I don't know what you exactly want to do..
but if you are using natd with ipfw try the options in natd..
they work a lot easier then ipfw..
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Ivan Coimbra wrote:
> I am having serious problems with the ipfw of FreeBSD. I am trying to use
> the forward of packages, and I am hav
BSD-based TCP/IP code have a bug with respect to creating TCP
connections to a broadcast address. This bug can potentially be a
security vulnerability when firewall administrators assume that the
TCP implementation works correctly and does not block broadcast
addresses.
The Standard:
TCP connec
Please note, the previous mail on this topic I sent to net@ has a bad
'From:' address in the header. Replies will not make it back to
me. In responses, please change the 'To:' to one of my valid addresses
like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I apologize for the confusion. I am still trying to figure out how
Sorry for the delayed response,
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 22:03:46 +0100,
> Bart Matthaei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The weird thing is, though, that since i've upgraded to 4.5, ssh
> connections from my irix and bsd box in my network (which have
> public ip's tunneled from work) die sponta
> On Sat, 09 Feb 2002 23:12:14 -0800,
> Nick Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I don't know if I can quantify the issue very well, but since moving
> from 4.4-RELEASE to 4.5-RELEASE on my laptop, I've noticed that
> TCP-over-IPv6 sessions get stuck rather easily. They end up in a state
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:26:52PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed response,
>
> How did you configure (particularly the default) routes on the host
> "colo"? I've seen several reports that the default route on a tunnel
> link has somehow become bogus.
>
> B
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:13:51 -0600,
> "Jay Austad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm trying to propagate rip routes using zebra (ripd) across a gif0
> tunnel interface to another freebsd box running zebra.
> I have zebra and ripd running, but they only seem to broadcast routes
> out t
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:25:10 +1100,
> Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> I recently installed the freenet6 port to test IPv6 and have been
>> experiencing similar problems, I can ping6 any host but my ftp
>> connections stall at some point.
>>
>> As an alternative you can us
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:59:18PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:25:10 +1100,
> > Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> I recently installed the freenet6 port to test IPv6 and have been
> >> experiencing similar problems, I can ping6 a
Dear All;
I tried, on win2k, to dial-up to mpd(v3.7) on
freebsd with mppe encryption. But I failed. win2k
display error messages "the remote server doesn't
support the data encrption type". I enabled
"mpp-e40","mpp-e128" and "mpp-stateless". I also check
mpd3.7's source Makefile and found
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 23:48:29 +1100,
> Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > I found what caused this. he.net uses the "route add -inet6 default
>> > " statement while freenet6.net uses "route add -inet6
>> > default -interface gif0" statement.
>>
>> Could you tell me the exac
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:16:40 -0800,
> Ross Finlayson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I have tried to configure my system (FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE) for 6to4, using
> the "stf" interface, but am getting the error message "nd6_rtrequest: bad
> gateway value: stf0" in my log, whenever I try to 'p
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm looking at a packet trace taken of an xl card under 4.5, and I see
> bad IP and TCP/UDP checksums. The release notes state that checksumming
> maybe offloaded to the NIC now, but I'd still expect them to be correct
John,
John Polstra wrote:
> You are running tcpdump on the system that's sending the "bad"
> packets, right? It makes perfect sense. The TCP/IP stack knows
> that the NIC is going to insert the checksums, so it doesn't bother
> calculating them itself. So BPF is handed packets in mbufs without
I'm about to find a solutions t VPN-interconnect out branch offices.
Today we have a main site with a /28-net where the network servers are
located. Internal net is 10.0.0/24 with S-NAT for the servers. Branch
offices use ICA protocol to connect to internal Windows Termnal server.
Branch offices
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You are running tcpdump on the system that's sending the "bad"
> > packets, right? It makes perfect sense. The TCP/IP stack knows
> > that the NIC is going to insert the checksums, so it doesn't bother
> > calculating th
can someone explain me what does it means? i get this in my syslog
/kernel: arplookup xx.xxx.x.xx failed: could not allocate llinfo
/kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for xx.xxx.x.xxrt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the mess
It seems like along with the packet being sent up to bpf, there's
a need for some flags that tell tcpdump about the packet. I haven't
looked at the current implementation, but in another system, I found
it useful to add a flag indicating whether the packet was being received
or transmitted.
> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:30:06 -0800 (PST)
> From: John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You are running tcpdump on the system that's sending the "bad"
> > > packets, right? It makes perfe
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joe Eykholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It seems like along with the packet being sent up to bpf, there's
> a need for some flags that tell tcpdump about the packet. I haven't
> looked at the current implementation, but in another system, I found
> it useful t
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:43:58AM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Joe Eykholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It seems like along with the packet being sent up to bpf, there's
> > a need for some flags that tell tcpdump about the packet. I haven't
> > looked a
I am having trouble getting a 3com 3c996b-t to
installed correctly. Is here a reference on how to properly set up the
bge(4) driver. I am useing 4.5 release
Jeff
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:41:03PM -0500, Jeff Lawton wrote:
> I am having trouble getting a 3com 3c996b-t to installed correctly. Is
> here a reference on how to properly set up the bge(4) driver. I am
> useing 4.5 release
If you told what the problem was, it would be a whole lot easier to help
Bge detects the card and it shows up on ifconfig it does not detect
1000basetx on autoselect even though the card and the switch both register
1000baset. I connected it to a 100base t port and it seems to work fine. How
do I get it to switch to 1000baset
This is the bge section of ifconfig
bge0:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 11:49:59PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 23:48:29 +1100,
> > Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> > I found what caused this. he.net uses the "route add -inet6 default
> >> > " statement while freenet6.net uses "r
On 100baset it only works for a few minuites I can mount other nfs
drives and ftp to other machines. But when I ssh in to it. I get in and about 4
commands, it disconnects and will not let me back in and It can no longer
connect to anything either.
Jeff Lawton
Ideal Solution, LLC
I am attempting to install a 3com 996b-t on a 4.5 i386 machine and I receive
siocsifmedia Device Not Configured when I attempt to for it into
1000basetx mode with the following command:
Ifconfig bge0 media 1000baseTX
Any help with this is greatly appreciated.
Jeff Lawton
Ideal Solution, LLC
I've had ppp -nat working just fine over a normal modem link,
but it is not working at all well on my ADSL link to the same
provider.
To quantify "not working at all well", although I can ping and
traceroute ok from the hosts on my LAN, HTTP and FTP traffic is
so slow and bursty as to be useless.
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Dear all;
When I selected options
NETGRAPH_MPPC_ENCRYPTION, rather than options
NETGRAPH_MPPC_COMPRESSION, in kernel config and tried
to rebuild freebsd v42. kernel, I failed. The system
printed the error messages as following
.
linking kernel
ng_mppc.o: In function `ng_mppc_constructo
30 matches
Mail list logo
