Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:21:17AM +0400, rihad wrote:
And if I _only_ want to shape IP traffic to given speed, without
prioritizing anything, do I still need queues? This was the whole point.
No you don't. I'm using pipes without queues extensively to simulate
WANs withou
rihad wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:21:17AM +0400, rihad wrote:
And if I _only_ want to shape IP traffic to given speed, without
prioritizing anything, do I still need queues? This was the whole point.
No you don't. I'm using pipes without queues extensively to simula
I believe Qing-li (Sp?) did an arp rewrite..
having just been in the routing code, I suddenly see why it's needed :-)
anyone played with it?
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:37:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I believe Qing-li (Sp?) did an arp rewrite..
the story is a bit longer - Andre drafted the initial design,
which i subsequently took over and with a student, Alessandro Cerri,
(I am Cc-ing him) did a first implementation. This was
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:31:00PM +0400, rihad wrote:
>Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:21:17AM +0400, rihad wrote:
>>> And if I _only_ want to shape IP traffic to given speed, without
>>> prioritizing anything, do I still need queues? This was the whole point.
>> No you don't.
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:31:00PM +0400, rihad wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:21:17AM +0400, rihad wrote:
And if I _only_ want to shape IP traffic to given speed, without
prioritizing anything, do I still need queues? This was the whole point.
No yo
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:21:17AM +0400, rihad wrote:
>And if I _only_ want to shape IP traffic to given speed, without
>prioritizing anything, do I still need queues? This was the whole point.
No you don't. I'm using pipes without queues extensively to simulate
WANs without bothering with any
Hi,
In FreeBSD 7.0 the defaults are:
net.inet.ip.dummynet.hash_size: Default hash table size
net.inet.ip.dummynet.hash_size: 64
net.inet.ip.dummynet.max_chain_len: Max ratio between dynamic queues and
buckets
net.inet.ip.dummynet.max_chain_len: 16
From man ipfw: "Target value for the maximum
At Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:48:53 -0800,
luigi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:37:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > I believe Qing-li (Sp?) did an arp rewrite..
>
> the story is a bit longer - Andre drafted the initial design,
> which i subsequently took over and with a student, Alessandro
Li, Qing wrote:
Last time when I sent an email to net@ for comments, I
received only limited feedback.
The New ARP code in my home directory on FreeFall and was
lasted updated on June-8-2007. It was based on then
CURRENT (7.0) and was tested to be working fine at
that tim
Last time when I sent an email to net@ for comments, I
received only limited feedback.
The New ARP code in my home directory on FreeFall and was
lasted updated on June-8-2007. It was based on then
CURRENT (7.0) and was tested to be working fine at
Julian Elischer wrote:
Li, Qing wrote:
Last time when I sent an email to net@ for comments, I
received only limited feedback.
The New ARP code in my home directory on FreeFall and was
lasted updated on June-8-2007. It was based on then CURRENT
(7.0) and was tested to be wor
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:30:06AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> >Li, Qing wrote:
> >>Last time when I sent an email to net@ for comments, I
> >>received only limited feedback.
> >>The New ARP code in my home directory on FreeFall and was lasted
> >> upda
On Dec 10, 2007, at 11:35 PM, rihad wrote:
Pipes and queues are two different things; a pipe simulates a
network link, and a queue is used to hold packets which are
backlogged because they are arriving faster than the outbound link
(ie, a pipe) can transmit them.
So you mean queues are only
Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:30:06AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Li, Qing wrote:
Last time when I sent an email to net@ for comments, I
received only limited feedback.
The New ARP code in my home directory on FreeFall and was lasted upd
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 10:30 AM
> To: Li, Qing
> Cc: Luigi Rizzo; FreeBSD Net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: arp rewrite...
>
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Li, Qing wrote:
> >> Last time when I sent
Li, Qing wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 10:30 AM
To: Li, Qing
Cc: Luigi Rizzo; FreeBSD Net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: arp rewrite...
Julian Elischer wrote:
Li, Qing wrote:
Last time when I sent an em
the symptom
# ifconfig bridge0 192.168.0.1 addm vr1 addm vr2 addm vr3 addm ath0 up
ifconfig: BRDGADD vr1: Invalid argument
the conditions
# kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
13 0xc040 39ad48 kernel
21 0xc27c8000 8000 if_bridge.ko
31 0xc27d 5000 bridgestp.
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Randy Bush wrote:
> the symptom
>
> # ifconfig bridge0 192.168.0.1 addm vr1 addm vr2 addm vr3 addm ath0 up
> ifconfig: BRDGADD vr1: Invalid argument
>
> the conditions
>
> # kldstat
> Id Refs AddressSize Name
> 13 0xc040 39ad48 kernel
> 21 0
> did you start off with?
>
> # ifconfig bridge create
>
> when your ifconfig -a should then also show:
>
> bridge0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500
> (etc)
>
> though it looks like 'cloned_interfaces=bridge0' is supposed to do that.
>
> cheers, Ian
sorry, cut and paste error with screen.
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Ah. Well the only other thing i noticed (after posting) was that each
> > of vr1 to vr3 showed as UP, but:
> >> media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
> >> status: no carrier
> > but I don't know whether that should matter?
>
> man page
> Ah. Well the only other thing i noticed (after posting) was that each
> of vr1 to vr3 showed as UP, but:
>> media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
>> status: no carrier
> but I don't know whether that should matter?
man page says not. and if i put ath0 first, which has
carrier/assoc
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Randy Bush wrote:
> > did you start off with?
> >
> > # ifconfig bridge create
> >
> > when your ifconfig -a should then also show:
> >
> > bridge0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500
> > (etc)
> >
> > though it looks like 'cloned_interfaces=bridge0' is supposed to
23 matches
Mail list logo
