tap4=147.28.224.57/30
> ifconfig_tap5=147.28.224.6
Hi Randy,
I believe this may help(found in /etc/defaults/rc.conf):
#autobridge_interfaces="bridge0"# List of bridges to check
#autobridge_bridge0="tap* em0"# Interface glob to automatically add
to the bridge
if used in addition to example below.
//batcilla
2011/2/1 Randy Bush
>> gets me no bridge. do i need a cloned interface for it?
> Yes, it should be in cloned_interfaces list.
works perfectly. thank you!!
randy
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe,
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD Current (201010) as guest in VirtualBox on an
Ubuntu 10.04. FreeBSD is compiled with VIMAGE option.
I loaded a module (my own) that calls if_alloc(IFT_IEEE80211), but I
get a panic:
Kernel page fault with the following non-sleepable locks held:
exclusive rw ifnet_rw (ifn
On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:53:36 am Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 31.01.2011 22:46, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> >># gdb kernel
> >> GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> >> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> >> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
> >> are
> >
On Monday, January 31, 2011 9:40:09 pm Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 02/01/11 04:17, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Somewhat related fallout to the bug reported on security@ recently, I think
> > this KASSERT() in tcp_output() is bogus:
> >
> >
> > KASSERT(len + hdrlen + ipoptlen == m_length(m, NULL
On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:38:16 am Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running FreeBSD Current (201010) as guest in VirtualBox on an
> Ubuntu 10.04. FreeBSD is compiled with VIMAGE option.
>
> I loaded a module (my own) that calls if_alloc(IFT_IEEE80211), but I
> get a panic:
Did you
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD Current (201010) as guest in VirtualBox on an
Ubuntu 10.04. FreeBSD is compiled with VIMAGE option.
I loaded a module (my own) that calls if_alloc(IFT_IEEE80211), but I
get a panic:
see discussions and patch on freebsd-v
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:49 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:38:16 am Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running FreeBSD Current (201010) as guest in VirtualBox on an
>> Ubuntu 10.04. FreeBSD is compiled with VIMAGE option.
>>
>> I loaded a module (my own) that c
call+0x4c
Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xe2
--- syscall (98, FreeBSD ELF64, connect), rip = 0x80072934c, rsp =
0x7fffe9d8, rbp = 0x3 ---
/bz
References:
[1] http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20110201-01-tcpconnect-ipopt.diff
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:49 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:38:16 am Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD Current (201010) as guest in VirtualBox on an
Ubuntu 10.04. FreeBSD is compiled with VIMAGE option.
On 31.01.2011 14:20, Julian Elischer wrote:
> replace with:
>
> 3504if ((hook == NULL) ||
> 3505NG_HOOK_NOT_VALID(hook) ||
> ((peer = NG_HOOK_PEER(hook)) == NULL) ||
> 3506NG_HOOK_NOT_VALID(peer) ||
> ((peernode
On 02.02.2011 00:30, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> cpuid = 3; apic id = 06
> fault virtual address = 0x63
> fault code = supervisor read data, page not present
> instruction pointer = 0x20:0x803d4ccd
> stack pointer =
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:30:20AM +0600, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
E> On 31.01.2011 14:20, Julian Elischer wrote:
E>
E> > replace with:
E> >
E> > 3504if ((hook == NULL) ||
E> > 3505NG_HOOK_NOT_VALID(hook) ||
E> > ((peer = NG_HOOK_PEER(hook)) == NULL)
On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:30:20 pm Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 31.01.2011 14:20, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > replace with:
> >
> > 3504if ((hook == NULL) ||
> > 3505NG_HOOK_NOT_VALID(hook) ||
> > ((peer = NG_HOOK_PEER(hook)) == NULL) ||
> >
On 02.02.2011 00:50, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> This looks like ng_pppoe_disconnect() was called with NULL argument.
>
> Can you add KDB_TRACE option to kernel? Your boxes for some reason can't
> dump core, but with this option we will have at least trace.
Of course. I was pretty sure I have this op
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 08:10 -0800, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 1/23/2011 10:21 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > On 1/21/2011 4:21 AM, Jan Koum wrote:
> > One other thing I noticed is that when the nic is in its hung state, the
> > WOL option is gone ?
> >
> > e.g
> >
> > em1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
>
At this point I'm open to any ideas, this sounds like a good one Sean,
thanks.
Mike, you want to test this ?
Jack
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 08:10 -0800, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > On 1/23/2011 10:21 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > > On 1/21/2011 4:21 AM,
On 2/1/2011 3:05 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> At this point I'm open to any ideas, this sounds like a good one Sean,
> thanks.
> Mike, you want to test this ?
Sure, I am feeling lucky ;-) If someone generates the appropriate em
diffs for me, I will apply on the box that sees this issue the most.
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 12:05 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> At this point I'm open to any ideas, this sounds like a good one Sean,
> thanks.
> Mike, you want to test this ?
>
> Jack
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Sean Bruno
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 08:10 -0800, Mik
Looks good, except I don't like code #if 0'd out, I'll make an if_em.c to
try and
send it shortly.
Jack
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 12:05 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > At this point I'm open to any ideas, this sounds like a good one Sean,
> > thank
Mike, just to remind me, are you running these 82574 adapters with MSIX ?
Jack
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Looks good, except I don't like code #if 0'd out, I'll make an if_em.c to
> try and
> send it shortly.
