rihad wrote:
The change definitely helped! There are now more than 3200 users online,
460-500 mbps net traffic load, and normally 10-60 (up to 150 once or
twice) consistent drops per second as opposed to several hundred up to
1000-1500 packets dropped per second before the rebuild. What's
i
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, rihad wrote:
P.S.: BTW, there's a small admin-type inconsistency in FreeBSD 7.1:
/etc/rc.firewall gets executed before values set by /etc/sysctl.conf are in
effect, so "queue 2000" isn't allowed in ipfw pipe rules (as
net.inet.ip.dummynet.pipe_slot_limit is only 100 by de
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, rihad wrote:
Just rebooted with the "ifp->if_snd.ifq_drv_maxlen = 1024;" kernel, all ok
so far. There's currenlty only 1000 or so entries in the ipfw table and
around 350-400 net mbps load, so I'll wait a few hours for the numbers to
grow to >2000 and 460-480 respectively
The following reply was made to PR kern/137776; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "O.Herold"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, f...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/137776: [rum] panic in rum(4) driver on 8.0-BETA2
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:38:35 +0200
Hi,
there is a fix for this kind of bug.
Julian Elischer wrote:
rihad wrote:
The change definitely helped! There are now more than 3200 users
online, 460-500 mbps net traffic load, and normally 10-60 (up to 150
once or twice) consistent drops per second as opposed to several
hundred up to 1000-1500 packets dropped per second befor
rihad wrote:
Just rebooted with the "ifp->if_snd.ifq_drv_maxlen = 1024;" kernel, all
ok so far. There's currenlty only 1000 or so entries in the ipfw table
and around 350-400 net mbps load, so I'll wait a few hours for the
numbers to grow to >2000 and 460-480 respectively and see if the drops
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, rihad wrote:
P.S.: BTW, there's a small admin-type inconsistency in FreeBSD 7.1:
/etc/rc.firewall gets executed before values set by /etc/sysctl.conf
are in effect, so "queue 2000" isn't allowed in ipfw pipe rules (as
net.inet.ip.dummynet.pipe_slot_l
On 2009-Oct-04 18:47:23 +0500, rihad wrote:
>Hi, we have around 500-600 mbit/s traffic flowing through a 7.1R Dell
>PowerEdge w/ 2 GigE bce cards. There are currently around 4 thousand ISP
>users online limited by dummynet pipes of various speeds. According to
>netstat -s output around 500-1000
rihad wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
rihad wrote:
The change definitely helped! There are now more than 3200 users
online, 460-500 mbps net traffic load, and normally 10-60 (up to 150
once or twice) consistent drops per second as opposed to several
hundred up to 1000-1500 packets dropped pe
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Martin Garon wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I need to implement AutoIP in my embedded FW that uses a snapshot of FreeBSD
> 4.4 network stack.
>
>
>
> I could not find any support for it in the latest development cvs tree. Any
> chance it is somewhere that I missed?
>
>
>
> I
Hi Robert,
Apologies for not getting earlier.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Robert N. M. Watson
wrote:
>
> Looks like a NULL pointer dereference, so perhaps a more traditional bug --
> could you convert ifindex_alloc_locked+0x71 to a line of code? You can do
> this using kgdb on the kernel sy
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2009-Oct-04 18:47:23 +0500, rihad wrote:
Hi, we have around 500-600 mbit/s traffic flowing through a 7.1R
Dell PowerEdge w/ 2 GigE bce cards. There are currently around 4
thousand ISP users online limited by dummynet pipes of various
speeds. According to netstat -s output
Harsha wrote:
Hi Robert,
Apologies for not getting earlier.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Robert N. M. Watson
wrote:
Looks like a NULL pointer dereference, so perhaps a more traditional bug --
could you convert ifindex_alloc_locked+0x71 to a line of code? You can do
this using kgdb on the
13 matches
Mail list logo
