Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> I have this:
>
> spdadd 10.0.2.0/26 10.0.2.128/28 any -P in ipsec
> esp/tunnel/209.167.75.124-209.167.75.123/require;
> spdadd 10.0.2.128/28 10.0.2.0/26 any -P out ipsec
> esp/tunnel/209.167.75.123-209.167.75.124/require;
>
> Although now I'm slightly confused since I
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Brian Somers wrote:
>
> > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Brian Somers wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:54:49 +0100,
> > > > > > Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The local endpoint can't be pinged unless you've got a route for
>
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Brian Somers wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Brian Somers wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:54:49 +0100,
> > > > > Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > >
> > > > > The local endpoint can't be pinged unless you've got a route for
> > > > > it... t
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Brian Somers wrote:
>
> > > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:54:49 +0100,
> > > > Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > >
> > > > The local endpoint can't be pinged unless you've got a route for
> > > > it... that's just the way the routing code works.
> > >
> > >
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Brian Somers wrote:
> > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:54:49 +0100,
> > > Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > The local endpoint can't be pinged unless you've got a route for
> > > it... that's just the way the routing code works.
> >
> > > You can ping th
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:54:49 +0100,
> > Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > The local endpoint can't be pinged unless you've got a route for
> > it... that's just the way the routing code works.
>
> > You can ping the local address for an Ethernet interface, but that's
>
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:54:49 +0100,
> Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The local endpoint can't be pinged unless you've got a route for
> it... that's just the way the routing code works.
> You can ping the local address for an Ethernet interface, but that's
> just because t
> I'm forwarding a message directly to me, with a permission of the
> sender, because I myself do not have enough time to tackle this.
>
> JINMEI, Tatuya
> Communication Platform Lab.
>
I'm forwarding a message directly to me, with a permission of the
sender, because I myself do not have enough time to tackle this.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Cor
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:26:04 -0400,
> "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I've got a question for all of you net hackers.
> When I configure a gif interface, why can't I ping the local endpoint on the
> inside of the tunnel? I've just been through hell and back trying to get
> When I configure a gif interface, why can't I ping the local
> endpoint on the inside of the tunnel?
(This is from memory, can't double-check right now.)
I believe I've seen this, too; and the problem was that when gifs are
brought up, no route to loopback is added for the local address. (This
I've got a question for all of you net hackers.
When I configure a gif interface, why can't I ping the local endpoint on the
inside of the tunnel? I've just been through hell and back trying to get
some IPSec tunnels created (they're working now, thanks to all those who
helped me out), and this
12 matches
Mail list logo
