Hi,
the route command main function opens a routing socket & writes user messages to it
through the rtmsg(). My doubt is who is reading
from that routing socket?
Kindly educate me on this.
regards
ravi prasad
__
Get your own FREE,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 05:08:07AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> the route command main function opens a routing socket & writes user
> messages to it through the rtmsg(). My doubt is who is reading from
> that routing socket?
>
Many programs do: natd(8), route(8), routed(8), etc.
Che
Hi,
This with reference to the following file
/usr/src/sbin/route/route.c & /usr/src/sbin/route/ directory
The keywords variable is defined in route.c file as
struct keytab {
char *kt_cp;
int kt_i;
} keywords[] = {
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 06:13:23AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> Iam not clear about your point.
> All my queries are withrespect to the file /usr/src/sbin/route/route.c.
>
> The "route" command main() open a routing socket. All the user
> requests are stored in are stored in the stru
although in the bieringer Site it is explicitly written that the
ftpd-BSD must be started in standalone modus, I had tried to build it in
the inetd.conf and that was the reason why I couldn't make ftp to
a host where the ftpd-BSD was started by ftp request. I have tried the allow
and deny file
when I do ftp from a freeBSD pc to a Linux SuSE it takes long
between a succesful connection, but then the file transfer goes fast.
Does anybody know how can I check where the time is used?
Any useful command?
thanks:Anastasia
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fre
Sounds as though the host (SuSE) is probably waiting for a DNS lookup to timeout.
Try putting an entry into /etc/hosts for your freeBSD box, and making sure that
the SuSE box uses files before DNS for resolving - might be a nsswitch.conf,
or 'search files,dns' entry in /etc/resolv.conf. Each Linu
but I give directly the address
ftp 3ffe:
so that no DNS must be started for the connection. The SuSE "box" really uses
dns before files, but if it gets the appeal from a certain address
must the dns first be started? Do I fail some important information
at the point?
thanks:Anastasia
T
I assume you are using the ftp client that comes with FreeBSD. Before
opening the connection try taking the client out of "passive" mode.
Ex.
ftp
ftp> passive
Passive mode off.
ftp>
I have noticed that some ftp servers do not react well to passive mode.
Ted
(*
Hi,
I'm using 4.3-STABLE and added 'pseudo-device tap' to my kernel
(after trying to kldload if_tap) but it's not possible to bring
the device up because ifconfig says tap0 doesn't exist
(although it's in /dev).
Does anyone who is using it can give me an insight about how this is
supposed
As suggested by Terry, I've cooked up a patch which halts the use of mbufs
for storing tcp template structures. The structure was only used in two
places; tcp_output.c when sending packets, and tcp_timer.c when sending
keepalives. tcp_output now pulls the info directly from the tcpcb, while
tcp_
I come from the Windoze side of the playground,
where you are able to rename the Administrator account name, in order to provide
a bit more security.
Can a similar thing be done with
FreeBSD?
Cam
Hi cameron,
The short answer is that yes you can. The name is really not that important,
it is the userid that is associated with a name that is used for verifying
permissions etc. You can easily create a login name "cameron" that
is assigned userid 0, and that user will have root privileges.
La
Umm. i don'tthink that is advisable since you have normal username with uid 0,the
passwd will have
to be the same..else, every timeyou do su - wrote:
> Hi cameron,
>
> The short answer is that yes you can. The name is really not that
> important, it is the userid that is associated with a name
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:33:44PM -0500, Cameron Haegle thus
sprach:
> I come from the Windoze side of the playground, where you are able
> to rename the Administrator account name, in order to provide a
> bit more security.
> Can a similar thing be done with FreeBSD?
You could, but what you a
Very well put!
Lars
Bill Vermillion wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:33:44PM -0500, Cameron Haegle thus
> sprach:
>
> > I come from the Windoze side of the playground, where you are able
> > to rename the Administrator account name, in order to provide a
> > bit more security.
>
> > Can a sim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This with reference to the following file
> /usr/src/sbin/route/route.c & /usr/src/sbin/route/ directory
>
> But i couldnot find the keywords.h file in the directory
> /usr/src/sbin/. Kindly mail me where it is?
It's being generated at build time from the file keyword
I want to thank everyone for their input on this issue. I will take
everyone's input into serious consideration, before I fo forward.
