The sysctl for somaxconn is an int, however the queue limits in the
socket structures are 'short' this can cause some bad behavior if
one sets somaxconn to more than 32k.
A) So, do we bump the sockets to use 'int' for so->so_qlimit?
B) Do we fix solisten() to compensate?
C) Or de we fix the sys
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010211 01:55] wrote:
> The sysctl for somaxconn is an int, however the queue limits in the
> socket structures are 'short' this can cause some bad behavior if
> one sets somaxconn to more than 32k.
>
> A) So, do we bump the sockets to use 'int' for so->so_
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010211 01:55] wrote:
> > The sysctl for somaxconn is an int, however the queue limits in the
> > socket structures are 'short' this can cause some bad behavior if
> > one sets somaxconn to more than 32k.
> >
> > A) So, do we bump
< said:
> A) So, do we bump the sockets to use 'int' for so->so_qlimit?
Make it be `u_short'. (Actually, I'm not sure why all three of those
members aren't unsigned. It would make more sense that way.)
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net"
* Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010211 10:29] wrote:
> < said:
>
> > A) So, do we bump the sockets to use 'int' for so->so_qlimit?
>
> Make it be `u_short'. (Actually, I'm not sure why all three of those
> members aren't unsigned. It would make more sense that way.)
This still gives mi
Hi,
My DSL provider (KPN - mxstream) needs a PPTP connection. I am trying to
use netgraph-mpd to make this work. Any experience good or bad with this?
Peter
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> > I actually tried to set the ports on the 3COM switch up as trunk
> > ports, it didn't work right. Maybe 3COM is doing something entirely
> > different.
>Prolly. FEC is cisco-specific thingy, like ISL...
There's a IEEE standard these days for link aggregation. 802.3AD if I'm not
mistaken. W
Did you guys agree on a commit-worthy fix yet?
Kris
PGP signature
Bill Paul writes:
> http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul/FEC/4.x/fec.tar.gz
> http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul/FEC/5.x/fec.tar.gz
>
> This is a call for testers for a netgraph module that can be used to
> aggregate 2 or 4 ethernet interfaces into a single interface. Basically,
> it lets you do things like
Dan Larsson writes:
> Are the following ipfw lines sufficent to allow pptp?:
>
> ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to any established
> ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to ${EXT_IF} pptp setup
> ${fwcmd} add pass gre from any to any
Yes, should be. In any case you can always tell if it's not by
usin
Olivier Cherrier writes:
> >It should work with all Windows clients as long as they don't
> >require MS-CHAP version 2 authentication.
>
> Yes, it works.
> It works fine.
> But there is no encryption of data between MPD and windows clients... When I
> do some work in a such connection, I can read
> Bill Paul writes:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul/FEC/4.x/fec.tar.gz
> > http://www.freebsd.org/~wpaul/FEC/5.x/fec.tar.gz
> >
> > This is a call for testers for a netgraph module that can be used to
> > aggregate 2 or 4 ethernet interfaces into a single interface. Basically,
> > it lets you d
Regarding the rule with "established": doesn't the recent security advisory regarding
the established keyword apply here to this IPFW rule?
>From the advisory:
II. Problem Description
Due to overloading of the TCP reserved flags field, ipfw and ip6fw
incorrectly treat all TCP packets with th
Bill Paul wrote:
>
> >
> You know, so far I've gotten close to a dozen replies to this e-mail,
> but none of contain the one thing I really wanted, namely test results.
actually I saw one person say it worked flawlessly for them
(see mail from: Rainer Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> )
(workin
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > I cvsuped three hours ago and the same ARP troubles happened.
>
> can you repeat exactly what the problem was (bridge machine not
> responding to ARP requests ?) and what is your exact setup (i
> am interested in ipfw config, and the following sysctl v
Bill Paul wrote:
>
one other thing..
In ng_fec.h you have kept the same cookie number as ng_iface
which means that messages for these two can be confused.
You should use a differnt cookie
by tradition we use date -u +'%s'
to generate or change the cookie.
Since the first 3 commands you have a
Pardon me, but what bridging code are you using ? Is it from Etinc
or it is the std FreeBSD bridging code ?
luigi
>
> I'm not sure if this is related but we're using FreeBSD with a
> Emerging Technologies T1 card to do ADSL Bridging and ran into a problem
> where for example, if a
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Pardon me, but what bridging code are you using ? Is it from Etinc
> or it is the std FreeBSD bridging code ?
I'm not sure if the bridging code is from ET or if it's the
standard FreeBSD but it seems to be standard FreeBSD bridging code.
root@oa
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > Pardon me, but what bridging code are you using ? Is it from Etinc
> > or it is the std FreeBSD bridging code ?
>
> I'm not sure if the bridging code is from ET or if it's the
> standard FreeBSD but it seems to be standard FreeBSD bridging co
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> > > Pardon me, but what bridging code are you using ? Is it from Etinc
> > > or it is the std FreeBSD bridging code ?
> >
> > I'm not sure if the bridging code is from ET or if it's the
> > standard Free
> I don't have a dmesg.boot, only a dmesg.yesterday and dmesg.today.
> What specifically should I be looking for?
whether or not you have "options BRIDGE' in your kernel config file.
(or a message saying "BRIDGE ..." when the system boots)
luigi
>
> Cheers,
> Vince - [EMAIL PROTE
21 matches
Mail list logo
