Re: Next-hop based on source address (IPv6)

On Monday 28 July 2003 07:17, Andy Gilligan wrote: > Hi, > > I have three IPv6 /48 networks connected to a FreeBSD 4.8 router, and I > allocate /64 tunnels from each network to client machines. > > Is there any way I can specify the next-hop or outbound interface to use > on the router based on the

Re: NAT and PPTP

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:37:57PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: R> I pretty much agree. Attached are my configuration files R> for mpd/pptp; please let me know (Julian) how this could R> be enhanced to serve more PPTP clients simultaneously R> (with different IP addresses). I'd appreciate it. Yo

Re: NAT and PPTP

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 07:27:38PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: B> I haven't gotten any hopes up, but it would be nice. It seems as B> if the only alternatives are to un-GNU PoPToP (which requires B> a clean room team; possible but not easy) or to create a FreeBSD B> pptpd that is analogous to pppoed.

Re: Next-hop based on source address (IPv6) [solved]

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 10:03:53AM BST, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote: > On Monday 28 July 2003 07:17, Andy Gilligan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have three IPv6 /48 networks connected to a FreeBSD 4.8 router, and I > > allocate /64 tunnels from each network to client machines. > > > > Is there any way

Re: Next-hop based on source address (IPv6) [solved]

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:48:06PM BST, Andy Gilligan wrote: > pass in on gif0 to gif1:2001:2000::1 from 2001:222:222::/48 to any > pass in on gif0 to gif2:2001:3000::1 from 2001:333:333::/48 to any ^^^ That should of course read 'pass out' :) -Andy __

Current problem reports assigned to you

Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description --- o [2002/05/04] kern/37761 net process exits but socket is still ESTAB

Re: net/1 - net/2 - net/3

On Tuesday 22 July 2003 11:14, Van Vinh Vo wrote: > what is net/1 ? net/2 ? net/3, > what is the current net now ? 1) These questions are NOT suitable for the -net mailing list, which is for discussing development of networking stacks in FreeBSD. If you must ask this sort of drivel, please do s

RTF_CLONING vs RTF_PRCLONING

I do not understand the purpose of the flag PRCLONING. What is it for ? man rtalloc: RTF_PRCLONING routes are assumed to be managed by the protocol family and no resolution requests are made, but all routes generated by the cloning process retain a reference to the route from which they were g

RTF_CLONING vs RTF_PRCLONING

< said: > I agree, then... Isn't it already the purpose of RTF_CLONING ? > When should RTF_PRCLONIG be set ? RTF_PRCLONING is set automatically by the protocol to cause host routes to be generated on every unique lookup. RTF_CLONING is set when the route is added (either manually, or automatical

Re: RTF_CLONING vs RTF_PRCLONING

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:45:28PM +0200, Vincent Jardin wrote: > I do not understand the purpose of the flag PRCLONING. What is it for ? Compare the output of netstat -rn with netstat -rna, to see the difference between a cloned and a protocol-cloned route. BMS __

Re: RTF_CLONING vs RTF_PRCLONING

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:51:28PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > RTF_XRESOLVE is set when the target of the newly cloned route is not > known by the kernel and must be set up by a user process. I'm not > sure if anything ever used this, although I guess it could be used to > implement ISIS. I h

Re: 10Ge drivers?

Yeah, you'd hope so huh. When I asked them I got a "we can neither confirm nor deny that we may someday release drivers" reply. I took that to mean that yeah, someday we may see them - but don't hold your breath. Oh well, I guess I'll stress it more once I actually get one in to mess with. > >

Differences between netgraph nodes in 4.x and 5.x

As the subject says, i developed a netgraph node (it's classifier node) using a 5.x box but tonight, i had a bad surprise: it seems the netgraph implemntation in 4.x and 5.x are different, so now. Could someone shed some light on the differences, please? Thanks. -- Paolo GUFI: http://www.

Setting up a NAT Router that will route between 3 networks

I was wondering how to modify the appropriate files to setup a FreeBSD computer to act as a NAT Router, that would do the following: One NIC card is connected to a private network, with an IP address of 192.168.0.50. This will act as the gateway to all the computers in the technology center, to

Re: Differences between netgraph nodes in 4.x and 5.x

Netgraph in 5.0 had to be alterred to support SMP locking. at teh same time some 'simplificatiosn were made, however changing a driver from one, to work witht he orther is relatively simple.. Major changes: Instead of passing separate message and o-o-band data, both are attached to a single 'item

Re: Setting up a NAT Router that will route between 3 networks

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 06:14:29PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was wondering how to modify the appropriate files to setup a FreeBSD > computer to act as a NAT Router, that would do the following: > Check the natd(8) man page, it should give you a good start. Chapter 19.12 in the handbook

Re: RTF_CLONING vs RTF_PRCLONING

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:51:28PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > I agree, then... Isn't it already the purpose of RTF_CLONING ? > > When should RTF_PRCLONIG be set ? > > RTF_PRCLONING is set automatically by the protocol to cause host > routes to be generated on every unique looku