On Wednesday 10 May 2006 03:49, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> MO> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:39:25 +0200
> MO> From: Milan Obuch
>
> MO> > JE> how do you want to select which table should be used?
> MO> > Ingress interface.
> MO>
> MO> Sounds reasonable, one important point missing - packets locally
> MO> originated/'destinated'.
> MO> Other than that, fully acceptable.
>
> IMNSHO, I'd rather have a { default | manually-specified } table for
> locally-sourced packets.
>My point is I need two processes, say apache, running with two different routing tables (typically only default route in there, but this does not conceptually matters). That's whole point why I was using Marko's vimages for. (With more processes, but this does not matter here) Regards, Milan -- Please reply to maling list only. I read it regularly. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
