On Dec 10, 2007, at 11:35 PM, rihad wrote:
Pipes and queues are two different things; a pipe simulates a network link, and a queue is used to hold packets which are backlogged because they are arriving faster than the outbound link (ie, a pipe) can transmit them.
So you mean queues are only used on the sending side? (the box is acting as a router) and that their purpose is to diminish packet loss rate due to network congestion? Now I get it, thanks.

Queues are used to buffer packets before sending. For a router, this affects traffic in both directions, but it's normally the case that that Internet<->router link is slower than the router<->LAN link.

What if I set it to 10000 slots, why should it wait to fill the queue before starting to send stuff out the network interface?
Well, it *doesn't* wait for the queue to be filled before starting to send stuff out the network.
This ipfw manpage section was the reason I asked (sorry for the formatting). What's with the "queuing delay" part? I'm totally confused.

    queue {slots | sizeKbytes}
Queue size, in slots or KBytes. Default value is 50 slots, which is the typical queue size for Ethernet devices. Note that for slow speed links you should keep the queue size short or your traffic might be affected by a significant queueing delay. E.g., 50 max- sized ethernet packets (1500 bytes) mean 600Kbit or 20s of queue on a 30Kbit/s pipe. Even worse effects can result if you get packets from an interface with a much larger MTU, e.g. the loopback inter-
          face with its 16KB packets.

The issue is that if you have a really slow upstream link, you can end up queuing many seconds worth of traffic using the default queue size-- depending on the priorities, you might have traffic being buffers so long that it starts breaking connections or causing needless TCP retries...

--
-Chuck

_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to