Thanks.
Cam
- Original Message -
From: "Lars Fredriksen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Cameron Haegle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMA
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> > I've attached two patches; one for current, and one for stable. Please
> > review / test, _especially_ if you're using IPv6 or IPSec - while those
> > cases look correct, I'm not running either and haven't tested them.
>
> I've spotted some pa
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 05:48:14PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> > > I've attached two patches; one for current, and one for stable. Please
> > > review / test, _especially_ if you're using IPv6 or IPSec - while those
> > > cases look correct, I
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Lars Fredriksen wrote:
> Lars Cameron Haegle wrote:
>
> > I come from the Windoze side of the playground, where you are able to
> > rename the Administrator account name, in order to provide a bit more
> > security. Can a similar thing be done with FreeBSD? Cam
>
> Hi cameron
> I come from the Windoze side of the playground, where you are able to
> rename the Administrator account name, in order to provide a bit more
> security.
How is that anything other than security through obscurity?
That is fairly retarded and will not really provide anything except
for a *false
] > I come from the Windoze side of the playground, where you are able to
] > rename the Administrator account name, in order to provide a bit more
] > security.
]
] How is that anything other than security through obscurity?
I agree that this is a bad idea from a security standpoint.
However,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> I think we should leave TCP_COMPAT_42 in RELENG_4, so 4.x users
> won't be surprised if it's suddenly gone ...
>
> /Jesper
Actually, TCP_COMPAT_42 was a virtual no-op until Kris imported the
OpenBSD sequence number generation system. The only effect
Speaking of SSH, are there any recommended SSH clients for Windows 95?
orville.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Bill Vermillion wrote:
> Get rid of all telnet account and put in SSH so that no clear text
> passwords ever cross the net. That's just a small step on the
> way, to locking down a system, but
Orville,
The only thing I know and tried yet is PuTTY.
It's a freeware.
Cheers,
Chang
"Orville R. Weyrich.Jr" wrote:
> Speaking of SSH, are there any recommended SSH clients for Windows 95?
>
> orville.
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Bill Vermillion wrote:
>
> > Get rid of all telnet account and p
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:20:02PM -0700, Orville R. Weyrich.Jr thus sprach:
> Speaking of SSH, are there any recommended SSH clients for Windows 95?
Putty. Don't recall where I got it though. It's free
>
> orville.
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Bill Vermillion wrote:
>
> > Get rid of all telnet
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> Looking back, I should change the keepalive case so that it never needs
> the tcp template; this will require simple mods to tcp_respond. I'll
> change this and make a new patch soon.
Blech. tcp_respond doesn't look friendly, and the case where a
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Orville R. Weyrich.Jr wrote:
> Speaking of SSH, are there any recommended SSH clients for Windows 95?
>
> orville.
SecureCRT is nice, if you want to cough up some cash. There's a
trial version which will run for 30 or so days. Check it out at
www.vandyke.com
Mike "Silby"
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 09:24:00PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Jesper Skriver wrote:
>
> > I think we should leave TCP_COMPAT_42 in RELENG_4, so 4.x users
> > won't be surprised if it's suddenly gone ...
> >
> > /Jesper
>
> Actually, TCP_COMPAT_42 was a virtual no-op
ftp://psg.com/pub/w95/ssh/SSHWin-2.4.0-pl2.exe is a very windoze-ish
tool. there's also a good/windowy scp tool there.
randy
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Hi All,
I use my freebsd box as a proxy server, I had 256 MB of memory and Fast
SCSI harddisk. I think that's enough for proxy server that serves over 200
computers... But now, I think my proxy servers is slow, especially if the
connections increase (i use netstat -tna to see this connection)
Hello Steve, hello Ted, hallo Matthew hello Bill and hello Dave!
thanks a lot for your advices. You were right. In the far machine I didn't
have the client ftp pc in /etc/hosts and I thought I didn't need it
because the target pc is also the name server. However I had not
made possible for the
oops? for what it is worth: ftpd is stared from inetd on BSD systems
since the very existence of inetd, that is since the early 1980s.
There is no reason this should not work, unless you are on some creepy
system, or I may not have the full context here. Let's say you may
be doing IPv6 and the ft
34 matches
Mail list logo
