Alexander Motin wrote:

As I see situation now:
ppp - good user-level implementation. Not very fast, but stable, flexible and able to be used with other programs like pppoed.

possibly there could be a program that can run and then pass the connection to mpd. ppp Uses this technique to run in this way.
ppp processes can pass their open file descriptors to a central ppp
that is running in order to allow it to implement multilink.


Brian talked a bit about this at the last DevSummit.. It just needs someone with the time and knowledge. Possibly Brian could work with Alex to make sure that all the functionality of ppp is in mpd. He did say that teh command language would need looking at to ensure that people would have a chance to convert their scripts..

Mpd uses command language different from all others, but I think it is not a big problem. If we would compare supported PPP extensions then I think mpd will now win in most nominations.

The main problem I think is a general usage differences. Mpd was planned and implemented as daemon. It have very limited foreground operation and integration abilities. pppd as example is able to be called from getty and terminate after link disconnect, while mpd does not. sppp is somehow used by i4b project, but I know nothing about it.

If somebody could help me to make list of reasonable requirements and/or wanted usage examples then I surely will try to implement missing parts.


_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to