On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Kim Okasawa wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info. I added the route to the FreeBSD box and it can now
> ping the notebook computer but NOT vice versa (i.e. notebook cannot ping the
> FBSD box.) Any idea what might be wrong? Thanks.
Probably some firewalling somewhere blocking t
dear ,..
i have old digiboard card pc/8i adapter, but my freebsd can't detect it :(
i'm using fbsd 45R
i was compile new kernel with add line with this :
OPTIONS NDGBPORTS=8
OPTIONS COM_MULTIPORT
device dgb0
i can't write "device dgb0 at isa? bla... bla...
because if i write this my kernel can't
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
>write:
> >
> >dear ,..
> >i have old digiboard card pc/8i adapter, but my freebsd can't detect it :(
> >i'm using fbsd 45R
> >i was compile new kernel with add line with this :
> >OPTIONS NDGBPORTS=8
> >OPTIONS COM
[cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hackers,
Another developer snapshot is available at
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20020613.tar.gz
This release is for -current DP1 only. I had to
downgrade back to DP1 due to huge amount of changes
in -current.
Brief list of changes
- Basic support
too, as well as some
examples ready to put in /usr/share/examples/netgraph.
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> [cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Hackers,
>
> Another developer snapshot is available at
>
> http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20020613.tar.gz
&
Julian,
> I was just discussing this with people here at USENIX and I'd like to
> start the process for committing this.
Oh, gee, thanks :) but, i'm not so sure about committing. There
are several important bits and pieces that needed to be done. First
of all, i do want to see properly tested
[ moving discussion to freebsd-net ]
Dan Langille writes:
> A while back, mpd was suggested as a pptp client. I've started looking at
> it. However, I'm having trouble getting it to connect. The office has a
> MS server and I'm trying to connect using mpd. FWIW, I can connect via
> pptp-cl
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> [ moving discussion to freebsd-net ]
>
> Dan Langille writes:
> > A while back, mpd was suggested as a pptp client. I've started looking at
> > it. However, I'm having trouble getting it to connect. The office has a
> > MS server and I'm trying to con
Lars Eggert writes:
> > ng_mppc(4) implements lame-strength encryption.
>
> I looked briefly at ng_mppc but and was under the impression it needed a
> ppp node above it. The packets I'd like to feed to an encryption node
> are UDP (and soon TCP and IP). Or am I wrong?
In reality you can feed i
What does dgb say when you boot with -v ?
I have one of these boards here - it worked last time I tried it
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 23:08:53 +0700 (WIT), hantu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>
> > In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>you write:
> > >
> >
Dan Langille writes:
> [vpn] rec'd unexpected protocol CCP on link 0, rejecting
The peer wants to do MPPE encryption but you haven't enabled it.
> [vpn] IPCP: rec'd Configure Nak #1 link 0 (Ack-Sent)
> IPADDR 10.0.1.26
>10.0.1.26 is unacceptable
You need to relax your 'set ipcp ranges' as
[Bcc to -net]
Hi,
as I mentioned in a posting to -net a few days ago, over the past
weeks I have done an extensive rewrite of the ipfw code (both userland
and kernel) in an attempt to make it faster, more flexible and more
manageable.
The code is now almost ready for commit, so I would appreciat
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Dan Langille writes:
> > [vpn] rec'd unexpected protocol CCP on link 0, rejecting
>
> The peer wants to do MPPE encryption but you haven't enabled it.
>
> > [vpn] IPCP: rec'd Configure Nak #1 link 0 (Ack-Sent)
> > IPADDR 10.0.1.26
> >10.0.1.26 is un
Dan Langille writes:
> > > [vpn] rec'd unexpected protocol CCP on link 0, rejecting
> >
> > The peer wants to do MPPE encryption but you haven't enabled it.
> >
> > > [vpn] IPCP: rec'd Configure Nak #1 link 0 (Ack-Sent)
> > > IPADDR 10.0.1.26
> > >10.0.1.26 is unacceptable
> >
> > You need to
Archie Cobbs wrote:
>>I looked briefly at ng_mppc but and was under the impression it needed a
>>ppp node above it. The packets I'd like to feed to an encryption node
>>are UDP (and soon TCP and IP). Or am I wrong?
>
> In reality you can feed it anything you want. It's not PPP specific.
>
> Yo
Lars Eggert writes:
> As an aside, do netgraph interfaces have problems with multicast? I've
> seen crashes using both mrouted and pim6dd when I had a netgraph
> interface configured. I'll try to produce a dump next time.
Not that I know of..
If you can get a stack trace I'd be interested in t
I haven't seen a problem with multicast and netgraph but
that doesn't mean there isn't a problem. Let us see if there is a
traceback.
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Archie Cobbs wrote:
> >>I looked briefly at ng_mppc but and was under the impression it needed a
> >>ppp node above it
17 matches
Mail list logo
