On Wednesday 10 May 2006 03:49, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> MO> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:39:25 +0200
> MO> From: Milan Obuch
>
> MO> > JE> how do you want to select which table should be used?
> MO> > Ingress interface.
> MO>
> MO> Sounds reasonable, one important point missing - packets locally
> MO
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 01:16, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Ray Mihm wrote:
> > Using ipfw tables is essentially a non-starter, IMHO. How would
> > routing protocols use ipfw based tables, for example? Marko's work
> > touches a lot of files, but I don't think it's heavy weight.
> >
> > I also think u
Ray Mihm wrote:
Point taken about the globals but layer 3 (IP) and layer 4 (TCP, UDP,
etc) aren't modules yet and that shouldn't be a problem right? I'm not
trying to trivialize or solve the problem here. But my point is, these
shouldn't be show-stoppers when you consider the benefit of having
t
Point taken about the globals but layer 3 (IP) and layer 4 (TCP, UDP,
etc) aren't modules yet and that shouldn't be a problem right? I'm not
trying to trivialize or solve the problem here. But my point is, these
shouldn't be show-stoppers when you consider the benefit of having
this feature in Fre
MO> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:39:25 +0200
MO> From: Milan Obuch
MO> > JE> how do you want to select which table should be used?
MO> > Ingress interface.
MO>
MO> Sounds reasonable, one important point missing - packets locally
MO> originated/'destinated'.
MO> Other than that, fully acceptable.
IMN
Ray Mihm wrote:
Using ipfw tables is essentially a non-starter, IMHO. How would
routing protocols use ipfw based tables, for example? Marko's work
touches a lot of files, but I don't think it's heavy weight.
I also think using Marko's idea and Jails would allow create the
notion of a logical sy
Using ipfw tables is essentially a non-starter, IMHO. How would
routing protocols use ipfw based tables, for example? Marko's work
touches a lot of files, but I don't think it's heavy weight.
I also think using Marko's idea and Jails would allow create the
notion of a logical system and multiple
Milan Obuch wrote:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 22:25, Ray Mihm wrote:
Can't you just incorporate Marko's work at
http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/vimage/index.html? The design looks
pretty clean too. And, XORP which probably is multiple tables aware,
would make FreeBSD a really kick-ass routing plat
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 22:25, Ray Mihm wrote:
> Can't you just incorporate Marko's work at
> http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/vimage/index.html? The design looks
> pretty clean too. And, XORP which probably is multiple tables aware,
> would make FreeBSD a really kick-ass routing platform.
>
Unfortuna
Can't you just incorporate Marko's work at
http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/vimage/index.html? The design looks
pretty clean too. And, XORP which probably is multiple tables aware,
would make FreeBSD a really kick-ass routing platform.
Just my $.02
Ray.
On 5/9/06, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Milan Obuch wrote:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 06:54, Julian Elischer wrote:
Pramod Srinivasan wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am curious to know if there is any plans to support multiple routing
tables in FreeBSD's official release?
There was some discussion on this topic last year, if there is any v
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pramod Srinivasan wrote:
> > I am curious to know if there is any plans to support multiple routing
> > tables in FreeBSD's official release?
>
> I am doing some small bits of work on this..
>
> how do you want to select which table should be u
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 08:00, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> JE> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:54:18 -0700
> JE> From: Julian Elischer
>
> JE> how do you want to select which table should be used?
>
> Ingress interface.
>
Sounds reasonable, one important point missing - packets locally
originated/'destina
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 06:54, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Pramod Srinivasan wrote:
> >Hi Folks,
> >
> >I am curious to know if there is any plans to support multiple routing
> >tables in FreeBSD's official release?
> >
> >There was some discussion on this topic last year, if there is any vrf
> >patch
JE> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:54:18 -0700
JE> From: Julian Elischer
JE> how do you want to select which table should be used?
Ingress interface.
Consider: 802.3ad, ECMP, FIB, multi RIBs (e.g., OSPF vs BGP weight), VRF
I started working on all of the above late in 2003 on 4.x; the project
was sh
Pramod Srinivasan wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am curious to know if there is any plans to support multiple routing
tables in FreeBSD's official release?
There was some discussion on this topic last year, if there is any vrf
patch for a latest release of FreeBSD, I would love to give it a try.
I
Hi Folks,
I am curious to know if there is any plans to support multiple routing
tables in FreeBSD's official release?
There was some discussion on this topic last year, if there is any vrf
patch for a latest release of FreeBSD, I would love to give it a try.
Any help greatly appreciated.
Than
17 matches
Mail list logo