>
> Jack
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Sean Brun
On 2/1/2011 3:55 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Mike, just to remind me, are you running these 82574 adapters with MSIX ?
Yes. Board is an Intel MB (S3420GPX). 8G RAM, AMD64. Kernel from a few
days ago
0(backup3)# vmstat -i | grep em1
irq257: em1:rx 0 113712958159
irq258: em1:tx 0
But you aren't defining EM_MULTIQUEUE are you? (its not on by default)
Jack
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 2/1/2011 3:55 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Mike, just to remind me, are you running these 82574 adapters with MSIX ?
>
> Yes. Board is an Intel MB (S3420GPX). 8G RAM
Hey net@,
I have a FreeBSD 8.2-RC2 system running on a HP DL180 G6, using the
onboard Intel controller, and it is our primary Bacula storage node and
director node.
We have 96 clients that are scheduled to run at 8:30pm. After about 9 -
10 minutes of activity (mrtg graphs show about 50-60MB/
On 2/1/2011 4:17 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> But you aren't defining EM_MULTIQUEUE are you? (its not on by default)
Nope. Everything is the default wrt to the em driver. Nothing odd in
loader.conf
0(backup3)% grep -v ^# /boot/loader.conf
ahci_load="YES"
siis_load="YES"
if_em_load="YES"
coretemp_load=
On 2/1/2011 4:43 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> To those who are going to test, here is the if_em.c, based on head, with my
> changes, I have to leave for the afternoon, and have not had a chance to
> build
> this, but it should work. I will check back in the later evening.
>
> Any blatant problems Sean,
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 13:43 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> To those who are going to test, here is the if_em.c, based on head,
> with my
> changes, I have to leave for the afternoon, and have not had a chance
> to build
> this, but it should work. I will check back in the later evening.
>
> Any blatan
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 13:51 -0800, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 2/1/2011 4:43 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > To those who are going to test, here is the if_em.c, based on head, with my
> > changes, I have to leave for the afternoon, and have not had a chance to
> > build
> > this, but it should work. I will
Hi there!
After a few hours of reading list archives and source code I need some
clarification on the current state of FreeBSD forwarding capabilities.
Given the following setup:
- Quad Core CPU
- Intel 82576 NIC (igb)
- 8.2-RELEASE
- Router with BGP full table
1) Queues:
Card and driver seem to
eeBSD ELF64, connect), rip = 0x80072934c, rsp =
0x7fffe9d8, rbp = 0x3 ---
/bz
References:
[1] http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20110201-01-tcpconnect-ipopt.diff
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:51:37PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 2/1/2011 4:43 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > To those who are going to test, here is the if_em.c, based on head, with my
> > changes, I have to leave for the afternoon, and have not had a chance to
> > build
> > this, but it should work.
On 01.02.2011 14:29, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, January 31, 2011 9:40:09 pm Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 02/01/11 04:17, John Baldwin wrote:
Somewhat related fallout to the bug reported on security@ recently, I think
What was the bug reported to security@?
this KASSERT() in tcp_output() i
On 2/1/2011 7:56 PM, Chris Peiffer wrote:
>
> Did this get sent to the list? I didn't get this quoted message and I
> can't find it in the archives.
>
> If someone could post the current revision of if_em.c that would be
> great; we are also very eager to test.
>
Strange, it seems to be eaten
On 2/1/2011 8:44 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> % md5 if_em.c
> MD5 (if_em.c) = 0f2d48c7734496c2262f468cd1ab9117
Sorry, thats
MD5 (if_em.c) = 9cede4ab0d833e0f97172ed715e2b4e3
---Mike
--
---
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, m...@sentex.net
Providing I
On 2/1/2011 5:03 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 13:43 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> To those who are going to test, here is the if_em.c, based on head,
>> with my
>> changes, I have to leave for the afternoon, and have not had a chance
>> to build
>> this, but it should work. I will ch
Old Synopsis: Kernel module bridgestp.ko missing after upgrade (if_bridge.ko
depend on it)
New Synopsis: [bridge] Kernel module bridgestp.ko missing after upgrade
(if_bridge.ko depend on it)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Change
To those who are going to test, here is the if_em.c, based on head, with my
changes, I have to leave for the afternoon, and have not had a chance to
build
this, but it should work. I will check back in the later evening.
Any blatant problems Sean, feel free to fix them :)
Jack
On Tue, Feb 1, 20
On 2 February 2011 02:11, Markus Oestreicher wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> After a few hours of reading list archives and source code I need some
> clarification on the current state of FreeBSD forwarding capabilities.
>
> Given the following setup:
> - Quad Core CPU
> - Intel 82576 NIC (igb)
> - 8.2-REL
On 02.02.2011 05:11, Markus Oestreicher wrote:
> 2) Fastforwarding vs multiple netisr:
> In the past (6.x) using fastforwarding=1 was the best option for dedicated
> routers.
> I found "multiple netisr" added to 8.0. Can that help with routing on
> multiple cores?
Yes, it allows more even distr
On 2/1/11 10:10 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On 02.02.2011 05:11, Markus Oestreicher wrote:
2) Fastforwarding vs multiple netisr:
In the past (6.x) using fastforwarding=1 was the best option for dedicated
routers.
I found "multiple netisr" added to 8.0. Can that help with routing on multiple
co
43 matches
Mail list logo
