PLEASE HEEEEEELLLLPPPP ME...

2003-07-23 Thread zel
please HELP !!! Ok... here is my problem that I tried to explain completly ! The situation is the one below: = |SpeedToucheHome Ethernet ADSL Modem| |10.0.0.138/24 | = | 10.0.0.0/24

Re: NAT and PPTP

2003-07-23 Thread Brett Glass
At 12:21 AM 7/23/2003, Julian Elischer wrote: >it needs one netgraph node... fullstop >it uses negligable kernel ram per session >1node handles lots of sessions The way the configuration file works, one node can handle only one client. I tried to work with it when we first began to set up PPTP

Re: OpenBSD Port: FreeBSD Bluetooth Stack

2003-07-23 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
[cc'd to -net and -mobile] Hello Craig, > Thanks for the great work on the FreeBSD BlueTooth stack. It works great! thank you for trying this. i'm glad it works for you :) > I wanted to introduce myself because I am considering porting the BT stack > work you did to OpenBSD. Before I start

Re: NAT and PPTP

2003-07-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:12:04AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > At 12:21 AM 7/23/2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > > >it needs one netgraph node... fullstop > >it uses negligable kernel ram per session > >1node handles lots of sessions > > The way the configuration file works, one > node can handle

Re: NAT and PPTP

2003-07-23 Thread Julian Elischer
forget it.. I had a braino I was thinking of some other stuff. sorry for the confusion. On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:12:04AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > > At 12:21 AM 7/23/2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > >it needs one netgraph node... fullsto

Re: NAT and PPTP

2003-07-23 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > forget it.. > I had a braino I was thinking of some other stuff. > sorry for the confusion. However I do suggest that you discuss the possibility of enhancing mpd with archie to allow allocation of addresses from a pool. > > On Wed, 23 Jul

Re: NAT and PPTP

2003-07-23 Thread Brett Glass
At 02:56 PM 7/23/2003, Julian Elischer wrote: >However I do suggest that you discuss the possibility of enhancing mpd >with archie to allow allocation of addresses from a pool. I seem to recall (I could be mistaken here) that Archie has been working with a company that does Wi-Fi access points w

Re: NAT and PPTP

2003-07-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:01:54PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > At 02:56 PM 7/23/2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > > >However I do suggest that you discuss the possibility of enhancing mpd > >with archie to allow allocation of addresses from a pool. > > I seem to recall (I could be mistaken here) th

Re: NAT and PPTP

2003-07-23 Thread Archie Cobbs
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > >However I do suggest that you discuss the possibility of enhancing mpd > > >with archie to allow allocation of addresses from a pool. > > > > I seem to recall (I could be mistaken here) that Archie has been working > > with a company that does Wi-Fi access points with P

Re: NAT and PPTP

2003-07-23 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > >However I do suggest that you discuss the possibility of enhancing mpd > > > >with archie to allow allocation of addresses from a pool. > > > > > > I seem to recall (I could be mistaken here) that Archie has been working >

libalias/natd and identd support

2003-07-23 Thread Krzysztof Drewicz
Right now when natd'ing boxes one have to supply a random (fake) ident respone, or simply RST on tcp/135. Libalias&natd could provide simple way to ask 'what is real src ip/port' by knowing outgoin port and IP combination. I've written small patch for that. Natd binds additonal AF_UNIX/DGRAM soc

Re: NAT and PPTP

2003-07-23 Thread Brett Glass
At 05:16 PM 7/23/2003, Archie Cobbs wrote: >That's correct.. the code is not released. I'll ask about it again >(but don't keep your hopes up). I haven't gotten any hopes up, but it would be nice. It seems as if the only alternatives are to un-GNU PoPToP (which requires a clean room team; possibl

Re: NAT and PPTP

2003-07-23 Thread Archie Cobbs
Brett Glass wrote: > >That's correct.. the code is not released. I'll ask about it again > >(but don't keep your hopes up). > > I haven't gotten any hopes up, but it would be nice. It seems as > if the only alternatives are to un-GNU PoPToP (which requires > a clean room team; possible but not eas

Re: NAT and PPTP

2003-07-23 Thread Archie Cobbs
Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > >However I do suggest that you discuss the possibility of enhancing mpd > > > > >with archie to allow allocation of addresses from a pool. > > > > > > > > I seem to recall (I could be mistaken here) that Archie has been working > > > > with a company that does Wi-Fi

Re: libalias/natd and identd support

2003-07-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:39:08AM +0200, Krzysztof Drewicz wrote: > Right now when natd'ing boxes one have to supply a random (fake) ident > respone, or simply RST on tcp/135. Libalias&natd could provide simple way > to ask 'what is real src ip/port' by knowing outgoin port and IP combination. >

Re: NAT and PPTP

2003-07-23 Thread Brett Glass
At 10:23 PM 7/23/2003, Archie Cobbs wrote: >I'd like to, but to be truthful I don't have much time to spare >these days... Would it be possible for you to spend just a few hours on converting code from mpd's pptp_ctrl.c and pptp.c into the basis of the daemon? The daemon would need to accept inc