Gary Palmer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 03:40:52PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote:
opt_sctp.h
Is one created by the config program when you run
config with
options SCTP
in your list of things you want..
So for example I do
cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf
config mymachine
cd ../compile/mymachine
Lawrence:
Cools stuff...
I have my intern working on getting pluggable CC into
SCTP and HTCP with Fred's extra's as well...
Hmm.. maybe I can align your code to work with SCTP as well..
Neat..
Thanks for the good work :-D
R
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi all,
Finally managed to wrap up the co
That partially worked. I could only ping 192.168.1.1 on my local setup (router).
I used
$ mpd pptp0
However, I couldn't access the work DNS either. The latter output of
MPD looked like:
==
pptp0] IPCP: rec'd Configure Ack #4 link 0 (Ack-Sent)
IPADDR
[pptp0] IPCP: state change Ack-Sent -
Jim Stapleton wrote:
That partially worked. I could only ping 192.168.1.1 on my local setup
(router).
I used
$ mpd pptp0
However, I couldn't access the work DNS either. The latter output of
MPD looked like:
==
pptp0] IPCP: rec'd Configure Ack #4 link 0 (Ack-Sent)
IPADDR
[pptp0] IPCP:
What man/handbook pages/sections should I look at to get a clue. I'm
so far from having one, I don't even know the direction...
Thanks,
-Jim Stapleton
On 6/26/07, Artyom Viklenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Stapleton wrote:
> That partially worked. I could only ping 192.168.1.1 on my local s
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Jim Stapleton wrote:
What man/handbook pages/sections should I look at to get a clue. I'm
so far from having one, I don't even know the direction...
see handbook section about networking.
simply speaking enter
route add ip-of-vpn-server ip-of-your-lan-gateway
then sta
Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Bruce M. Simpson writes:
[snip]
| My concern is that vimage may be a very intrusive change indeed where
| these matters are concerned, unless the vimage patches are being kept
| up-to-date and regression tested as issues are resolved and new features
| added.
Jus
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Artyom Viklenko wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Jim Stapleton wrote:
>
> > What man/handbook pages/sections should I look at to get a clue. I'm
> > so far from having one, I don't even know the direction...
>
> see handbook section about networking.
>
> simply speakin
Hi.
I'm glad to present version 4.2 of MPD. It includes many new features,
performance improvements and fixes.
The most significant and unique new feature of mpd-4.2 is a link
repeater functionality. It allows mpd to accept incoming connection of
any supported type and forward it out as same or d
Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I'm glad to present version 4.2 of MPD. It includes many new features,
performance improvements and fixes.
[...]
Complete change log as always can be found at:
http://mpd.sourceforge.net/doc/mpd5.html
There has been some talk about whether mpd should be put in
Hello, freebsd-net.
We have large NAT server with 256 NAT instances there. Earlier, we
used a lot of natd daemons, but recently (some months ago) i've
moved it to ng_nat.
And it seems to me, that there is a memory leak there, cause
allocated memory grows constantly every day - after sys
If memory serves me right, Eric F Crist wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2007, at 7:55 PMJun 25, 2007, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
>
>> Eric F Crist wrote:
>>> My problem isn't getting out to 2001:4980:1::5, it's getting to my
>>> LAN, the 2001:4980:1:111::/64 network. My gateway, the machine
>>> from which I
On Jun 26, 2007, at 4:32 PMJun 26, 2007, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
If memory serves me right, Eric F Crist wrote:
Hi Eric--
First note that I'm a different Bruce than the chap who's been helping
thus far. :-)
BTW, use "ndp -a" to see this.
Your setup is not *too* different from what I have at
On Tuesday, 26 June 2007 at 18:50:23 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm glad to present version 4.2 of MPD. It includes many new features,
> performance improvements and fixes.
>
> The most significant and unique new feature of mpd-4.2 is a link
> repeater functionality. It allows mpd to
Julian Elischer wrote:
There has been some talk about whether mpd should be put in the base
system to replace our 3 other ppp implementations. I guess one step
would be to see what the usage cases would be for replacing if_ppp and
sppp and a first step
would be to see how many users of these t
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
This is probably a new feature request, but is this possible to create
some kind of VirtualTemplate interface like it is in Cisco access
routers. Currently i have to configure bunch of different ng interfaces
for every kind user. However on my Cisco 7206VXR i can bundle phys
Alexander Motin wrote:
As I see situation now:
ppp - good user-level implementation. Not very fast, but stable,
flexible and able to be used with other programs like pppoed.
possibly there could be a program that can run and then
pass the connection to mpd. ppp Uses this technique to run i
If memory serves me right, Eric F Crist wrote:
> On Jun 26, 2007, at 4:32 PMJun 26, 2007, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
[big snip]
>> I wonder if the problem I've seen with bridge(4) might be related to
>> your IPv6 problems (since you're terminating the tunnel on your
>> firewall). If so, maybe switching
On Jun 26, 2007, at 7:08 PMJun 26, 2007, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
If memory serves me right, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Jun 26, 2007, at 4:32 PMJun 26, 2007, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
[big snip]
I wonder if the problem I've seen with bridge(4) might be related to
your IPv6 problems (since you're terminati
On Wednesday, 27 June 2007 at 2:25:22 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> >This is probably a new feature request, but is this possible to create
> >some kind of VirtualTemplate interface like it is in Cisco access
> >routers. Currently i have to configure bunch of different ng
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 June 2007 at 2:25:22 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
This is probably a new feature request, but is this possible to create
some kind of VirtualTemplate interface like it is in Cisco access
routers. Currently i have to configure bunch
hi;
I wonder if new mpd still needs hundreds of config lines for 300 incoming pptp
connections.?
and does it still create a new ng interface even no pptp connections
established?
does new mpd support unlimited incoming connections?
what about performance issuess ? (ex: cpu usage, memory usag
22 matches
Mail list logo
