On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 07:27:38PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: B> I haven't gotten any hopes up, but it would be nice. It seems as B> if the only alternatives are to un-GNU PoPToP (which requires B> a clean room team; possible but not easy) or to create a FreeBSD B> pptpd that is analogous to pppoed. This would use your work, Archie,
IMHO, this is not good idea. Currently I'm running two different types of access points: 1) PPPoE concentrators: pppoed + ppp 2) PPTP server: mpd with huge mpd.conf and mpd.links As I remember, Brett said that mpd allocates a number of nodes for each connection in kernel memory. That's right. But in case of pppoed+ppp or imaginary pptpd+ppp you will have a user-level process and ng_socket for each connection. Not shure that it will take less memory. But it will do a lot of context switching. On my own experience it looks like PPTP (no comperssion, no encryption) access point with mpd is more robust than PPPoE one with pppoed+ppp. Currently I'm planning to look into Alexandr Motin's patches giving PPPoE server support for mpd. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
